ChrisJM981

Great flick.

Disclaimer: Shoot Straight Inc. Does NOT engage in the online sale of firearms to the following states. Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Washington D.C.

Exactly. I'm still checking for any tests on ballistics gel. My hypothesis is that at around 3000 fps that wound is going to be very effective in neutralizing a threat.

Tim from Military Arms Channel got a 3 MOA group at 50 yards with 62 gr M885. That was a large improvement over the 6 MOA with 55 gr 5.56mm. I wonder how 77 gr would group?

Thank you to @Franklin Armory for I have a pretty good idea why. PM inbound @Franklin Armory.

I can't wait to leave this state.

ANJRPC has 15 days from the date of NJ's filing to to respond if I remember correctly. I can't wait to read how they rip NJ apart... again.

Good luck Anthony!

Ummm how many people did we have ready to fill out CCW applications to be denied? I forget who was organizing it, but we were ready to go.

I can't wait for ANJRPC's response. In the meantime I'll start researching handguns for carry.

That's what comes up as a Shockwave. Yours has a pistol grip. Isn't is a pistol? Okay saw Black Aces is gtg as well. Does it need to be pump?

Yeah I have a thought I've been exploring. PM inbound.

I should have specified in New Jermany, not America.

ACOG. I think that's the only optic that isn't affected by my astigmatism. So far I've had no luck with an EOTech, PA red dot, Aimpoint PRO, Vortex Spitfire 1x Prism scope. I need to find someone that owns an MRO I suppose.

I'd like clarification on that. It's a pistol brace, but does it really matter what it's called?

Buy my book, it will keep you out of jail. Buy the law service I sell in case you get arrested anyway. I'm all for capitalism, but not at our peril.

He uses MAY because for some reason he isn't confident to state it is permissable as his legal opinion. I assume that is to act as a protection from civil litigation should someone actually be arrested for it if he said it IS legal. I'm not looking to rock the boat at the range. If they don't want us to bring loaded mags for safety reasons I'm all for it. This falls on Nappen for causing this spread of misinformation.

I was at a monthly meeting for the new range I am joining and one of the individuals that runs the range safety orientation stated that someone attending the orientation came with loaded magazines and that it's a felony. I know it's not in the statutes, you know it's not there, so where is this coming from? Is there any instances where this happened, case law, precedent, or whatever the proper term is? I'm not looking to create an argument, but come on. Where is this nonsense coming from?

Any chance you want to come over and reorganize my house too? Makes more sense especially for those visiting for the first time. Good job Maks.

Right after the part he has underlined to support his argument that a shockwave is a destructive device it says, "any weapon capable of firing a projectile of a caliber greater than 60 caliber, except a shotgun or shotgun ammunition generally recognized as suitable for sporting purposes" It exempts firearms that shoot shotgun ammo right after he stops underlining. The guy will get his permit & go away, Nappen gets paid from the Go Fund Me, and also gets free advertising material for his next client. I assure you he wants no changes in the law. He's just here to make a living.

Magpul should airdrop crates of 30 rd mags. Flood the state!

Thanks. I've been waiting 8 years for a case to make it to SCOTUS, so what's another month of the State dragging its feet?

Was it in 5.56 and did you sell it with some mystery ammo in canvas bags?

WTF? Is there a link available?