charleslee

Fellas, I'm considering buying an AR w/ the following & need to know pls. what 'a OK in the Socialist Reoublic of New Jersey. I'm thinking the flash hider is a no-no so that would have to be replaced prior to shipping? Also, what about the multi-position butt stock? Thank you. Here's how they are standard: * Sig Barrels, excellent quality * Mil-spec Forged Uppers of top quality * Mil-spec Forged Lowers of top quality * multi-position butt stock * Carbine M4 handguards * EACH rifle will include a Performance Trigger Job! * These are flat top, picatinny rail uppers * Stepped M4 Contour Barrels * M4 birdcage flash hiders * Forward assists * Mil-spec Bolt Carrier Group

I sold them a couple of handguns & they were fair. Nice people. I plan on giving them future business when I get my income tax $ and am able to get some more toys. Their transfer fee is cheaper than just about anyone-what you'd find down south of out west.

They shot down an airliner w/ Americans aboard back in the 'i80's. Reagan didn't shoot one of theirs down (Thank God!) & nothing was done SO you think anything much w/ come of this? They can do whatever they want.

THIS: http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_jPlq6oZVQ

PK90: I just checked, they want $19.99. Better go w/ one of the above.

That's very good. Better go for it if still available?

I just ordered 10 .50 cal. from Aim. W/ shipping to NJ, cost $152.00. I think I saw them @ Dick's for $25 a piece so this is considerably cheaper.

Good luck-give this contest a try: Ammo give away contest http://www.bulkammo.com/rifle/bulk-.223-ammo#contest

Maybe fixed???

Bottom line, you have to separate actors from their real selves. Just enjoy the movie & forget about the actors' beliefs, causes, stances, etc. Who gives a shit what they believe in? They are only actors. A lot of them are activists. They should stick to acting. That's what they are good at or not. It's what they make more money going than we'll ever see regardless.

Navy SEALS not Marines.

What's a COE?

Happy, happy, happy!!! Sgt. Toadette- Love that clip.

Happy, happy, happy!!! Sgt. Toadette: Love that clip.

Vlad said:also just to add.. the second video.. its entertainment.. and is of no way an indication of life.. and the whole "thug" culture is a product of people turning to crime in urban areas.. "gangster rap" did not create crime... I listen to all types of music.. and hard rap is included in that... rapping about selling drugs.. shooting at people... but I have no interest in doing either of those things.. I also watch ultra violent movies.. and play video games with violence.. but hey... no ill effects... people sometimes blame things like rap music for kids being all screwed up... but that is just shirking accountability.. kids are screwed up because they are not being raised correctly.. its that simple.. If anyone thinks that violence in movies & video games doesn't in turn cause violence, they're nuts. Maybe not movies so much but video games. Look at the puke in Conn. He played them. Granted many do & don't commit violence but they've done studies & the games have a negative impact. Did we have all these mass shootings in the 50's. NO. .60's? NO. Are there other contributors? Sure but you can't tell me that all the ultra violence in the video games & the crap spewed in some music is helping.

Whoa Pizza Bob, research ProMag. I think you'll come to a different conclusion.

iCarry:thanks, I didn't know that obviously. Baby face Finster: You're right-don't patronize them. That was the 2nd time buying ammo there, I have bought a few other things. Anyone: where to go for good ammo prices close to Jackson?

I hate buying anything in their gun section! Rude SOB's every time, I swear. Why do they have to be so nasty. Oh, I get it, they're living up to their store name. Bingo. I just bought a box of .38 Sp. there & asked the guy if he had any 7.62? He asks me 7.62 X what? WTF? I doubt they carry 7.62 X 54, duh! So when I respond 39 he just points to a particular section in the cage like I'm a blind idiot for not seeing. Well sorry A-Hole but 7.62 wasn't listed on the card on the outside of the cage w/ the other enclosed calibers. Besides, whatever happened to just bring nice & showing me w/out being put off & displaying an attitude. I can't stand these guys. DICKS!!!!!!!!!!!! Went to the sporting goods section the day before & the young guy was helpful & nice so it's not the whole damn store.

When did they change over to the plastic trigger group?

I was watching that new show Extreme Survival Akaska the other day & the one older guy Marty had w/ him a .22 Magnum revolver which he said he had used to kill a bear? Really??? I certainly wouldn't want to go up against one w/ anything less than a .357 Magnum but then again, he's an "expert."

I'm calling PETI (People for the Ethical Treatment of Insects)!!!

Yeah a Mosin Nagant was my 2nd. guess. She did wound it but then her & her husband went to it & he slit it's throat.

Anybody recognize the rifle used by the Eslimo wife to shoot caribou in the show Life Below Zero? Was it a K98 Mauser? Obviously a MilSurp of some type. Old & beat up but works fine. A true testament.

I need you AK experts opinion & help pls. I'm considering buying a Mak-90 & from the pics the seller sent me, it looks like it's in pretty good condition but I'd like your input. Just need someone to post them. PM me & I'll email them to you. The price of the rifle is $700.00. Thanks a lot!

Background check bill faces likely Senate defeat Associated Press - 32 mins ago WASHINGTON (AP) — A bipartisan effort to expand background checks faced almost certain defeat Wednesday as the Senate approached a long-awaited vote on the linchpin of the drive to curb gun violence. As the showdown drew near, an Associated Press-GfK poll showed ebbing public support for tightening gun control laws. With the roll call just hours away, three more senators — Republican Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire and Democrats Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota and Mark Pryor of Arkansas — said they opposed the background check measure. Their announcements, along with opposition from other Republicans and moderate Democrats, left supporters heading toward defeat unless they could turn votes around in the final hours, a near impossible task. Rejection of the proposal would be a jarring setback for gun control advocates, who hoped the Dec. 14 shooting rampage that killed 20 children and six adults at a Newtown, Conn., elementary school would sway Congress to enact new firearms restrictions. Defeating the background check plan also would give a victory to the National Rifle Association, which has fought the idea as a misguided crackdown on gun rights that criminals would ignore anyway. "As of this morning, we're short. We need more votes. It's close," Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., a sponsor of the background check compromise, said in a brief interview. Asked how he could get the needed votes with so many opponents, he said, "We're just hoping the good Lord will enter their heart and maybe change a few." The White House said it wasn't giving up hope. Presidential spokesman Jay Carney said President Barack Obama was working on building support. Perhaps helping explain Democrats' problems, an AP-GfK poll this month showed that 49 percent of those surveyed support stricter gun laws. That was down from 58 percent in January. By comparison, 52 percent expressed disapproval in the new survey of how Obama has handled gun laws. Weeks after the Newtown slayings, Obama made near-universal background checks the heart of his gun control plan. "Every once and awhile we are confronted with an issue that should transcend politics," Obama said in an interview that aired Wednesday on NBC's "Today" show. "And now's the time for us to take some measure of action that's going to prevent some of these tragedies from happening again." Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said gun control was a legitimate issue to debate but didn't think victims and their families should be used "like props" to politicize a tragedy. Relatives of victims of Newtown and other mass shootings have lobbied lawmakers to restrict guns, and several planned to be in the visitors' gallery during Wednesday's vote. Many have appeared at news conferences, including at the White House. "I think that, in some cases, the president has used them as props and that disappoints me," Paul said at a breakfast sponsored by The Christian Science Monitor. Carney responded that the Newtown families were in Washington "because their children were murdered. They're here asking the Senate to do something that's common sense." The Senate planned eight other votes in addition to one on background checks. Each is an amendment to a broad gun control measure. They included Democratic proposals to ban assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines; the two were expected to lose. There also was a Republican proposal requiring states to honor other states' permits allowing concealed weapons; that was facing a close vote. As the day's debate began, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., set the tone for the GOP, whose members have largely opposed many of the Democratic proposals. "The government shouldn't punish or harass law-abiding citizens in the exercise of their Second Amendment rights," he said. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., who has backed some gun rights efforts in the past, said he would back the assault weapons ban. He rejected some opponents' claims that confiscating weapons would leave them vulnerable to an out-of-control government. "I'll vote for the ban because maintaining law and order is more important than satisfying conspiracy theorists who believe in black helicopters," he said. The concealed weapons amendment, seen by advocates as protecting gun rights, was vehemently opposed by gun control groups, which say it would allow more guns into states with stricter firearms laws. Background checks, aimed at screening out criminals and the seriously mentally ill from getting firearms, now apply only to purchases handled by licensed firearms dealers. The amendment by Manchin and Sen. Patrick Toomey, R-Pa., would extend the checks to firearms sales at gun shows and online. The compromise was widely seen as advocates' best chance for winning enough GOP votes to muscle broadened checks through the Senate. Opponents will need just 41 of the Senate's 100 votes to derail the Manchin-Toomey background check plan. Thirty-one senators voted last week to completely block debate on overall gun legislation. Just two were Democrats — Pryor and Mark Begich of Alaska. If all 31 oppose the Manchin-Toomey measure, and that was not certain, opponents would need just 10 more votes to prevail. So far, 12 of 16 Republicans who voted last week to let debate on the gun bill begin have said they would oppose Manchin-Toomey. That would give foes of expanded background checks 42 potential votes, or one more than they need to win. Still uncertain was support from some Democrats from GOP-heavy states, including Max Baucus of Montana and Mary Landrieu of Louisiana. Both face re-election next year. The Senate gun bill would extend background checks to nearly all gun purchases, toughen penalties against illegal gun trafficking and add small sums to school safety programs. The AP-GfK poll found that overall, 49 percent said gun laws should be made stricter while 38 percent said they should stay the same. The poll was conducted from April 11-15 by GfK Roper Public Affairs and Corporate Communications. It involved landline and cellphone interviews with 1,004 randomly chosen adults and had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.9 percentage points. ___ AP Director of Polling Jennifer Agiesta, news survey specialist Dennis Junius and writers Henry C. Jackson, Stephen Ohlemacher and Jim Abrams contributed to this report. 1448 comments To fix any problem, you first have to correctly identify it. And this is where they failed on gun violence.... The One, 1 hr ago Mr. Reid- I am not a conspiracy theorist who believes in "black helicopters"......but I damn sure believe in our Constitution. Jack, 3 hrs ago Dirty Harry Reid is again exploiting children in the "gun confiscation debate". Alan, 2 hrs ago In the mean time, gun grabber Democrat Diane Feinstein admitted that gun checks wouldn't have stopped the Connecticut shooter. She did LIE and say that his mother gave her son the guns, which of course is not true. He stole them from her and shot her in the head. Shawn, 1 hr ago Obama and Bloomberg claim that America’s police officers want gun bans and gun control…but a breaking new survey of nearly 15,000 active and retired law enforcement officers shows that an overwhelming majority of America’s policemen and women do NOT support Obama’s gun control agenda AT ALL. In fact, a whopping 71% of law enforcement officers say Obama’s gun ban will do NOTHING to stop violent crime. An even larger 80% say that more background checks will have ZERO effect. And an overwhelming 91% of law enforcement officers say that prosecutions and mandatory sentencing is the best way to combat violent crime…the two most important actions that Barack Obama has refused to take. You and I both know that Obama and Bloomberg are lying when they say America’s rank-and-file police officers agree with their gun control agenda