bbk

Hello and welcome! Glad to have you.

http://www.paperbackswap.com/index.php Its a good read, though I was sort of surprised that Hollywood decided to do a movie (probably was hoping for the same type of success from McCarthy's other lit-turned-film "No Country for Old Men," and the recent apoc/post-apoc craze). The movie was well done, and it didn't really ruin aspects of the book... though that could be why the movie was such a bore. But to note, I enjoy stories that do not necessarily re-write/speculate on WHY/WHAT led to this post-apoc situation... but instead focuses on the actual story... if I needed the overly-blown visual speculation, I would just waste my money on 2012 (which I did). I recommend the read, and actually anything by Cormac McCarthy.

Man, Wal Marts here are nothing compared to the "outside world." I remember there being three Super Wal Marts and Super Targets within a ten mile radius in the Denver suburbs... ah, the power of knocking down socio-cultural and racial barriers. What makes me scratch my head though is when gas stations sell alcohol (in Colorado too-- not here). They couldn't sell it after midnight, but still.

:clap: I'm at 22.

Welcome, and nice, another random three letter username person.

Hello and welcome

True. If you look closely, this document is dated 1986 or so-- so, the most recent BATFE ruling would supercede this. However, its good knowledge, and I'm glad to have seen this letter.

It may be frowned upon, agreed. However, it states that the bolt carrier is not capable of allowing the rifle to fire beyond semi-auto capabilities as long as no other M16 parts are in the rifle itself. It may be toeing the line having an M16/FA bolt? Yes; only because if the individual acquires any other parts it would make their AR full-auto capable. So, like any responsible owner, be accountable and aware of the aftermarket parts you might get that would make the AR machine gun capable, and not get them!

The movie was decent. The critics trashed the movie, haha... saying it was Denzel's "Waterworld," or "Battlefield Earth." I don't think the movie fell into those categories at all; though I do wish there were more scenes with Denzel and Gary Oldman. The action was solid (surprisingly there wasn't as much as you would think) and necessary... didn't overdue the action. The desolation they showed of the aftermath was well done. And I think it was a good iteration for the post-apocalyptic genre as a whole. Will it go into the annals of post-apocalyptic stories/films? Eh. The Road was a far better post-apocalyptic story, albeit boring as hell to watch.

I run an Eotech 517 and DMS-1; with the DMS currently on the rifle. I don't have any experience with the Accupoints, though I've toyed around with the TA31. My only comment about Trijicon, generally speaking, is that they have awesome glass. If you can get your hands on an accupoint model for a decent price, I would say go for it. As for DMS-1's, the glass is pretty good considering the cost... actually, the glass is awesome considering the price. It is a tad heavy, weighing in at 18oz (other similar 1-4x aren't much lighter... normally ~16oz). Maks saw my rifle, and commented on that-- and I totally agree. Does it make it a bit of a pain for HD purposes? Maybe, but honestly if lugging around another pound is an issue, just do more PT (or consider walking around with it the PT!). As for the glass itself, its definitely not true 1x. Now, to go against the grain, could you use the both-eye open concept? Yea, I've found that there isn't much of a difference when shooting at paper 7-10m... which is what I would expect the distance to be in an HD situation. Another variable scope I would recommend is Nightforce's NXS 1-4... though, its quite pricey. I've heard a lot of good things recently about their products: http://nightforceoptics.com/nightforces ... 24nxs.html

It is legal. What you need an NFA stamp for is the Auto/Burst Fire FCG. The difference between the different types of BCGs is the design and weight. FA (Full auto) vs. M16 vs. SA (Semi auto) differ in design (slightly) and weight. What makes FAs so reliable is that they are heavier, allowing for a more consistent cycling motion (from my understanding)... hopefully leading to less FTF/FTEs. Edit to add: The only downfall is that certain models need some aftermarket work sometimes to fit the models. The only one I'm aware of is one of the Colt models.

The thing about the ACR is that its Bushmaster/Remington/Magpul's entry for the "future rifle" contract with the US Army (I don't know the exact name of the contract), which differs from the "modern rifle" contract that has been kicking around for years now (the one that the XM8 and 416 almost won). So, the ACR being available to the civilian market is more of a novelty at this point, and the price will definitely drop in the years to come (and hopefully improve).

Welcome to the group

Also known as the shemagh, which comes in an assortment of colors, and really are quite suitable for the harsh environments of the region... not so much for VA though

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,583912,00.html Most of you probably have heard of this by now. Pretty crazy, and I'm surprised this didn't end in a shoot out. The further details should be something to look out for in the next days/weeks. A 'great job' to our NJ LEOs and other elements for stopping this before it ended up as another tragedy.

Its in .40SW, specifically its the P229R. Long story short, but he actually has another P229 on order-- though it'll take some time for it to come in. He ran across a deal for a P229 that he couldn't pass up, and I basically convinced him to get it. Since the town he does his paperwork in is mighty quick, by the time the one month goes by (OGAM), he should have his new permits and his order should arrive... and maybe I can work out a deal to buy this 229 from him! (My permits should be coming in any day now.) This is a recent model, though I don't remember for sure. Only bought in the last year, and has less then 100 rounds through it.

For the troops that are involved in the mess, there is no doubt that they are focused on the mission. However, I agree that after the dust settles for the warriors, it is quite conflicting. There may be some that have no doubt in their mind that the mission is just. However, for others, while they may feel obligated to stand by their past convictions because of the "brotherhood" they were a part of for a period in time, it is only human to dissect and analyze the situation. I support my country and would "bleed on that flag," but the people who run this country are slowly degrading it. Another bone to pick, while a little off-topic, is how the Republicans are claiming that the Tea Party is their movement. Maybe most people feel that way, but I've always felt that the Tea Party organization was a grassroot campaign free of political boundaries. I've always felt that it was a vessel for the voice of the American people/patriots-- not some political party that is no better then its opposition. If the Tea Party is sucked into the Republican party, ugh, another waste. Edited to stay on topic, and not to be so crass.

Not going tonight. I'll be there around 2ish tomorrow afternoon to help my friend break in his new P229 though, and finally do that range report on my AR setup.

So, pretty much give it a few months, and it will be on the list probably. Seeing how every other major battle rifle has made it on the ban list, I would think the SCAR or ACR will soon be added as well. Can you grandfather rifles if you get one before its banned? Or what? Even so, its a hot $3000+ right now.

This year's Jets were eerily similar to last year's Ravens. A defensive minded team led by a rookie QB and power-run offense (both teams having a veteran running back with an emerging rookie running back... Thomas Jones/Shonn Green and McGahee/Ray Rice), and of course both had Rex Ryan. With that said, I knew that it was a miracle enough to make it to the playoffs, let alone the AFC championship game. If the Jets can stay healthy and their defense keeps growing, it'll be a bright future.

I'm thinking about joining up this Spring. Its closer to me then BA, and I prefer to shoot outdoors regardless. My only objections are the days the range is open and the weather-permitting hours.

Hello and welcome!

+1... as a disclaimer, I don't advocate any unlawful actions here. But, to me too, this type of rifle is indeed a battle rifle type. Maybe its not PC to say that, or it riles up the anti's... and honestly the rifle would probably never be used in its lifetime for that purpose. However, I totally agree with Damaged. Truth is, if I'm trying to take a precision shot at a long distance, I wouldn't want to do it with any AK. But for kicking it around in the field, and relying on it-- I've heard just as good of things about Saiga's as I have heard of other variants.

That's a good point that Sigman brings up. Even if you invest in a 18''+ upper at first, you can always get another upper (as long as its NJ compliant) without going through the process of purchasing another firearm. Its actually something that I'll probably be doing myself as soon as I have some more money in the next few months.

I too want a bolt-action system, but truth is that unless I hunt (elsewhere, not in this state) or do some long range shooting (again, not in this state probably), I'd rather have an AR platform. You already know the flexibility an AR system can have. If you get say a mid-length or rifle sized upper (which are starting to really make a come back), you can easily touch 300M with iron sights with the proper fundamentals. With more practice, a magnified scope, maybe a free-floated competition barrel (like those available from White Oak), and the proper ammo... well, when you find out the limits of said AR, let me know