DirtyDigz

From facebook this morning:

Would make sense if one of the other car occupants changed their story and admitted ownership of the firearm.

Move now if you want it - they sold out before in 2 days, this is the 2nd batch, no guarantee there will be a 3rd, stock remaining # is roughly accurate and the arfcom legion is all over this.

Shellback Tactical Plate Carrier with side pockets, Made in USA, any color you want as long as it's black, $49.99 + s/h: http://www.shellbacktactical.com/black-plate-carrier-with-side-pockets-50-dollars.aspx

I'm digging the "features list" at that site. Features: - Front Sight *AND* - Rear Sight

Un-facebooked OP's link so that it actually works: http://njsp.org/news/pdf/rp_20141215_1354.pdf From the PDF - where to submit comments:

Any NJ case law out there of someone being prosecuted for Dumdum possession and *NOT* hollowpoint possession?

Like Russian Roulette, but with less uncertainty: http://www.elkharttruth.com/news/indiana/2014/12/10/35-years-for-Indiana-man-in-Russian-roulette-death.html My emphasis added. Hrmm, maybe if he was using a Lorcin .380...

I get these calls at my work number a couple of times a week. As well as the "credit card services" ones, I'm getting some more sophisticated ones that actually have an algorithm that does voice recognition and plays back recorded responses in reaction to what you say in an attempt to make you think you're talking to a live person. Those calls are actually somewhat interesting as I explore the bounds of how sophisticated their system is...It's like a turing test. Anyway, I hope all these phone scammers die in a grease fire. The Caller ID info on these calls is probably worthless. They're likely spoofing the calling phone number, they can make the calling number appear to be anything they want: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caller_ID_spoofing There's laws against this, of course. If you can PROVE that they're spoofing caller ID then they're liable for a $10K fine per call.

Cool. Perhaps the next gunforhire radio episode will tell more.

I note for the discussion that there is a vendor selling a drop-in bump-fire (excuse me, "positive reset") trigger with accompanying "evil 3rd position" safety that claims ATF approval: https://tacconusa.com/ https://tacconusa.com/library/files/TAC-CON-TM-ATF-Compliant-Letter.pdf

2A/RKBA rights not being further eroded is not a "Win", it's status quo. "Wins" are where rights are STRENGTHENED. A "win" would be the Attorney General declaring that self defense counts as a justifiable need for carry licenses. That said, I'll take that AG smart gun opinion over the alternative...

Owner of CX4 storm here - mag type that it uses can be changed if you swap out magwell inserts. So if you happen to find a deal on one that uses the "wrong" mag type, do some research to find out if you can buy the right "insert". If it's available, then go for it - the inserts are a relatively easy swap.

Are you trying to imply that FOPA doesn't cover handguns?: http://www.nraila.org/gun-laws/articles/2010/guide-to-the-interstate-transportation.aspx "Federal law does not restrict individuals from transporting legally acquired firearms across state lines for lawful purposes except those explicitly prohibited by federal law to include convicted felons; persons under indictment for felonies; adjudicated “mental defectives” or those who have been involuntarily committed to mental institutions; illegal drug users; illegal aliens and most nonimmigrant aliens; dishonorably discharged veterans; those who have renounced their U.S. citizenship; fugitives from justice; persons convicted of misdemeanor crimes of domestic violence; and persons subject to domestic violence restraining orders. Therefore, no federal permit is required (or available) for the interstate transportation of firearms. Title 18- Part 1- Chapter 44- s926A" No. Here's the actual statute, no mention of a *requirement* to own property or have permission from property owner in connection with place of business: "e. Nothing in subsections b., c. and d. of N.J.S.2C:39-5 shall be construed to prevent a person keeping or carrying about his place of business, residence, premises or other land owned or possessed by him, any firearm, or from carrying the same, in the manner specified in subsection g. of this section, from any place of purchase to his residence or place of business, between his dwelling and his place of business, between one place of business or residence and another when moving, or between his dwelling or place of business and place where such firearms are repaired, for the purpose of repair. For the purposes of this section, a place of business shall be deemed to be a fixed location."

Not sure I can make it, probably better for my wallet anyway. Let me know what you see there LowSlow.

If anyone cares, some pics of the build/costume in action are here (Pretty NSFW - no nudity, but still won't go over well with the easily offended): http://imgur.com/a/xBcAr

Surely OP will update us with how this turned out...

Thatsa funny!

Huh, never heard of this show before. Anyone who has gone before care to give some "flavor" on it?

...and as long as he is legally an *owner* of the business, not just an employee.

One thing to do also, especially if you're looking at safes in the $300-$600 or so range - when you narrow your selection down to a few safes, go to youtube and search on the safe manufacturer and model #. There's some videos out there showing how some common "cheap" safes can be opened with tricks like using coat hangers. Try to avoid getting one of those.

Still maximum OpSec on this? He's all over my facebook feed with postings, but never on anything related to this situation.

I have a single barrel break action. Works fine, recoil is like a gnat fart. .410 ammo is EXPENSIVE though. Price some out and compare it to 12/20 gauge.