bulpup

I was a huge fan of the Speer Gold Dots when i lived in New York because you could point to any police dept. In the state and NYC and they were using them and carrying off duty. NJ is all over the place when it comes to this. I found out here that Retired Jersey cops carry Federal EFMJ. The exact reasons, or even a fully vetted representative sample, is not verified. However, why would they do that? Has to be something. So if the law is uncertain and a jury would likely hear that a hollow point is a cop killer, or perhaps beleived all their life that they were illegal, I believe it is a good choice since there are very good rounds available that are not considered hollow points but do the same thing. I prefer to have a bullet that does what a hollow point does but simply does not have a hollow point. Should I ever be on the stand for protecting myself I want to have played the best cards I could and not be on the hook for New Jersey law's lack of clarity.

Venezuela?

Considering its a photo book with the name "Chicks with Guns," I thinh kyou might be happy.

I don't have that many mags but for things like mags I use these open hopper bins

Only thing I can think of of the top of my head is to check if a NY permit is needed to take the bike into the area you want to drive into.

Other: EFMJ means never having to say "but officer, they aren't hollow points."

If she really wanted to screw things up she would respnd sayig that your wife should never have a gun. Lazy is still a reason. I find when it comes to people writing things, especially to somehting like a police officer, that get a writer's block.

Tony Martin has been out of Jail for 8 years

I demand MORE!!!!

<sigh> sometimes I should just go to slep instead of be on the internet. I meant WSF does that better than HS-6.

Center justified bold text just annoys the hell out of me. Everytime I see it I think about the mushy gushy "kittie Cat" stuff my mother-in -law forwards to me with a plea to forward to everyone in the world. But anyway. Imagine living in this world http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2004/dec/12/ukcrime.prisonsandprobation

I have only reloaded about 900 rounds so far with al cheapo Lee Classic in 9mm. I started with HS-6 and that was a very good poweder loaded at the starting load with 124 grain hollow points. Then I got the WSF that everyone seems to like. Maks review aside the wsf runs through my powered dispenser much better than the HS-6. I felyt like I got much more consistant loads with it and after a while stopped weighing each load. Not earth shattering info, but I thought I would share

Why do I picture you wearing this on a T-shirt?

I was kind of a joke , oh well

Pretty good Police work, I think. Not much help for the victim but still, props where it is due. I wonder how one can be charged with murder and felony murder at the same time? Seems odd.

How's 'bout this?

Just make sure through all this that they also work on making sure that if it happens again that they wake up and the guy doesn't have their new shotgun in his hands. Sounds like a complete lack of security in that house.

Guys, seriously.. We all know the laws in New Jersey suck and have to change. That is a given. But to take that statement above and turn it into "Felons should be allowed to have guns after they serve their time," is the worst possible logic. Focus on getting the silly laws changed, don't be silly deciding which laws are silly. Personally, from all that I have read about the laws in pracice in New Jersey is that the laws regarding firearms are so vague that the officers on the scene are sometimes forced to say "let the judge decide." This means that although not convicted, you still end up arrested and gunless. But again, the answer to that isn't to say convicted felons should be allowed legal access to gun( a federal law) - The answer is to make the NJ laws less vague or remove them.

Thats a guy you should take shooting

Dude, I am a member of the NRA and I read all the literature. I am not that guy. chill... seriously. But as a member of the NRA and live-er of my own life I find their script kind of flawed. I am just trying to introduce a few things I have thought strongly about.

No, I did not meant for it to come of as such. Not at all. Believe me when I say I know exacly what you mean and totally agree. Mental illness is not at all like a low IQ. BUT, the context was that the person in the OP's article did not seem to have the faculties to come up with a better cover story than anyone else here would. I suggest that this person may in fact be legitimatly slower than normal. It does seem to fit to me, but I am not going to take a few ideas from classes I took and say "eureka!" BUT, It just seems like it could be true based on the story - cops don't want to say the previous conviction- possible felonious escape charge, admitting his own guilt without any thought that he could be arrested for what he says. Apart from that, and perhaps I should have said it earlier, I do firmly believe that everything anti-gunners fear about society having firearms stems from both professional and armchair psychology. A lot of this is not easily dismissed. We gun owners have to come to terms with the notion that 2nd ammendment, taken in its most literal terms, means that the mentally ill can buy a firearm. <edit> not to mention that some of us are willing to say with a straight face that three years in jail for a felony is the perfect way to wash clean a previous crime.. might as well give them a snubbie as a parting gift.> I do not believe that the anti-gun crowd has caught on to this or they would have articulated it as such, but as a son of two psychologists I can tell you that it floats in the air and we have to be ready for that arguement to be raised. I for one, do not believe that the answer is to say it was better in 1967. If we seek a true common acceptance of the 2nd ammendment and not endless litigation, WE have to be ready for the inevitable introduction of this arguement. And when I say ready for it, I mean we have to try to not sound like idiots.

My positions are quite clear and contained in the pages of this thread. Thay are not accusations and i am quite prepared to discuss them if you are prepared to read them. I am not interested in saying the same thing over and over again ad nauseum . It is boring to the forum and a waste of my time. So what do you want to know?

I will say it again and again and again. If you think that the mentally ill and convicted felons should have unfettered access to fire arms you making the anti's case for them.

i dunno. It would seem to me that if I was going to grab an able bodied person and force my way into their home i would restrain them just so they wouldnt call the cops, get to a baseball bat, knife or loaded firearm.