bulpup

i hope you don't mind me forwarding this to my mother in law. My wife requested I do.

You guys are correct. Of course the report is lacking quite a few details but I would not be surprised if this guy had a limited mental capacity, IQ and Crime This is not wholly accepted as truth, but it is generally accepted and found true most of the time. I don't know if you guys are sick of hearing me say it but, poor people without access to mental health care may never get the care they need if indeed they have a mental illness or limited intelligence. This is something I think about when I am forced to consider that anyone should be allowed to have a firearm, no questions asked. furthermore, from the same link and for further discussion's sake;

Nevada Appeal "excusive" video

False dilema and false choice - check your protocol 'droid You cant say anything is truth if you don't know what they are.

oh, you're one of those people. fantasizing absurd scenarios in place of real life is not truth, its masturbation.

Not buying it. But that didn't happen. Here's a scenario for you. Thousands of law abiding citizens align with the law and lawyers that have a ground breaking plan to force the issue to the Supreme Court. Would you side with them or the felon that went back for his loaded NJ illegal magazine that he accidentally dropped while on the beach ? Bonus points; do you think siding with both helps or hurts?

Knowing the law and not breaking it is the definition of "law-abiding citizen." It doesn't matter if you agree or disagree with it. Bring your own sandwich to the range so you don't accidently become a felon driving home from the range I will back faaaaar away from any "gun-rights advocate," that wants me to fall in line with letting convicted felons get access to guns after serving their time. That line of thinking takes our cause backwards.

Because they don't want people calling them stupid for mis-identifying "clips." I picture the reporter talking to the cops; Cop: "He said he was looking for a magazine." Journo: "He had thirty-one bullets in a Playboy or something?" C: "No, in a pistol magazine" J: "Guns & Ammo?" C: "No, in a pistol magazine, like this one." J: "OH! You mean a clip!" C: "No, a magazine." J" "err.. okay." <writes>'suspect was looking for a "magazine." J:

Best video copy I could find I saw a report on this this morning on the news. How scary is the above video? How scary is the response from the police and the commnity? self-defense class.

I suppose it is at that.

most of the "Chicks with Guns" thread

Something about this doesn't click. Of course there are many people with different talking points about defense etc and stress their points in different ways but I feel like he forgot something. You practice on center mass because it is the biggest target, and practicing that is a good practice for when you are absoluelty terrified. Something about talking like you can put one in the brains and skip the center mass is a little too Chuck Norris, if you ask me. And the way I look at it is, hitting the dot in a center of a center mass target is the same as having enough time to shoot a guy in the eyeball and plenty if I wanted to hit a guy a the face. But I am not so full of myself that I think I could do that when someone is shooting back. Center mass is to get hits in a "holy fugg!" fight. That's what I was taught anyway.

Private detectives (some) can get a name from a plate number. I would think though, if you wanted to get a restraining order you could go to the PD and have them run the plate for the name.

Heck, there are some ranges that I won't buy reloads from. As far as teaching goes, buy a book. Not trying to be flip, but it really does help get your mind right before you start.

http://co.suffolk.ny.us/police/onlineforms.htm This is suffolk County. Best thing aobut NY laws is that you don't have every police chief interpreting things differently.

Okay silly question, especially since it is a little off topic ( i already own a vest) if you got stopped on the way to a range with hollow points, or an AR and a vest, how do you think that would go over? Not how it is "supposed to go" but how it might actually go over.

yet another mentally ill person whose family did nothing. Not to mention he had been commited for a time in 2000 because he was thought to b3e mentally unstable. I have said it before and I will say it again, gun advocates need to get on board with keeping guns out of the hands of the mentally ill, not just criminals.

wheredoyoustand.com I saw this on a story about the newest Medal of Honor winner. A place to vote and post a comment. Just thought I would pass it along because I know how you all like to bring it to the masses. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXSek5-_AFY

I don't know why it has to be so difficult. Give the guy the wallet, he turns, you draw and aim then say "you forgot my Rolex!"

Edited due to the OP finding the same clip

They are issued to every soldier in the the Army these days. Might cause complications in people with shellfish allergies, at lest that was the case in '07.

more info. Williamson Daily

http://www.njfishandwildlife.com/dighnt.htm

Exactly. Not to mention, some people driving the speed limit in the left lane might be your parents, or my parents. All the people on this board talking about muzzle awareness and trigger discipline but tailgating or retaliating for tailgating on a highway is fine. Some silly s"it right there.

Anyone that tries to teach someone a lesson with a motorvehicle at any speed is reckless moron.