PeteF

The whole "common usage" is a red herring. SD is another. The 2nd is not about SD, its not about hunting, its not about common usage. It is to make sure the people have and retain the capability to throw off an oppressive government. Thats why it says "right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Not "the right to keep and bear man portable arms in common usage shall not be infringed." Remember when the USC was ratified, the most powerful arms in existence were cannons, which were often owned by individuals or groups of individuals.

Did you ever have the urge to reach thru multiple computer screens to smack the stupid out of someone? Got thru 30 seconds.

Went in today to pick up some snap caps. You know, support the local guy. ID required? Excuse me? They wanted my DL info so they could enter it "Into their system". Thanks but no thanks. Lost a customer.

Howdy Frank

Not staged. Woman was the soldier's fiance. https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/mary-mchugh-mourns-her-slain-fiance-sgt-james-regan-at-news-photo/74345338

Like it never happened before

3,13,16 are garbage questions. But I guess answered as best as possible given the choices. 3. The right of the people to keep and bear shall not be infringed. Only NJ can make regulations. Does not follow. 13. See #3, having to ask permission to exercise a right is unconstitutuonal 16. Judicial discretion in sentencing someone exercising a constitutional right? Yeah, no. I think you may have missed on: 15. Says you don't oppose new restrictions on .50 cal ownership

You have some way around the anti siphon?

Now that one is definitely stolen and will be used.