joejaxx

CONGRATS! I know you have been waiting for this!

I will take it I need another copy lol.

Hahahahahahaha The Second Amendment Foundation is keeping this country rolling with 2nd Amendment lawsuits!! When will they stop! hahaha Title: SAF SUES OVER MASSACHUSETTS GUN BAN FOR LEGAL ALIEN RESIDENTS Source: http://saf.org/viewpr-new.asp?id=354

I do not think people are going to take NJCSD seriously when they have things named like that. "Keyboard Commando Squad" sounds extremely mall ninja and less professional than I would think the New Jersey Coalition for Self Defense would like to present itself to members of the gun community and others.

This bill is no different than the Firearm Owner Protection Act. The FOPA only PROTECTS, reiterates and reminds through law that citizens have a rigiht to traveling interstate with firearms (ie putting something in law that should have been a DUH-COMMON-SENSE thought for everyone). This bill just says that anyone with a resident carry license has a protected right to conceal carry in any another state while following the laws of course (AGAIN putting something in law that should have been a DUH-COMMON-SENSE thought for everyone). I would be EXTREMELY concerned if they were trying to pass a national carry license. That would open up the door for what you are talking about. Here are some portions of the actual bill for those who have not seen it yet. Enjoy. For once the federal government (congress) is doing something that is actually its main job: Protection of the basic rights of citizens of the United States against those who violate them instead of the opposite. I am a bit disappointed that this does not cover all types of carry but I can see why they would just mention concealed carry (first steps + there are some states where you can only conceal carry etc etc etc). To bad America has seen fit to accept permitting and licenses which give permission for exercising of rights.

No you cannot:

Hello NorthernYankee: 1. The lower receiver is considered the firearm federally and in the State of New Jersey. 2. Let us look at 2C:39-1m: 3. Let us look at 2C:39-1w(5): 4. Now let us look at what is considered substantially identical since you obviously cannot have a named assault weapon but you can have a firearm which has cloned receiver of one without certain features: So since: 1. you have a AR lower which is considered a firearm, 2. a AR-15 lower receiver is a clone of a named assault weapon: IE "Colt AR-15 and CAR-15 series" from the list You cannot have a lower receiver plus two of the features that can be installed on the firearm according to 2C:39-1w(5) as that could be seen as constructive intent (remember now 2C:39-1w(5) says firearm not rifle, pistol etc). To further emphasize this point: If a criminal is pulled over with just a stripped AR receiver they will get weapons charges as it is considered a firearm.

Why do I get so happy whenever I hear the Second Amendment Foundation's name? Here is another example: Title: SAF FILES FEDERAL LAWSUIT AGAINST BLOOMBERG OVER GUN PERMIT FEES Source: http://www.saf.org/viewpr-new.asp?id=351

Yeap just look at the actual AG letter that people are only posting portions of and are not posting what comes BEFORE the feature ban lists!: Source: http://www.state.nj.us/lps/dcj/agguide/assltf.htm And this is why it is so important to KNOW this stuff. You could be setting yourself up to admitting to having an assault weapon when it is not even considered an assault weapon. Do you really think the prosecutor is going to tell you that it is not? or remember that this directive exists? or try to help you in your defense? You do know that this directive came along because of a lawsuit about the Assault Weapon Ban being unconstitutionally vague in terms of the firearms LISTED on the ban right? This is not directed at anyone in particular. I am just talking in general.

Besides the fact that the people in the NJSP Firearm Investigation Unit are frequently wrong and do not even know about directives that have come out of their own unit (of which I have had to notify them about and correct them on law recently): There are two directives (from the Attorney General AND New Jersey State Police themselves) that have come out that talk about how the feature ban is in direct relation with firearms that have receivers that are clones of things on the list. The Attorney General would not have been so careful to spell it out if they just wanted any of these features banned. Instead of talking about firearm clones, receivers and giving examples they could have just stated that all firearms that have these features are banned end of story but they did not. Even in another directive example, New Jersey State Police talks about receivers in relation to the feature ban. If this is truly the case with the New Jersey State Police then someone needs to call them up, tell them they are wrong and show them why they are.

It does not matter since the Sig Mosquito is not a clone of anything on the list anyway. Please look at the following example: 1. If he was looking at a TEC-9 or a MAC 10/11 pistol (which are both named assault weapons) that were actually named TEC-9 or MAC 10/11 on the receiver then it would be illegal to possess and purchase (without a proper AW license). 2. If he was looking at a TEC-9 or a MAC 10/11 pistol *CLONE* then he would have to be concerned about pistol features since the receiver is a *CLONE* of something on the list. 3. If he was asking about the legality of a Desert Eagle in .50AE that had a threaded barrel (a pistol that has two listed features) it does not matter since the Desert Eagle is not: 1. named on the list and furthermore 2. not a *CLONE* of anything named on the list.

For the New Jersey State Retail Dealer License read this starting with: "N.J.A.C. 13:54-3.1 Licensing of retail dealers; general" so you know what you are getting into. 062408_title13ch54.pdf

I CALL BULLTHIS SIR.

Title: M1911 pistol Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1911_pistol#Early_history_and_adoption

If you bought it in this state legally and used a permit to purchase then congrats it has already been registered

Here is an excellent open letter sent to a politician in Illinois by one of the plaintiffs of McDonald v Chicago. It is kind of long but it is definitely worth the read. http://onlygunsandmoney.blogspot.com/2011/03/open-letter-from-colleen-lawson-to.html

I wish more home invasions turned out like this one. More people need to stop criminals during the commission of their personal crimes. This guy was in and out of prison and was out on the street lol. Anyway here is the article. Just shows why you should be armed even in your own house and while answering the door (or do not bother answering the door for people you do not know): TITLE: Couple recount fatal fray at their Tierra Verde home Source: http://www.tampabay.com/news/publicsafety/crime/couple-recount-fatal-fray-at-their-tierra-verde-home/1158689

Too bad these are illegal in New Jersey hahaha

REPLY BRIEF to Opposition to Motion re 25 Cross MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by PAULA T. DOW, RUDOLPH A. FILKO, RICK FUENTES, EDWARD A. JEREJIAN, PHILIP J. MAENZA, THOMAS A. MANAHAN. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(SPELLMEYER, GREGORY) (Entered: 03/16/2011) gov.uscourts.njd.249720.35.0.pdf

Still informative for new shooters: PART ONE: PART TWO:

Still informative for new shooters (other than some of the outdated shooting grips ):

Thanks Ty for the mags they are great! They load to 15 rounds and not one round more Thanks for the fast turn around and shipping out of the mags the same day I ordered them. I will definitely order from you again.

Pretty sure the Hughes amendment (ban on new production civilian machine guns) is "legally unconstitutional" taking into account the Miller, Heller and McDonald court cases. Some one that is not a Class III FFL just needs to attempt to fill out a ATF Form 1 and sue now.