mipafox

It's not. If you leave a firearm with a resident of another state it is considered an interstate transfer under FEDERAL law (you know this of course) and requires an FFL to change ownership. Lawyers that know what they are talking about will tell you that if only you have access to it, and no resident of the other state does, it is not a transfer. As you know, there are exceptions for temporary loans for sporting purposes but that is not even remotely what is going on here. It's really stupid that you can't leave a gun with an out of state friend or family member but those are the laws. Practically speaking, the only way within reason you could be caught is if there is a crime committed of such severity that the cops call the ATF and requests a trace, and then starts trying to visit people to determine the chain of custody. Outside of somebody robbing a place with your gun or shooting somebody with it the chances are almost zero. But it's still a violation of federal law. I would not rely on a trigger lock but I don't know for sure. Seems like he would still have access to it. Lock it in a cabinet or something and keep the key.

Short answer: it should be out of his possession - locked up and he does not have the key. Doesn't have to be Fort Knox or anything, any accomadation will do.

Did the Indians piss on cats? What were their rules about possession and transport of bow and arrow? I never went anywhere near her purse, it was in the closet. I don't steal a broad's money after I do her. Well, most of the time. Taylor Ham bitches!

Only Bass Pro I've ever been in was in Rancho Dominguez and it was very large and well stocked. But I know they have a rep for being more pricey and a little more Fudd. I doubt this will go well. Most mergers don't anyway.

Well, the name of the town starts with piss, so... Are you supposed to piss the cat away? I don't get it.

Well, say, "Hi" to her for me. Taylor Ham!

Your momma told me Taylor Ham!

I have the Lage MAX-11 upper. Bought the Suomi drums but later decided that upper wasn't worth the cost. I've spent enough on FA. I have multiple calibers, including .22, and multiple uppers for everything.

I told you. A little youthful experimentation with a NAZI Skinhead in college does not count. You're young, far from home, lonely, confused, maybe there's a little weed, one thing leads to another...

You're not Israeli like "You don't mess with the Zohan?" I've never met a male hairdresser but when I see them on TV that's what I think of. No thanks, I already know plenty of Jews. Just curious.

Are you...um...well, you know...are you?

Oh, I missed the "client" part the first time. Drop it, never bring it up again. Unless they ask you a specific question about the subject. This is business, not politics.

She will say hammers and bats have legitimate purposes, while guns mostly do harm. As far as "gun violence" goes, this term and focus became ubiquitous in the late 90s. It certainly existed before. But in the late 90s, after being blugeoned by anti-gunners for decades, people started looking at the real numbers, the real trends, and violence rates in countries like ours other than the three the antis cherry picked. And our violence rates were still going down while others were on the rise. Antis quickly decided to focus on "gun violence" because they thought it would make their comparisons look better. It did not, but they still cherry picked their examples. The interesting and frightening thing is how easily we can be manipulated. In less than 20 years society has been brainwashed into believing that violence does not matter, only "gun violence" matters. There's no logic to that, but people take it as dogma. Sort of like how they convinced us in the past 10 years that it is immoral to deport illegal alliens (even though we always did it before for 80+ years) and "there's no way you can deport 11 million people" (even though Clinton deported 10 million and Bush deported 8 million). These ideas do not make sense on their face. It should be blatently obvious to anybody with an IQ over 100. Yet, they have managed to condition us into believe this garbage over very short periods of time. Scary. And they are clearly not finished yet. We have a new generation coming out of school soon, and you know what they have been taught.

Trend was unchanged after the ban. It was dropping before the ban, it was dropping at the same rate after the ban. I think gun violence started increasing a little later. Here is what you do. She needs a demo. Get a stick about 20" long, and shove it up her ass. If you ask these guys you will get your answer and the sources: enoughgun.com They have Australian gun stats down to wind direction.

Hope flourishes among the condemned.

PA Constitution - Article I Section 21 The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned. I don't know what would happen if you appealed your conviction AFTER you spent your 90 days in jail and gave your attorney $20,000 retainer to file the appeal. (cause you're not getting an appeal in 90s days) I don't know if it's been done. PA law specifically preempts local regulation of firearms. So that's a non-issue. No law preempts knives. Constitutional conflicts are usually settled via appellate courts. I know there are movements in PA to preempt local laws on knives and other things but I don't think they have a lot of momentum at this time. Regaining liberty is a slow process and when the governor is illegally not passing budgets for a year after they are due the legislators have difficulty getting a coalition to work on such matters. Also, since it only applies to Philly, and 80% of the people in Philly would probably support the law if they knew about it, the priority is rather low. This is not something I know much about except JAIL. That is really the important concept.

And if they bleed out on the lawn you don't have to spend the rest of the night cleaning the carpet.

Ambush is different. You are in the open, presumably in the worst possible location, and really don't have a lot of choices. She had a number of choices, including hanging out at a choke point and picking them off one by one or keeping them at bay while waiting for cops. Although it would probably only take one dropped for them to leave. Her tactics certainly worked. I think she got shot (grazed) in the head.

3% of gun owners believe the "results" of this survey are accurate.

I'm happy for you guys. I know this has pissed you off for a long time. Of course, I'd be happier if Jersey issued permits.

Although it does not apply directly to handguns, I would have brought it if I had it. Cops like to inspect documents. If something weird happened I would show it to them. It might calm them down. And Jersey.

They are probably saying to each other, "What the heck is up with Jersey?"

It's of ordinary length but the girth of a canned ham.

No idea about Jersey laws, but people shoot yotes with .22 rimfire. I would use something larger, though.

I heard nobody even threw anything at them. Where's Shawn? why doesn't he check in on his phone? He shoulda thrown some shit.