theRU

No i did not..i just thought it was a good site. Nothing peaves me more tho then people spitting out false information. I see lunkers point, however he contructs his argument first by stating that RU axed sports in favor of football and that was a poor decision, but his end point seems to be that taxes shouldnt funds sports at all. So while he wants more athletics at the school he doesnt want to pay for them. I wonder how he would feel if i demanded the same of his finances.

We agree to disagree. At the same time i cant help but feel that if the state announced tomorrow it was investing in shooting ranges around the state you would have absolutely no problems with that.

One last bit of info...lets just assume that the entire budget of the athletic dept is tax payer money... then We the people contributed 50 Million to support sports in 2008. From the RU website: "Over the past five years, outside revenue generated by the athletics program has jumped 101 percent

Here are some Tidbits: Rutgers has 24 intercollegiate sports(after 6 were cut), far more than most of its peer institutions. In fielding 24 men

Im sure Xanadu was a better use of his money.. also stop using the "football killed other sports" arguement because thats false as well. Are athletic dept. fund limited? Yes, so sacrifices had to be made. If you are sorry to see other sports get axed, complain to the Politicians who keep cutting funding. Want to do some research???? look up how many sports Texas or USC or Michigan or Ohio St. have, and then look up their athletic budgets. Their budgets are double what RU has, yet fund nearly the same amount of sports!!!!!!!!

Let me also add that its the only thing that your tax dollars are helping to support that has any chance of actually paying dividends. If you were anyway involved in the state university you would know that Rutgers has had its state funding slashed year after year, and the only hope for the school to support itself and reduce the tax burden is a successfull football program... Just look at Michigan, ohio st., texas, bama to see what i'm talking about.

its not tacticool

You sir are ignorant

If anybody is a fan: http://www.rutgerschop.com/Dev/

Welcome

lets see how many we can get on the list so that we can make a push for this in the fall.

Happy Birthday!

its just something i noticed..and when i say fireball..i mean fireball..i could actually feel extra heat from the flame on my hand.

Anybody else shoot this and have massive fireballs coming out of a 1911??? I shot mag tech FMJ, and Winchester HP and didnt have this problem. Is it just the ammo??

Manuals are an option..reason being at least in the r/t the engine that uses an auto tranny has MDS, basically cylinders shut off to maximize fuel efficiency.. so if you get the manual you get more power, but slightly worse gas mileage. I just drove a stick yesterday, most of them on the lots have sticks.

Also, i'm not sure if you are aware, but the Gm car head units, specifically in the camaro, are Intergrated with the DIC controls. Removing the headunit would result in the loss of function in the DIC where you can control multiple functions of the car. I've heard of people haveing to relocate the headunit in the trunk just so the DIC works, before installing aftermarket up front. In my opinion that is just a HUGE PIA..and you are further reducing a non existant trunk. I dont think you can go wrong with any of the 3, but for me personally i think the challenger addresses more of my needs and wants... which sucks because i wont be taking advantage of the GM employee discount on my next purchase.

Doesnt have a manual??????? where'd you get that information?????

I think i'm going with the challenger over the others... I dont know how the camaro doesnt offer navigation... i like my tech gadgets and when i found out they did not offer Navi i crossed it off my list. I then took a look at the terrible mustang interior and walked away as well.

-My Rutgers tix -Boating -Formula 1 Grand Prix -Shooting

i have to say those are really good commercials.. i'm a gm guy too. Let me also add that I love retro styling cues, however i hate the retro interiors. I would have to say the challengers interior offends me the least, and the mustang interior offends me the most. Which is a shame because i would really love to get a camaro but the interior just kills it for me.

another reason this state is garbage

disgusting...i'm all for someones right to protest war, or be a proponent of peace. But actions like these are show poor taste, and no class.

this maybe a stupid questions but how do you know if you can take a 45 acp + p round in your pistol?

If someone wants to create a cut and paste email to send the council members please post it here as well. I'll get a bunch of eb residents to email them.

all the mexicans can go to hell..stay home