Krdshrk

Yikes. I know exactly where that is....

Thank you, Anthony! I listened to it all - my notes: Still the beginning of the case. There's still a lot to fight for until we get the final ruling. NJ is appealing the PI to the 3rd circuit, but the case is still not complete. Judge Bumb still needs a factual record - additional discovery and evidentiary hearing. The court can potentially change their mind and take away places to carry (though it's not likely). We could potentally get more places allowed to carry. The judge has not expressed an opinion either way. Regarding private property - there are 2 different types of people: invitees and licensee. A licensee is someone who has explicit permission. An invitee has implied permission. For example a Burger King - nobody has to tell you that you have permission to enter. It's implied permission and considered the default rule. The state attempted to change the default rule that says if there is not explicit permission that you're not allowed. The state even tried to put in an Amicus Curaie brief arguing the that the state gets to take the decision from the actual private property owner if they're not there to grant explicit consent. Judge Bumb saw through that and struck it down as it would be a flat out ban on carry. The court made a distinction of property held open to the public. The 3 types are: Commercial property open to the public, Commerical property not open to the public, and private property. Commercial property open to the public - for example a Burger King. They can kick you out, but you cannot be charged as a trespasser just for entering the property. Commercial property not open to the public - EG a Warehouse, Office, etc - you need to have credentials to enter - a key card, etc. You still need explicit permission to enter. Residential property is not open to the public, but the court refers to the curtailage - the walkway, the driveway, the front steps, the yard... The UPS driver has to walk up to the door to deliver a package. They have no way of getting permission without going up and knocking on the door. So the same way a Burger King is open to the public, the curtailage of a property is open to the public. If you have to unlock a door, swipe a card key, etc - it's not open to the public. We got more out of the PI than the TRO. The court concluded that the injury claimed was not likely to arise in the short time frame. This is why we got more in the PI vs the TRO. Regarding Dr's offices - Schmutter disagrees with the opinion however we have plenty of time to sway the court to our position that it's a single prohibition that covers the whole thing vs getting access to only a select list of medical facilities. If you're likely to go to one of the medical facilities listed and a member of ANJRPC (or for that matter CNJFO, FPC, SAF, etc) - email [email protected] - you can provide an affadavit and can provide assistance to the case to demonstrate standing. We did not get wildlife refuge's covered in the PI as the case does not have anyone demonstrating standing that they are planning on going to one of these places and can't carry. Dan will be putting out a call and listing all of the places so that we have more support to provide standing. There is a 2 gun limit on the firearms you can carry. If there are more guns in the car - there is a distinction on what you're carrying vs not carrying. The state will be requesting appealing the PI - requesting a stay pending appeal - which would stop the PI ruling until the appeal is ruled on. If the stay is granted to the state - the law would go back into effect nullifying the PI, and all restrictions would go back into affect. Pay attention to what happens to this. Mag ban case - the 3 cases have been combined for discovery - The Mag ban case, ANJRPC's Assault Firearm case, and FPC's Assault Firearm case. The 3 cases are combined for discovery - exchanging reports, evidence, etc. The schedule has been set - Discovery wraps up and file dispositive motions by September, and will be heard by the court in October. The motions have the potential to resolve the cases in entirety. There is the possibility that the cases may be resolved in October.

Call up Steve @ Monmouth Arms.

She didn't say that at all - she said she flags the possibility that shall issue statutory laws because permitting schemes can be put towards abusive ends. She also put the burden on the state government to come forth with the historical tradition of gun regulations that justify putting restrictions on our right to carry. This is HUGE. The Shall Issue Permitting laws need to be looked at in a case-by-case basis. That puts it out there that NJ's requirements are potentially unconstitutional. While we have some unclassified an restrictive policies put on us to obtain our CCW - it could be worse - look at NY. Bumb is specifically putting out her opinion on this to prevent that from happening here in NJ... And potentially making it even easier for us. It's just going to take time. Keep the faith. Yes - ranges are using this as an economic windfall - good for them. Capitalism. It's up to you to find alternative methods on how to get qualified.

Protip - watch it at 1.5x speed.

From Facebook (Ed Berrios did a phenomenal interpretation that made it much easier to understand):

Watch at 1.5x speed but I think I have it timestamped pretty well. Default property rights rule - Judge Bumb rejected all associated with this. States areas open to the public - eg stores, gas stations, etc... It also reads (to me) as open land property as well. If you get pulled over and have to stop along the side of the road in a rural area - you don't know who you need to get permission from, so that can't be held against you. I'm still waiting on more clarification but this is how I read it. I could be wrong - IANAL.

This 100%

Here's a fanny pack option. https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsCZmjYI5l-/

Premier memberships are at the store at the top - or click here. https://www.njgunforums.com/forum/index.php?/store/category/1-premier-membership/

If you're free Tuesday night I may be at SCFGPA. I don't have a Shield EZ or PDP-F but I have a Shield and regular PDP (Full size). One gun you may want to look at is the Sig P365XL Comp Rose. I shot it at the SIG event and saw some of the promo going on with Lena Miculek who collaborated with SIG on the build so that it's a great system for Women shooters. I don't have the exact model but I have a similar one (P365 X Macro and swapped to a Wilson Combat P365XL Grip module). Very nice shooter. Let me know if you're able to come out. You're more than welcome to try out my carry guns.

It is a great org but their insurance doesn't cover NJ

The P227 was only made for about 6 years and discontinued in 2019 so before the big pistol mounted optics boom. Never was around in great numbers anyway. I HAVE heard that a P220 slide will fit on a P227... the two guns share almost all parts, including barrels. The only difference is the P227 has the double stack capacity frame. See if you can find a P220 slide? There's even a Legion version that is optic ready.

Doesn't matter as the magazine is inside the pistol grip. You would need to have one without the threaded barrel, however. If it has a threaded barrel, a thread protector or muzzle device would need to be welded on.

Could go with a MasterPiece Arms MPA30T or MPA30DMG. Those are legal.

Banned by name. Uzi Type Semi-Automatic Firearms

Hmm that's not that bad... you gotta get a newer processor though! That thing's your bottleneck right now. I've plugged my setup into an undersized UPS before just to test - it started alarming instantly.

True - it's not using 750W constant, but definitely uses more than the 210W the existing UPS is rated for, especially if the monitors are plugged in to it too. I would go with the Cyberpower - it should last a few minutes with the load.

PHLSTER has an Enigma Express holster for S&W J-Frame.

If it's a CS350, your PC's power supply overloaded the UPS immediately. It's rated for 210W max. Your PC's power supply is 750W. Going by the model Cyberpower you linked - You'll get about 5 minutes if that's the only thing plugged in. https://www.cyberpowersystems.com/tools/runtimes/ According to APC's page - the Back-UPS you have there will last 6min 10s with a 750W load. I'm assuming you're connecting just the PC - if you add any monitors or any other devices, the runtime will definitely drop. https://www.apc.com/us/en/product/BR1500MS2/apc-backups-pro-1500va-900w-tower-120v-10x-nema-515r-outlets-avr-usb-type-a-+-c-ports-lcd-user-replaceable-battery/?%3Frange=61888-backups-pro&parent-subcategory-id=88975&selected-node-id=27590292604

Entire series is available right now for 48H (I'm in Episode 6 btw) https://www.firearmsandfreedoms.com/viewing/replay/

What do you have right now? Gen 3? Can try some of my mags before dropping any money. Also maybe try Magpul GL9's

Yes

Yep no issues. I use G19 Gen 5 mags. No issue with my G48 either.

I don't think so. let's let @ESB be the guinea pig