JSF01

^That is how I understand it, and so far have not had any problems buying any firearm I want out here in MT. In fact I just recieved an antique firearm in the mail today, which reminds me I need to update the arms race thread.

I am going to guess that stealing the bike was the plan, not saying they may not have done something else as well, but considering they had a woman in the truck with them, it lowers the probability.

The only thing I have are the initials and from what I know is that M1917's were used into WWII For SP's which is almost 30 years, so trying to figure out who may have had would be difficult. Do you know of any data bases with a list of military personnel between 1917 and 1945? It would be fun to try to take a stab at it.

The only clue to the guns history I have are the initials WCS carved it the handle

Well I just added number 5 for the year S&W M1917

This is my Zombie Crushing Vehicle an 1984 M1009. Basically it’s a Chevy Blazer with a 6.2 diesel, a heavier duty trans and suspension then the civilian model, brush guard, and a M16 gun rack.

It looks like the guns are rated by the users of the site. What I don't see is an option to write a review. A written review would be alot more helpfull to those looking to purches a new gun.

In all honesty I was not that impressed the only reason I did not get all of them is because it was spot the sniper and not sniperes. I easially picked out multiple spots that I thought was very likly a sniper before i picked my final guess was the "one sniper" most of them are fairly easy to spot as the color of thier ghillie suits was a little off. Some of the though did a pretty good job. Now grateed if i was not looking for a sniper I probably not spotted any of them, though on the flip side If some one is not looking for you some basic camo clothing could do the same thing.

How can they afford all these law suits? They have like 50 going on at once.

This is completely unrelated to the topic but When I read the title of the thread somehow I read pisspot--> don't know how, must mean I like my job or something. Oh well back on topic, personally I believe pot should be legalized because it would help more than it would hurt us in the long run.

don't get your hope up to much that we are smarter, just search bullet proof vest and see how many people test them by having some one wearing them

Don't remember what the first gun other then it was a 12 gauge pump action that hurt like hell and was very heavy to hold at the time. I was 10 or 11 years at the time and it was with the boy scouts. I was then switched to a 20 gauge H&R Topper (or something extremely similar) still hurt like hell though.

I use to get phone calls from some automated system telling me the manufacturer warranty had expired act now to extend it. I would always just LOL and think to myself which vehicle are they talking about my 1984 Chevy M1009 from a time period American manufactures would probably like to pretend never happened or my 1972 Morris Mini which manufacture was bought out, merged, then bought out again. Why would this extended manufacture warrantee not be legit

Here in MT it $4.00 a gallon for diesel

It is rated PG-13. I have not seen it yet, but going tomorrow. I know that a lot of reviews have slammed it, I think it’s only 20% on rotten tomatoes, But the one reviewer that I always go by because even if i don't fully agree with his reviews usually is still pretty close to what I end up thinking says it is a must see. Basically according to what he says it sounds like many people are going into the movie with a number of assumptions already determined on what the movie is, and therefore actually failing to analyze it to understand the meaning behind it. It also does not help that its target audience is about 15-30 years old, so the older generations probably would not “get” a lot of it any way. Fortunately for me I am within the target audience and that I enjoy analyzing movies to fully understand them. Of course that can sometimes come back to bite like Star Trek where I left the theater having enjoyed the film but when I got home I was disappointed with it.

Picked up a M1903A3 which brings me to a totat of 4 guns this year. 1. M1903A3 2. Type 99 3. Mas 36 4. M91/38

Isn't this how its always been, because I remember when I first got my checking account with Commerce they said I had to keep a minimum about of money in the account forgot the amounnt as i always kept a bunch of mony in it.

Well after a day of searching I found some at http://www.buffaloarms.com/ its $29 for a box of 20. Not the best price but I figured it will hold me over until cheaper ammo comes available.

100% agree with you. In fact a goal for every one of us should to take every one of our friends to the range at least twice in an attempt to get them at least interested in shooting if not become shooters themselves. On top of that maybe inviting some people that you are just acquaintance with to go shooting. The more people that we can get interested in shooting the less we will have to worry about stupid laws like this.

While I would not mind seeing the list unfortuntly I don't have any room in my apartment.

Well the good news is if they use assault clip we can all point out that there has never been a crime where the bad guy used a clip with more than 10 rounds. Possibly even go as far as saying there is no such thing as a clip that holds more than ten rounds, though I can’t say that with certainty I just can’t think of any.

Good reason but there are plenty of othe firearms I want so thats not quite good enough of a reason

So does anyone know of any websites that are selling 7.7 Jap ammo? Much preferably under $20 for 20 but I'd go up to $30. Out of all my rifles only the type 99's ammo is eluding me, and I would really like to fire it. (Technically I have a box of twenty but that won’t last long)

I want to know where they got that term from. I mean who in the world calls them big bullet blasting boxes. It doesn't even make sense in any way you try to think about it. Did they get it from some five year old who was talking about guns? The only other theory i have for the term is that they are trying to create a new term for high capacity magazines to try to fool the public that they are something else, i.e. calling certain rifles assault weapons to fool people into thinking they are assault rifles. If that’s the case though they failed miserably (not that I mined them failing) because big bullet blasting boxes sounds a whole lot less scary then high capacity magazines. Of course perhaps it’s some pro gun people just messing with them in which case then I will be LMAO @ them. Now that I think about it that would be an awesome plan. A Bradley representative goes into a debate on some news station and says “Big Bullet Blasting Box” they would automatically lose all credibility and therefore the debate.

Thats one nice looking shotgun. Now just need to figue out a good reason to buy one.