JackDaWack

Not sure what you're saying? You're arguing the government should register every gun you own because your DL has a number on it? Your DL doesn't say which cars you can drive, as long as they are "passanger vehicles". In fact you can drive any vehicle legally owned by you or anyone without being charged as "unlicensed".

Which makes zero sense. The approval date of the application, is not the same as the issuance date of the permit. I would contended with the courts that they are falsifying records. At the very least the permit is only issued when a judge signs it. IF the above were to remain, then we could argue we can carry once the permit is approved by the PD if they are back dating the issue date of permits.

I would add that a background check is an administrative process that the judiciary is told was completed through approval of a application. ANY PD being requested this information should do what was done prior and refuse.

1998? Things are much different now. NICS... is INSTANT.. The only reason it takes long in NJ is because they made it, even then it's only max a couple days at its worst. Pre pandemic, NJ NICS took an hour or two. That argument wouldn't fly anymore if challenged.

Ooops. Someone's ass is gonna feel that.

When I spoke with them, it sounded like it wasn't going through the normal channel they have established for FARS. So someone in the records department is handling it, then probably passing it off to the PD.

That's why I bought my house at the top of a hill. The basement will never need a sump pump. I literally refused to buy a house that had one installed, or appeared to require one. Not much land is flat here, which sucks on some other levels for the kids to play, but the peace of mind is worth it. For a lot of people they kind get stuck buying where ever is convenient, water damage ain't no frigging joke.. growing up my parents house always had water issues with a shallow water table and brook running through the back yard.

Nj is its own district. So the decision will have no impact on NJ until it's elevated to the appellate court, we share the same circuit not "district". Federal districts make up the circuit.

The applicant must agree to any "grace period" beyond the 60 days, as per the statute for carry permit apps. I would say the 60 days starts once a completed application is in the hands of the administrative agent(PD, NJSP).. that would mean prints are done etc.

I had no issue reading the title it says felony "defendants". I dont see how this would lead to anything considered "backlash", if anything we should be arguing with the judge that until due process is completed the individual retains their rights... they can still vote under indictment after all.

I would love to call and complain, but my app was only submitted 2 weeks ago.

Didn't NJ pass a law that you can't publish their privates addresses? But of course the entire SCOTUS is broadcasted.

Keep in mind Bruen explicitly states that each state can have a permitting process, but it can't be a "burden" or take a long time.. By those terms you could argue a violation of civil rights, and that you carrying a firearm is constitutionally protected without the permit.

I would argue to prevent catching a charge for brandishing a firearm, among other charges like causing public panic etc. As rediculous it may sound You live in NJ, remember.... people don't want you to have a gun and feel threatened by them. What "Must" be done to prevent you from a set of silver bracelets will require a lot of care with the way we will be treated, and the examples being sought.

When you have a ND I'm sure that will be an excellent question and point for a Jury. Does it have to be in a holster when transfer to a lock box/trunk? No. I think the point is the inability to claim someone is brandishing a weapon which is a crime. You fall outside that requirement when you have a PTC.

It one of things related to maintaining control of your weapon, you can catch any number of charges being a threat to the public. It's also just common sense and really stupid to argue not using a quality holster anyway.

NJ issues a permit to carry. There is no law that says it must be concealed or not. A holster is pretty straightforward, it retains the firearm under less than ideal situations. Make your own if you want.

Wut.

Easy. It's because the courts are simply stalling.. the courts have to issue permits at some point.. ANJRPC isn't going to make that happen faster. If they filed a suit, it wouldn't go anywhere for a few months. The state will seek relief from the suit and claim they are "working on it", "these things take time". In the end it will be a massive waste of resources. For now, I don't think enough time has passed to convince another Judge that such a case would hold enough merrit.

I would be curious, in a place like NJ that isn't allowed to create public list of gun owners, would it even be legal?

Who better? Who better than SCOTUS? Judges are free to apply all applicable laws that do not interfere with the ruling of Bruen. These Judges aren't idiots who need someone to tell them what to do, they widely do what ever they want until something occurs where they don't have that option anymore and now require "guidance", because they know damn well they can't do what they want to on their own. Anything less/more is malicious, IMO.

Get a small pistol lock box that fits in the bag. Or... just wear the pistol?

How does that argument fair by having a gun on your hip while walking literally anywhere and being stopped by a police officer? The argument made was with respect to the bar set for obtaining search and seizure privileges. I would also expect that during any stop they would have the ability to remove a firearm from your possesion until they are done. Although even that I don't agree with.

UPS charged me 2.50 x 3. Not sure where you went but there is a UPS in nearly every town.

Well on the positive side, NJs bail reform costs you nothing and you wouldn't have to wait in jail for the outcome.