JackDaWack

i dont know if you could even remotely compare the 2 in this instance.. 4 dollars more from natches is different then 55 dollars more from CTD.. the idea that im paying 16 bucks for shipping is getting to me more, its expected that ammo is going to be inflated i wouldn't say natches is gouging here, but i would say they are ripping you off with shipping. and you used to be able to pick this stuff up a year ago for like just under 4c a round.

100's still in though. You can get 5 packs for the price of one over at CTD.... laughable considering i still think 62 bucks shipped for 500rnds of .22lr is expensive..

Depends, RCA is the actual connector like you said... but then you have composite and component cables.. They are both completely useless unless your trying to hook up something older. A cheap HDMI cable will work just as good as a quality component cable.

depends on why you feel that way. I would say no based on the idea of crime. But those cities do elect horrible politicians. Even if they were safe cities, you would still see them lean democratic because of the vast low income areas.

To be fair... it wasn't even packed! They threw the shipping label right on the stock box. When i ordered mine from midway the stock box came in an actually shipping box, alone. and a second box was delivered with a bunch of other stuff. The retarded part is that the hornady box is paper thin on the top, and uses typical carboard for the box, nothing i would ship anything in to begin with let alone a press. by no means is that even close to shipping standards...

Probably a Viera? I have the 42" version from way back when..still competes IMO with the stuff coming out today.. just paid like 3x more.

I will holster carry outside, but in house I keep a pistol ready to go in short reach.

Your data looks fine out of the 92 except for a few inconsistencies with col and fps. Probably a small charge variation. But a 125gr bullet should stabilize at 1100fps. You do notice the lower fps with a longer col. But that's assuming you used the same exact charge.

I did a little digging. http://www.practicalhandgun.com/vihtavuori-n320-ipsc-loads.html this data shows a shorter COL. Griz is probably right.

I'm kinda in shock, i've gone my entire life pissing outside in wooded areas and never though twice about it... if i'm away from a toilet, am i really going to waste time and energy finding one just so i can piss down a hole? just to find myself back outside? People are too subjective, it's something we all do every day... just because you never see a girl sh*t doesn't mean she don't sh*t... if you get what i mean. If you don't see my wanker i really don't see what the problem is.. Now, number 2 is a completely different story.. although i have crapped in the woods, but my only other choice was in my pants...so i think i made an appropriate decision. THAT, was not fun. Although in my defense the bathroom was locked.

Rifling all gunked up with lead? Did you work the load up? Bullet isn't stabilized which means it could be over powered/pressure..

http://www.casesbysource.com/product/hardigg-12-pack-transport-rifle-rack-m4-m16-case-black-472-m4-m16-12-blk much better then the brand new price of $1,400.. lol. Some of those single rifle pelican cases go for 300 bucks... I personally never had a need for such an extravagant case for one rifle, let alone for 12. I understand people use these as shipping containers, but that's about the only reason to pay such a high premium.

Hardigg made these cases, i guess when pelican bought them they continued to make them.... looks like it's the same case with some minor differences.

But then you have to worry about the splash back... i always aim for an appropriate surface that keeps my feet dry.

So i guess skinny dipping is out of the question?

grab a used one for $240! http://www.ebay.com/itm/Hardigg-Pelican-Mobile-Military-Armory-472-M4-M16-12-Airsoft-Rifle-Gun-Case-A-/360636678641 ouch $80 for shipping...

The camera isn't even centered on the rifle...

No Bail? Man, he must have really pissed them off.

No right is truly inalienable. If rights were inalienable then it would be acceptable practice that NO person can be prohibited from owning a firearm. If you really believe that every single person no exception can possess one, then i can follow your argument. However, i sit here and ask myself, why would anyone ever try to illegally transfer a weapon when they can do it legally... the obvious answer is they probably are not allowed. It's not a given, but the assumption could be made. Maybe you could forgive me for thinking i could do my part by trying to keep guns out of the hands of people who feel the need to fuel the anti's. NJ's purchase laws are redundant to the point of retardation, however, every single person here was able to follow the law and exercise their rights.. the purchasing process doesn't infringe the right to own anything, maybe you could argue the cost, and it doesn't prohibit anyone that any other state wouldn't. The problem we have in NJ is simply the amount of time the process takes.

Supporting the enforcement of the law and calling someone out who is more then willing to break the law is not the same thing as supporting the law. You cannot make someone a criminal either, only their actions can do that. The law is dumb, but if you break it that makes you a criminal, that in turn means another criminal with a gun. Sorry I'm kinda sick of my rights being eroded away by criminals. Would you tell someone if u saw a drunk guy stumble out of a bar with his truck keys in hand? I

A 200 lumen light may or may not blind you will force you to squint and will be hard to see anything behind it, a 600 lumen light will blind you AND force you to close your eyes or look away. Someone can still aim and shoot at a lower lumen light even if they can't see you. The higher the lumens the more it forces people to take actual blind shots. A tactical light is twofold. Blinding the target and illuminating them. With new lights out now I won't buy anything under 400 lumens and for multi purpose I buy the dual output lights. Or have smaller lights that last longer. The fact is the new lights run just as long as the older ones. LEDs are very efficient and you can get alot more power out of them today for the same runtime.

so you have no issue with anyone buying a gun from anyone? figure this guy could be normal could be a psychopath could be mentally inept could be a felon. But hey we're the problem! Getting the proper paperwork may take time but is certainly not difficult. So I question why this guy can't use the legal channel? And this is the stuff that fuels new laws. People buying and selling guns illegally FTF. I for one do not come from the idea that all people can exercise all rights. Rights come with the price of responsibility. If this guy is not prohibited nothing is infringing on his rights if he wants to responsibly exercise his rights. Sorry not a fan of people who cut corners and ruin it for everyone else.

Waiting on a bunch from that pre-order too.... guh..

I'm waiting for them to update the design...i love the rifle, but i hate the molded sights. if the price dropped i could probably justify one too.

Is it just a coincidence that the system is fixed when legislation is supposed to be voted on?