JackDaWack

yeah, and just imagine how much that would fk'n cost! 1in steel.... she gets dumber by the secondssss

The second a .223 hits anything of substantial material, its literally explodes... unless its AP.

you wouldn't get edible eggs if the roosters were present, you would have baby chicks. hence why the light test was invented. You DO need sunlight.

it's not any type of adhesive, it's laser etched.

Hey Dads out there, here's an idea!

Don't be so quick, there are cases out there where youngsters grab the parents gun to defend against an intruder... I mean, yeah a certain age should be implemented, but we also go for the term "minor" and not "child". There should be an appropriate age, but then u still deal with maturity issues.

received my FDE mags, thanks! great mags as always.

I wondered the same... also, a TON of brand names are popping up that i have never seen before.

buy a stream light pro tac. It's bigger, and requires a mount, but its about 3x brighter. Cost is the same if u buy a mako mount.

Yes, you can ship them to an FFL if they do compliance work.

I think Or IIRC the problem with c-product mags is with the .22lr mags they make for the ruger and the conversion .22 mags for AR's. I haven't herd anything about the standard AR mags.

http://www.laughload.com/csi-logicd.html I just wasted a solid hour on this site.

If that happened here, the guy would probably get off for police brutality...

I think the "spread the wealth" socialist perspective in this situation is kinda off. He's not advocating you do anything with your guns. he simply believes that everyone should have the opportunity to buy one if they want one. A lot of places put purchase limits on items in these hard times.

i was just at BH, and someone stated that living in NY was like living in America... the fugg.... don't listen to people unless your informed.

Wow, $400+ for a simple membership? and you still have your friends pay $15 to share a port? $75 bucks to bring your kid!? no rifle... They make RSTP look like a bargain that's for sure. I see no benefit here, i would rather just go with a friend and we both pay for a port each. All those "discounts" i would never use, don't have kids, i never rent guns, and i never buy ammo by the box... Are they making 2 ranges? one that has A/C and one that doesn't?

FA weapons are accessible, maybe not here, but in other states. I would argue that military personnel actually deal with different threats then we do here domestically, so the idea that i need a grenade launcher and so on..... would be a little misplaced. Also, a gun is tool you use on the job, but it is a tool that everyone uses for protection. No one should have to suffer from these restrictions, not LEO not no one.

It's a rather simple idea, i'm not sure why its flying so high. You have 2 separate ideas here, the fact that LEO's encounter more threats, and the fact that in the state of NY and NJ we have a duty to retreat WHEN POSSIBLE, and no duty to retreat inside your residence. I'll just enforce what i have been saying this entire time... You may deal with way more threats then your average person, but that doesn't change the fact that your average person doesn't deal with those same threats, no matter how less often. If you need something to deal with a threat, then it would be logical to say that i need that same thing to deal with a threat.... Even if i only need it once, and you need it a thousand times. What's not to get about that? Your not dealing with all these threats at once, you deal with them on a case by case basis, just like we do. How does the fact you deal with threats more often mean that those individual threats are any greater then the ones we deal with? How does being exempt contribute to the frequency of threats you deal with? it doesnt matter. how does being exempt contribute to individual threats you deal with? Increases your potential for self defense and the likely hood of survival. I dont want to see LEO's loose rounds from there magazines.. i want these expemtions to be called what they are, removed...and i want everyone to have what they need to protect themselves..... that is what this is about... people just think it is funny, ironic, retarded etc.. when leo's are given a taste of what it feels like to be us, complain that it puts them in danger, and have no comment on how it relates to everyone that is not a criminal, its selfish attitude and they are not defending rights, they are defending their privileges. When i read about when LEO's step up, it puts a big smile on my face because they are a credible entity that can greatly impact the rights of all individuals.

Let's step away from that. It's not relevant, and i looked at it from a more respectable stand point, I'd rather people take a step back then incite a flame war. people are just really fed up with this idea the LEO's have more rights to self protection(as evident here). A threat is a threat is a threat, if you can justify saying an LEO needs weapon X to stop a threat, then we need weapon X to deal with that same threat. The criminals don't discriminate, why should we? LEO's could really be on our side here, and they are! all over the country. So we can't be so black and white about it.

actually, since cops are trained, dont they need less rounds then the average citizen? sorry not trying to be a dick or attack LEO's in any manner, but there is no consistency with these arguments at all. We all should have access to what ever an LEO has access to, we live in the same place as them and are threatened by the same people, again we can argue the frequency, but the fact is nothing a cop encounters couldn't happen to average joe. The idea here is equal opportunity of self defense.

just because they may need more rounds on a day to day basis, doesnt mean i dont need more rounds the one if any time in my life i need them just like they do. There is no justification here. If a cop needs more then 7 rounds to stop a threat, then any person would need more then 7 rounds to stop a threat.... the frequency of threats has ZERO to do with it.

I'd like to see how they FIRED him for that.. Ask yourself, is your job more important then doing the right thing? Are these privileges used to keep LEO's from doing the right thing(generalization)? I would be pretty happy to NOT have to work for someone who is such an A$$ Hat. But that's just me.

Any LEO from NY could have stood up proudly and claimed that 7rnds limits your ability to self defense, but that's not the argument i have seen at all.... it would seem that, in this case it could have helped us greatly, but they decided to take the low and easy road to getting their privileges back that should be a right int he first place for everyone. I have no sympathy for this because the fact is it doesnt' help us either to sit by and be OK with this, and have them yet again spit in the face of your citizen with the weak argument that they are some how better then us and can therefore be exempt.

Plenty of people have asked why i need an assault rifle. i don't bother with arguing what an assault rifle is but my rebuttal is usually... why do i need a reason to own it? people buy shit all the time they don't need... I then ask, why shouldn't i own an assault rifle.... i have yet to get a response from anyone that has to do why I shouldn't, just the usual it will stop murders from happening... i chuckle... they get mad.