JackDaWack

You'd think we never discussed use of force on this forum for home protection or something, lol..... or use of force in general...

Yeah, If I dont feel threatened why would I give up the vehicle? If I feel threatened that's an acceptable use of force. If the carjacker already is in the vehicle driving off, that's a no go. I think we need to stop with the overly generalized hypotheticals here. This is also why you don't talk to the cops after, because it's NOT about stopping the theft of a vehicle, it's about defending your life.

That's why I mentioned it, I do the same staking when given the notch to do it. If not I use a dab of blue loctite. I have an SB Tactical pdw brace on an other that doesn't have a locking nut and transferred it to a longer one when the ATF changed their mind on OAL. I never used a thread locker on the buffer extension prior, and prefer not to unless there isn't a jam nut.

The wrench worked great, I didn't see any more damage than was already done. There was nothing applied to the threads that I could find.. no slipping, they are rounded with a proper diameter that when force is applied the rounded tab locks in place. After one strong pull and nothing moved I grabbed the breaker bar lol. But I will warn that blue loctite has given me some real issues getting a castle nut off, go light if you plan on using it.

Definitely get the specific tool for it. I buggered one up trying to use my armors wrench that really didn't have enough meat on the tab. For reference, once I bought the specific wrench, I still needed to stick a pipe on the end of it for leverage to break it free. Would love to meet the gorilla who put the damn thing on.

lol, that's nothing compared to the smell of cerakote baking... talk about being banned from the kitchen. I haven't painted a gun since 2019 because I need to find a new method other than the kitchen oven.

I'm referencing the last paragraph on pg 80. Which mentions objective licensing requirements are gtg. They carved out a bunch of foreseeable issues that you mentioned. However, you will be hard pressed to show qualifications with a specific handgun is unconstitutional when you add in the "publics interest", with the ability to qualify with any firearm you want, and as many you want. The state will paint it as a minor inconvenience in the interest of public safety, that doesn't actually prevent someone from carrying the firearm of their choosing. Furthermore, there is an unlikely chance such an issue even makes it to SCOTUS, unless someone plans on carrying a firearm they didn't qualify with and wants to be the test case. Thomas left a lot to be desired in the courts opinion. He was very broad in these statements which means they aren't too keen on ruling on them. I also see larger issues being more important with regards to the courts time.. we can't even get them to hear a mag ban case, a gun ban case, a bumpstock ban case... a lot of gun related issues were shot down this session.

I've only used their H series, which requires oven cure at 250f for a couple hours. Their C series is an air cure, but both require the same prep. Prepping the parts is the biggest hurdle tho, I degrease with an acetone dunk, flash in the oven to pull more oil out, degrease again, flash again and repeat until oil spots are gone. Then sand blast the part with aluminum oxide. Then apply paint. If you have a decent size air compressor, and space for a small Eastwood blasting cabinet, and vivosun grow tent you can vent outside, the cost of these items is less than paying someone for a rifle cerakote job. Learning curve isn't too bad, and any mistakes you just send the part back to blasting after a partial cure in the oven. If you want any paint to stick, and the rilfe has previously had oil on it, you really need to flash it in the oven. Solvents work good, but roll marks will still hold onto it in the corners of the crevices. It's taken me 3-4 flashes to get all the oil out of dust cover indents.

Edit, classes are up.

It's not a comp or brake so it's not concussive in any rearward pattern.

You guys using testors enamel? I used a toothpick to fill in some sights after blasting for cerakote and it's held up fantastically. Prep is key.

Throw a Daniel defense flash suppressor on that baby!

Not sure what you mean. They opinion states that NY State May continue to require licenses so long as they employ objective requirements. That leaves very little open to NJs licensing requirements as nothing is subjective; take and pass a qualifiying course, file paper work, don't be a prohibited person, petition references.. The only thing they left open is any subjective requirement, which could be dropping the requirement for references. But even still it's an objective process if 3 people are required to complete a very specific form. I belive the opinion even states the process examines your "moral character"... and they didn't opinion on that aspect of licensing

Do you want the appropriate reaction? Or the overreaction? This will be dependent on who answers the call, or which cop shows up.

Video is long, but informative.. 22lr isn't ideal but it will get the job done.

2 paragraphs from a 100+ page opinion doesn't even begin to summarize the issue. As with most opinions, the central issue is stated, followed by exceptions, cavets and limitations. Read page 80 of the published document. (It won't let me copy and paste is for some reason)

Well, the SCOTUS turned away the bumpstock Ban.... maybe this is why. Not that it would help NJ or Maryland.

My advice would be to sell it all separately, most people on here may not be willing to pay full retail for components, press etc if its a packaged deal. That's gonna be a lot of money. It's a sellers market, so it's a good time.. just gotta find someone willing to pay those prices.

Did you read the entire opinion? There is plenty in there that references states are allowed to permit the process.

If you can hit up to 15 yards, you don't need to hit the 25 yard shots to pass, correct?

I dont disagree with your sentiments, NJ is still a duty to retreat State . I'm sure some people will need an attitude adjustment. I wouldnt advise a shoulder carry for the reason specified, along with many other reasons why its a bad idea. I would only argue there are officials who do shoulder carry, and its listed in NJ admin code as acceptable for "off duty use". I was under the impression the specific NJ States HQC is a certification for police and armed security that was twice a year. We don't have to take that, but an iteration of it. That's what I meant.

I think the point being made is these places are "confirmed" by NJSP, so for people who don't want to wait they can utilize these. Anything else might prove problematic in the mean time.

Disband is a bit much, but it would stop them from rewriting the statutes however they like.

There are many different iterations of a HQC. Nothing in the law stipulates simulating real life encounters. This isn't for police officers etc. For the carry how you want comments, I don't need to check with a lawyer. The statute doesn't differentiate between open and conceal carry.... so you literally have the option for either. NJ doesn't have a conceal stipulation. I'm not sure how this leads to reckless endangerment unless you have an example to share.

They're not wrong, IMO. The qualifications are for accuracy and safety, not firearm handling proficiency. It's bad enough NJ is setting the bar so high, we don't need to proliferate that. Unless the law differentiates you carry how ever you want.