JackDaWack

They do but not always. Last month we had a lock-down drill that included the police, to test both the school and police response time. In the event of a "real" lock-down, the cops do the walk through, and school personnel are to lock themselves in any room. I asked my supervisor what to do if it was a real situation... he said if you can get out of the building why would u hang around?..this is coming from a former superintendent.

FYI- Thunder mountain in Ringwood is like an hour away from west orange. -Also, sounds like the pain is in the general area of your sinuses. Which could be from your glasses, the poweder, the percussion, amount of exposure to light.

Obama's probably gonna start the next civil war.... at least our side will have guns.

My first pistol was the new Beretta m9a1, i have zero regrets with that pistol. accurate, affordable, reliable, + looks great. It was a great first pistol, easy to clean and field strip, a caveman could do it. Cant go wrong with any of the fs 92's. The only deal breaker here would be if you didn't like the way it fits in your hand. I'm not a huge fan of the 90-two, but that's only because they make the prestigious 92. If your looking to holster this, i would just go with the regular 92 over the railed versions.

Hmmm... brush up on your politics, that's 101 level knowledge, and makes perfect sense. Conservatives- Small government, Power to the people, less regulation, free market. Like the way our country was founded upon. I'm not going to talk about liberals, i'll likely offend someone.

http://www.berrysmfg.com/product-i14653-c75-g8-b0-p0-VersaCradle.aspx This?

Was the break new? it looks like it was cut to remove the pin. Anyway, the fix looks great considering what he had to work with.

I use bore snakes, and their easier to use with the barrel attached(better grip). I also don't do a complete field strip every time i shoot, but i do clean the barrel with the snake(it's just too easy and simple not to). And yes, always from breach to muzzle. I probably should just take the barrel off, but i dont see any huge benefit in doing so.

I'm not sure direction matters with revolvers. With auto loaders you have to worry about what ever your pulling out of the barrel falling into the frame of the gun... no issue there with a revolver.

Are you looking for something specifically for rifles? Most if not all of them are plastic(polymer). They make a few metal ones. However, what is the purpose of it?

The AG guide line is to clear up any debate about what substantially identical means in the statute. I think its pretty clear in NJ what constitutes a AW. I think it's a load of crap at the same time. The only thing i find unclear is what happens when a new AG steps in. Her guide line is as good as law, they cleared out the IO rifles in the swift of a pen stroke.. But what happens when she's gone? If you know the law, and understand how the AG has defined a vague discrepancy, then there's no confusion about what the state will and will not allow. if you decide to come to your own conclusion about what "substantially identical" means, then you risk the state not agreeing with your terms. The thing is, if you know the AWB statute, then you should know the AG guideline. The problem is that no one knows either. I get the idea behind having it ALL in the statute, but NJ would easily argue they have a guideline for the vague discrepancy, and i guarantee all it would accomplish is adding the current guideline into the current statute. Are they fighting to get rid of the statute? or clarify these vague discrepancy's? I don't see how adding to it will help, because if the guideline were to disappear, one could argue a semi-auto is not substantially identical to a assault weapon in any terms. One could make any argument really, but you would have to prove it in court.

I'm not sure if this same argument would play out in NJ. First, our AWB laws are very strait forward. Gun is either on the list, or has features making it illegal... I can understand a wrongful prosecution suit, and i have no idea how Cali has its AWB laws written. I do agree, if the prosecution cant determine whether someone is breaking a law or not, something needs to change. Not knowing a law is different then knowing it and not understanding it.

They are required to verify employment, how exactly? is this really illegal? if all they are doing is verifying employment?

They(the anti's) always use ambiguous words to describe gun owners. The language they use, i find insulting, especially coming from professional journalist. They use words that are the most offensive to the general public to get their attention. They also use words like u stated, that refer to "ganster" terminology as a means to paint gun owners in a negative way. You can take a perfectly legit article and turn it into an anti statement just by playing with the language...

I believe we had a thread about this some months ago. The ATF clarified some points of interest... it seems that it is ok to turn a handgun into a rifle, and back into a pistol. However, it is illegal to turn a rifle into a pistol.

This. If it keeps them from calling your employer, is it really a big deal? It's one way for them to verify your employment. The only issue i see is if you don't receive pay stubs(direct deposit). I would black out everything except my name and address, and the employer info.

here's one i've never herd before. "Why do i carry a gun?, Because i cant carry a cop!" LMAO

Please santa!! i Will do anything!... well maybe not anything.

What exactly are they protesting? Sitting on a side walk, on a college campus, pretending to be part of OWS? This seems like the wrong place to be doing this, unless they were protesting against the college i dont get wtf they are doing... I also would take the argument they were creating a public saftey hazard by blocking a path, which could give them reason to use force. Excessive, yes. This whole movement is turning into a shitshow, one in which i understand in concept, but cant for the life of me understand what exactly the focus is. These people should be in the capital protesting.

Just to add to this, a Semi-Auto rifle/shotgun.

Beretta made one, but was expensive and seems to have disappeared from the market. They are made by other companies now.

First, Aiken was a double whammy, mags over the limit, and the moving exemption which permits the transportation of a handgun. Nothing was made up... and that judge has already been removed from his seat due to being a douche, another case might have possibly been a better example. The point is what is specifically noted in the statues, what A) constitutes a firearm and B)what constitutes a loaded firearm. NJ defines what a Firearm is, a magazine is no where in that definition. So hence cannot be interpreted as a firearm, if its loaded it is a loaded magazine not a loaded firearm. One can only interpret from the statutes that a firearm, as defined by nj law, must have ammunition located within to be considered loaded. Some states include this within its statues, A firearm is loaded if the firing chamber, magazine, clip or cylinder of the firearm contains a cartridge. That leaves interpretation open to the location of the mag, (in the gun or loose). In NJ they don't define loaded, so we can only interpret that cartridges must be in what NJ defines as a firearm.

I don't camp, i zone. mwhahaha! me and who ever im playing with picks a spot on the map to secure. I'd rather be killed by a camper 100 times then by 1 enemy that spawned right behind me. Either that or we clear the map in teams of 3's. If we have a full team we do counter rotations on the maps, creating a choke pattern. Since every map is circular in nature, camping in the MW3 can be difficult unless your playing against a bunch of noobs.

Target.22's are full size pistols, and they actually weigh more with bull barrels. My MKIII is bigger and heavier then my 92. The only real difference is grip angle, and aesthetics.

This is NJ not some other state. And the courts cannot make up stuff. A judge can interpret a law, but he can not just make something up that doesn't exist. NJ does not define a loaded mag as being a loaded firearm(the magazine is not part of the gun). The Magazine must be in the firearm. You need to read the NJ laws, stop reading crap out there on the internet. Cali, defines the magazine is part of the gun, hence if its loaded,the gun is loaded. that is written in their state law. NO SUCH LAW EXISTS IN NJ. The difference is when the magazine is defined as part of the gun, it opens up interpretation when its loaded. If no such definition exist, there is nothing to interpret.