JackDaWack

They (ATF), can measure it anyway they want. So if you give them the opportunity to measure it with a folded brace, they'll have the opportunity to chose folded or not.. Why give them that opportunity?

They do not need to meet that requirement. Per usual the state police created a condition based on specific situations that may or may not be present. It's safer to build your own other in NJ than an ar15 rifle based on the states reasoning. They are concerned people will have illegal firearms during the building process prior to completion. Which is in fact a concern. It's like building your own ar15, when you put an adjustable stock on its technically illegal until you pin it. Same with a threaded barrel. Yet, people have been doing this all over the state who are competent enough to do the compliance work themselves. Since an other doesn't fall under this category of assault rifles most of the evil features don't exist. The state thinks that because you have parts to make an assault rifle, it would be illegal to build one. But once it's built, if you follow the parameters, it's 100% legal just like a ar15 rifle. Have you built anything using the ar15 platform before?

I've been to 4 or 5 doctors in the area, and not once got a whiff of political bias one way or the other.

You're arguing for the same thing. A cash price and a CC price. Most places just add the fee as overhead and charge it across all sales. Regardless of how it is marketed, which is really just psychological... which ever price is standard and whether there is a discount or an up charge, the result is the same.

I have applied through two towns because of moving. Both had my permits in hand by or around 30 days. A lot of towns are good like that. I even got a sincere apology when I moved and it took 2 months for all the paper work to transfer from my old town. I have never had the option to personally get involved with these issues, in my 12 years I've never had a delay that wasn't reasonable. Knowing there are PDs that pull this crap irks the shit out of me. Cause it could have easily been me.

Do you know if unemployment and FML fall under the same category for taxes, in that FML qualifies for the $10,200 waiver? I have to do taxes in the next week and was going to search this out anyway.

Seems like a good time to present the argument again and carry it to a higher court if needed. The courts gave them immunity to delay permits indefinitely, and they have obviously taken advantage of the ruling beyond its purpose. Tons of examples where background checks were complete and PDs waited months to issues permits/ID'S. Get some ass on tape threatening to make it even longer and you have a prime civil suit.

Well they used to pull the "we haven't gotten the background check from the state yet, or the mental health check" now with FARS, we see thats done relatively quickly.. so what's the excuse now? For most people with no local files to even look into, they're basically saying it takes months to fill out a card smaller than a post it note.

I could be wrong but most of what you assume doesn't exist. The only files that make it into there systems are formal. Traffic stop interactions for example.... you can be the biggest dick to the cop and I don't believe there is the ability for them to record this, unless it's part of a bigger investigation. Same with being called to your house. There may be a file they were called there, but unless a formal investigation takes place.. there is no record of the interaction. I'd imagine the cops say they do all this shit make it look like they are actually doing something. And let's be real 99% of people have zero files at the local pd to even look at or investigate. I belive its the local DV files they are looking for. Which is a simple and quick process.

There shouldn't be "internal" files on things like that. They are welcome to search for complaints against a resident in relation to DV or any other criminal complaints. Which takes all of 10 seconds to type a person's name onto a computer. Either way, there is only one single file that would serve to disqualify and its a DV complaint or restraining order. Did someone tell you they investigate your driving record?

I feel like it's slow for me most mornings....

But are they swamped? Applications are digital these days, and the state does the background check. Permits are now digital. So what the fuck do these police departments do these days?

How much does that set you back a year?

Poor people already pay no taxes, so I have no idea what they're talking about.

Yup, dumbasses.. can't say your surprised when it's a major question asked upon filing. Wife went on FML, had taxes withheld. There is no reason it shouldn't be mandatory for the lowest tax rate, with the option to withhold more to CYA. You're an asshole if this comes as a surprise. It literally means you didn't read a damn thing you filled out when applying.

Like I said MOA is MOA. It's a standard of error at range. moa represents an error or area, circular in nature at distances between two points. A 1 moa dot will cover about 1inch at a distance of 100 yards. If you magnify your optic at 3x, you still have a 1moa dot. It's not a measurement of how big the reticle is. It's a measurement of how much the reticle covers at distance. If an eotech dot didn't change in size, it would technically decrease in MOA, which I believe is not optically possible. If you had a one inch target at distance, a 1moa dot would cover it. If you magnified the that 1inch target it will appear 3x bigger.. if the dot doesn't still cover it, it is no longer 1 moa it's actually much smaller. I have never seen an example of thst happening with a rds and magnifier. The video I posted above, you clearly see the reticle grow in size at the same proportion as the targets. Regardless of model, all eotech rds use the same technology. Only scopes with second focal plane reticles maintain their size at various magnifications. The fact Eotech publishes this "myth" on their website is another reason why I no longer own their optics.

Cheap is relative when I will literally shoot through an entire brick of .22lr in under a hour at the silhouette range. I'm basised as hell towards the 92fs, and the swap kit is affordable and reliable though I don't have one. I prefer a dedicated pistol like the Ruger MK target.

Where did you get this image from? It's literally superimposed with a fake dot. Watch the video and tell me it doesn't magnify

I've had issues trying to figure out their dating system before. Mine is from 67. If I followed their dating system like mine, it's from 1981. S 04 month 81 year xxv All I know is, my 67 wingmaster is butter smooth and I would take it over anything new off the shelf today. Paid 300 for it. I wouldnt hesitate to buy that one listed, and have it cerakoted or something.

Never heard of someone complain, so it must be good enough? RRA got a ton of shit years ago for something similar, I beleive theirs were loosening up.

I think it's was made in 98, using the S in the serial number.

Gotta go with what works for you. I know exactly what you mean. And it doesn't really ease up over time.

https://www.gunbroker.com/item/893863067 I would be bidding on this if I needed something. I actually already have one. Light years better than any shotgun listed here. Remmy 870 police. Don't be fooled by used ones, the older models or fantastic and much better then what has been produced in the last decade. Mine is over 50 years old, with updated magpul furniture.

A plate carrier drops over your head and velcros around the sides. I can get mine on in about 5 seconds without rushing and fumbling. To me, messing with a belt seems like more work. With practice I think the time to get either on is negligible. E

If it took the same time to put your belt on as a plate carrier, which would you chose?