Soju

Yes.

I'm not surprised. My mother was dead for a while due to a similar type error. But somehow she pulled through and clawed her way out of that grave after a few years.

You are correct. I was going to edit my post, but forgot about it. Though it is not treason, it gets very close to that line, by means of becoming an act that is akin to the start of levying a war against us. So in its own capacity, it is not. But when coupled with other acts...it could lead to one.

Spike's Tactical Mid-length with standard Spike's BCG. Cleaning varies, but I imagine I probably clean it more frequently than most. I clean all my firearms between all range sessions, and I don't think I've shot much more than maybe 300 rounds at a time through my AR.

I don't reload. Ammo is expensive. I have not had a single issue with steel cased ammo. I have not had a single issue with brass cased ammo. Steel cased ammo is cheaper. Ergo, I generally shoot steel cased ammo.

So he claimed it was out of fear for the children's safety, yet So what was the cop doing in the 5-minutes the father wasn't with the kids? Just hanging out? If he really was concerned, he wouldn't have just waited around for 5-minutes, let the guy get back in the car, and then shot him. Nothing in that version of the story, nor the previous version of the story, show any amount of rational decision making on the cops part.

What an incredible amount of maturity... I am amazed to see that when it comes to second amendment issues, being gun owners, people are very strong to defend it, and point out all the discrepancies related to it. Yet when the issue is another amendment, but where it effects others and not them, because they are the popular opinion, you get the polar opposite response, and it is handled by telling people to piss off. It is responses like these why we have gun control and other infringements on our rights in this country. Very disappointing.

I don't believe in god, but personally, I don't care much that the phrase is in there. It doesn't bother me. However, if someone else does care, that is okay, and understandable. This is not the first time people have tried to get it removed. The phrase should have never been added to begin with. If they make the kids say this pledge, then if people don't want the "under god" part, then it should be removed. Otherwise, the entire pledge should either be optional, or not spoken at all.

That is moot. If one wishes people to be disarmed and unarmed someplace, it would reason that their opinion would not be different just because they are someplace else. It would only matter if he supported self defense and based on his location was NOT able to use a firearm to do so. That is not the case however.

He wrote a dissenting opinion on both D.C v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago. http://www.law.corne...07-290.ZD1.html

It is in fact. Unfortunately because they have the power, they will claim those that dissent them are the ones who are treasonous. The truth doesn't matter. Straight from the US Constitution

Well considering his own written opinion on self defense says that self defense is not a right, and has never been fundamentally such, I don't feel bad in the least. Maybe it is bad of me to say this, but it actually wouldn't have been a terrible thing if he was injured. Though I wish no ill will on anybody in particular, I have no pity on those who willingly chose to be defenseless.

You CANNOT legislate STUPIDITY!

I thought maybe there was a mandatory nap required before crossing, or maybe he is just the slowest moving human on the planet?

One can only hope that it doesn't come down to a ban on firearms. That is the worst thing that could happen. If it does, I feel that many people's hands will be forced. When you have no other option, what is left? As the saying goes, "freedom isn't free". Lots of Freedom Rifles (I like the term, as coined above) will be tested and the real cost of freedom will be seen. Fortunately for those who stand for freedom, many tyrants are cowards.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFuGBKcyEQw&feature=related This was from Jesse Ventura's show, an episode on 2012 doomsday, where a guy had an old missile silo he was going to transform into an underground condominium for doomsday. Thought it was related to what you guys were talking about.

It's easy to defend NJ when you live in PA!

6000 people die every day in the US. Yes, many of them are tragic. But I fail to see why her death is so important, particularly if it was indeed drug related, as suspected.

People are too sensitive today. I call it the pussification of America. You can't spank your kid. You can't yell at them. You can't shoot their computer and post it online. I mean, what can you do to discipline your children? There is a reason there is a disproportionately large amount of Americans and young Americans that lack respect these days.

People are too sensitive today. I call it the pussification of America. You can't spank your kid. You can't yell at them. You can't shoot their computer and post it online. I mean, what can you do to discipline your children? There is a reason there is a disproportionately large lack of respect from Americans and young Americans these days.

I didn't forget to add anything. I said I was referring to police, so why would I have to say that again? Why did you have to say it again here? You said I never mentioned anything but police, and I quoted where that wasn't quite true, albeit indirectly so. And I certainly didn't leave out the common criminal, when they have no applicability to my point. I was talking about ACCOUNTABILITY, not a comparison of crimes committed. Here, to clear this up... Police, lawmakers, politicians, government, and large corporations/bankers who lobby for and contribute to said people, get away with increasingly more crimes because there is little accountability for them. I realize my vagueness may have caused some confusion, but I hope it is clear now.

How is me pointing out that police departments already have approval to fly drones when you said that would never happen not relevant to drones?????????? How is me showing other examples of what could be considered something with high liability, that happens, when you gave that as a reason not relevant???? I was responding to what you said directly, but that is not relevant?

Really now? You even quoted it... "So if those who have the power, have the authority, and have the guns" Who would you figure I am referring to with having power and authority? I guess I wasn't explicitly clear. But I digress. Even if I had not, what difference would it make to my point?

Steps #2, 3, and 5. Got it.