Soju

I'm not a glock guy, so I am assuming the Glock 27 is either a .40 or .45 and not a 9mm correct? If so, and the report is true, that is hilarious! With that said, he is a moron for admitting to breaking the law. Had he kept his mouth shut, he could use FOPA. Unfortunately he told them otherwise, and it no longer applies. Idiotic. That is why, as a rule, you don't say anything to police, ever. Sucks for him.

Not exactly. I mean, you are right, in the sense that is how it is suppose to work. However we live in a police state within a police state (NJ in the US) so there is a real possibility that you could be charged with a crime you did not commit. Because the prosecutor represents the state, and the judge works for the state, you have everything going AGAINST you, and though legally, the burden of proof is on the prosecution, it actually works the other way. You will have to prove your innocents. Messed up isn't it?

Your wife MADE you watch it? Your wife sounds like the man! (not in a disrespectful way, but a badass awesome type way!) Every real man has seen The Expendables, at least twice.

You are insane! It is definitely a must watch! Anybody who thinks otherwise is well, I don't think there are words to describe it. Just like a don't think there are words that can describe my excitement for a second Expendables movie. The Expendables 2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Obviously there are issues going on here, but I am thinking the issues are more with whoever was raising him. Unless he stole the car, the beer, and/or shotgun, then he got access of them from somebody. People do stupid things and make mistakes when they are drunk, do you really think a 14-year old is going to being making sound decisions when intoxicated? The fact that he may end up in a LOT of trouble over this has the potential to be an awful result.... At 14 you could be less than a year from driving, minors can legally own long guns (just not purchase), and somebody has real problems, but it is hard to say that the 14-year old is the one. He very well may, but whoever is giving him alcohol and letting him drive is likely the one with more problems. People drink for different reasons. Drinking to the point of blacking out, is almost always stupid. But drinking till you are more than buzzed, but not yet hammered, well that is fun. Agreed!

As I understand he was talking about the sub-compact. I am about as skinny as they come, and conceal a m&p compact IWB or OWB without much issue, so the XDm subcomact would be similar I assume. Certainly a slimmer pistol (ie. single stack) will be easier, but that isn't to say a double stack would be an issue. That is all I was trying to get at. Sorry if it sounded argumentative, wasn't my intention!

Yes, if interesting is a synonym for expensive as fuhh, then yes, it is interesting.

Saying a double stack pistol is going to be "no better" for a carry option is quite ignorant. I am not sure where you got the idea a double stack pistol isn't good for carrying. That is ridiculous. The grip and slide length are more of a factor than width. I would never suggest someone not use a certain firearm because of this.

Good luck. Most police officers don't bother with following the law when there are no repercussions for them them, especially when they can hide behind their departments "policy".

One of my favorite movies. Now it is fixed.

It varies between them all being 'safe queens' or almost none of them. It just depends on if I am shooting them or not! But seriously, I don't have any specific firearm that doesn't get shot. Some may get shot more, but none just sit there. Maybe if I had more.

I know you weren't talking to me, but anyways...everybody should post pictures. Of course a number of pics I'm not going to post...

Though I have the Crossbreed Supertuck, I generally carry in an OWB minimalist type leather holster. I find it easier, more comfortable, and just as concealable in many situations. The IWB only comes out on certain situations...

Air Force '07-Present Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst I've been to over 100 different places, in 37 countries and 38 states, and 2 other US territories spending well over 500 days in the past 3 2/3 years somewhere other than NJ. For my mode of transportation... In Iraq And just for fun some more of my photos Western Afghanistan Guam Undisclosed location in Columbia

Spreadsheet detailed by firearm, caliber, and ammunition, keeping track of rounds fired and remaining, both specifically, per caliber, and overall.

I like them.

After doing some reading (on an unrelated matter), I came across something, and immediately thought of the issues being dealt with in a lot of these threads. Part of the issue being raised is that police are not following the law, and their defense is they are following 'The Guide', which is their policy. Most of these threads in the legal section we talk about NJ and Federal Law, and how it effects us. The problem is that it often doesn't matter, because of different, often contradictory, policy or protocol. The above quotes are from a 15 page letter Tom Ball wrote prior to lighting himself on fire in front of the Cheshire County Court house in NH earlier this year. Puts things in perspective I think.

I'm with the majority here. Mine is the same as the 2 photos above.

Almost anything you send is appreciated. I was fortunate that I didn't spend my deployments directly in Afghanistan, but we did fly there daily and always brought cases of milk...real milk. Most places out there only have that crappy fake powdered milk. I know this doesn't help you guys in your care package though!

People can imply things that are, or are not said all sorts of ways. It doesn't necessarily mean these implications are correct. I refer you to the following video as an example.

Strictly legally speaking, the above posters are correct. It isn't exactly an inheritance, per NJ law. So it isn't his firearm. Is he okay to take it to the range? With his mother he is, yes. Without her, legally, he is not. Could he do so and be fine? Yes, the odds are in his favor, and by a fairly large margin. I will caveat that by saying I am not suggesting he do anything illegal. Just answering the question

True. Of course if it happened nothing like what the article said, it would render most of the posts irrelevant. I don't think anybody is suggesting that it would still apply otherwise. Even if it did happen differently, are opinions would still hold in a hypothetical scenario that this initial story provides.

I right on the border of "Farms and Army Bases" and "Happy white families". Cool! Pretty accurate in general haha.

I think there are some squirrels and other small critters and varmint that might disagree! For a pocket gun, with not much of a barrel, it might not make much a difference, but who knows, (I'm sure somebody!), but not this guy. [by "this guy" I mean me. Just wanted to clarify]

I've only ever seen my father tear up twice. That was on of the times. Got to love your parents.