DAHL

Yes but the question is; does the state have the right to request those PI hearings? If they do the process extends on. After the TRO there is probably a hearing for a permanent injunction, then it goes to trial. Bottom line is that we are not free and clear just yet. I believe the state is looking to bring this case before an activist left wing judge who will reject the PI.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.njd.506033/gov.uscourts.njd.506033.46.0.pdf I don't know what this all means but can guess that it presents a request by the state for a long drawn out delay process. It seems to have to do with a preliminary injunction.. The way I read it the state wants to keep things going until they get in front of an activist left wing judge. Any legal minds reading this?

IMO, its difficult to say how much of the cancel carry bill will be struck down on a TRO and what items will be retained or kept. Even if we get a TRO on all of the worse parts of the law, there will still be a trial at the third circuit court of appeals to determine the final outcome. TRO means temporary restraining order. To receive a permanent injunction; this brings with it more legal challenges and it is likely that far left NJ will continue to press to deny our second amendment rights until the very end. I am optimistic for a good legal ruling by judge Bumb this Thursday but even so this is not the end of the fight to keep our second amendment rights..

Yes I will agree that a hearing will take place in the next few weeks. What I love about this is that the tyrants in the state will need to defend a law that denies vetted, and trained peaceful citizens from exercising their 2nd amendment rights. Point is the state has no defense. They are just there to try and force their prejudiced perverted socialist belief system on you and me. ALL other states respect the right to keep and bear arms. NY and NJ are the only holdouts but........ in the end they will LOSE..

I don't believe that a court date has been set for judge Bumb to rule on the combined cases of Koons vs Reynolds and Siegel vs Platkin but I'll guess that it will later this month. Did anyone see a date?

The mistake that many made was about Judge Karen Williams. She is a Biden appointee but has proven to be a moderate, fair and even handed jurist. Whatever way the case went the result would have been the same. We read that the Murphy administration would have preferred Judge Williams thinking that she could legislate from the bench on the carry ban but she stuck with strict constitutional principles and applied them fairly. Judge Williams has earned my respect and its a sure thing that the left is not very happy with her today. .

Numerous pistols have a front forearm. Trouble is that this pistol feature is illegal in NJ. Just take a look at the AR and AK pistols.

If arm braces are banned and you remove them it turns your weapon into a pistol that would be illegal in NJ.

Parking lots used by courts, and municipal buildings are state/town property. Post Offices are considered federal property and IMO all would be off limits to CCW. I believe that all parking lots associated with any prohibited carry location would fall under the same classification. If you must go to one of these places buy a steel car pistol safe bolt it in the trunk, park on the street and walk to the location but we will need clarification on the legality of storage of your pistol in ones unattended vehicle. BTW, firearms are prohibited in some National Parks like Grand Canyon. It goes by the state laws where the park is located

The good news coming off yesterday was that the Sielgel vs Platkin and the Koons vs Reynolds cases were combined and will be sent back to judge Bumb. The complaints of the entire case are now up for review by judge Bumb and it is unknown what parts will fall under the TRO and what parts will not. For instance the part of the law that takes the issuing authority away from the courts could stand but all of the higher fees and the other parts of the law that require registration of all firearms may also be maintained. The state has yet to make its move but I would not rule out an appeal to the third circuit court to rescind the TRO.

I sure hope that you are correct about this good news.

Exactly as expected .Now I expect Judge Williams can and will rescind the TRO that was issued on the Koons case. Then we go to the 3rd circuit court of appeals. Murphy is already out there bragging how they are keeping guns out of sensitive places for us but not for him.

Todays hearing will be held in front of Judge Karen Williams that is a Biden appointee. Needless to say I am not optimistic that a far left Democrat is going to stay the TRO decision. IMO, the cases will be combined and the law will stand for now and be brought before the third circuit court of appeals for a final decision on this egregious Unconstitutional law. I hope that I am wrong about this.

AFAIK no CCW holder nationwide was ever allowed to carry in a Federal building, Courthouse or a National Park. Koons vs Reynolds had to do with the NJ state government deciding that ALL Private property is a sensitive location. This was clearly wrong and hence the TRO was issued. Some sensitive locations are still in effect and I encourage everyone to understand where they are. You carry there and you are a felon. The full extent of the cancel carry bill has yet to be decided. I believe that more of this egregious cancel carry law will be found unconstitutional and I believe that it will be brought to the 3rd circuit court of appeals to decide on its legitimacy.

Beware! You will never be able to legally carry on government or state owned property. Those are still judged to be "sensitive places. The TRO covers carry but only on most private property. You still cannot carry in Casinos, Pot Shops, Healthcare facilities, Schools, parks, Sporting events and all government buildings. Read the ruling.

We can only hope that the TRO is issued in Koons Vs Reynolds soon. On the request for a TRO on the Siegel vs Platkin case it is to be heard on Monday by judge Karen Williams a Biden appointee. The chances of seeing any relief there are IMO slim.

We have some pretty reliable information from a major gun rights activist that says that Murphy had a conference call last week with all the major insurance companies who write in NJ and instructed them to NOT issue liability insurance to CC holders. Here the legislature passes a law that mandates CC liability insurance while on the other hand Murphy makes it illegal to buy it. Murphy is doing everything possible to see to it that his far left administration goes against the constitutional and the Bill of Rights. Hopefully this matter will be brought before the court of appeals.

The fight is on and some very committed 2A organizations have filed lawsuits on the cancel carry bill. The NRA/ANJRPC, GOA and FPC are already in it. I would not compare the NJ fight for our rights to any other state. The third circuit court of appeals where it will end up for the short term is not a far left court. The 2nd circuit out of New York City is but what can people expect? The best scenario would be if the supreme count stepped in early next year. We shall see where its goes but the Bruen decision is clearly on our side. .

As of today, The NRA/ ANJRPC, GOA, and FPC all have issued lawsuits challenging the unconstitutionality of the cancel carry bill. Something is being done to restore of rights and I expect court decision will be forthcoming in the next few weeks. If you have not supported any or all of these organizations, I suggest that you do so. I have contributed to all. As for the NJ Second Amendment society; they seem to have faded from the picture. While well meaning it was largely a one or two man show and it looks like they have given up the fight perhaps for a shortage of resources..

These uninformed woman probably never bothered to read the bill or become familiar with what it takes to get a NJ concealed carry permit. The bill makes EVERYPLACE a sensitive place. You can't even carry in your own car. Is a gas station a sensitive place? This group is just a bunch of hard left anti-gun fanatics that have no logical arguments to support their position.

But before you do this, please wait for the courts to overrule the blatant unconstitutionality of the cancel carry bill.

New Zealand is on a slippery slope towards full scale Communism. It is no longer a free country. The government tells you how you should think, how you should feel and what you should believe in, the same exact rules used in Red China.

Yes the Democrats will vote how they are told to vote by Czar Murphy. Even if the email and contact campaigns fail; its purpose is to show the despots that there are many peaceful law abiding gun owners in their districts that could swing a tight election. The number of gun owners in NJ has doubled in the past two years. That could mean two million votes;, a sizable number that cannot be ignored come election time.

Do your part. Write all the senators and email and let them know that you expect them to vote no as to the gross unconstitutionally of S3214. Be polite but hit all the senate addresses listed here. https://www.anjrpc.org/page/MONDAYCarryKillerBillMovesToFullSenate email address page: https://www.anjrpc.org/page/NJSenate

We all know the road that we are going down. The cancel carry bill will pass but public testimony, speaking out for what is right, and writing your legislators will raise public awareness about the kind of despots that we have in Trenton. We can say that the big cities control the NJ vote but what about the soccer moms that always vote democrat? We also need to get the message out to our black citizens that NJ government is NOT your friend. The cancel carry bill is a racist bill. Look at the crime in the inner cities. Has it gotten better under democrat control.? These are good talking points that must be discussed and hammered home.. Your opinion counts. Use it.