Everything posted by diamondd817
-
debating between G26 or G27
Not at all. Just making people aware that the M&P C models are compacts and not sub compacts. It cost me time, money, and a P2P to figure this out. My loss is your gain.
-
debating between G26 or G27
Nope. Closer in size to the 19/23. I owned all 3 at once, 19, 26, 40c. The trigger guard on the S&W gives the illusion of a shorter grip by only letting you put 2 fingers on it. If you measure from the top of the slide to the bottom of the grip (with flat base plates) you will see just what im talking about. The S&W 40c/9c is heavier than the 19/23 pistol and holds less rounds. So I see no advantage to the S&W, hence the reason I sold off the S&W 40c. Here is an easier way to compare sizes. Put both the 23/40c slide down, grip up, on a piece of 1"x3" wood (so the sights don't touch any surface), take a picture of the grip heights and post it.
-
Resistance to FID application
In NJ? What a surprise!
-
Lt. Josey gets his job back
"With back pay"? You mean he wasn't "fired with pay" to begin with?
-
debating between G26 or G27
Why? They are compacts, not sub compacts. They are almost as big as the Glock 19/23, heavier than the 19/23, and hold less rounds than the 19/23's. The Glock 26/27 are a class all there own. Glock 26 all the way. My favorite pistol hands down.
-
Local Editorial & Response
Excellent write up sir. FYI. From what I can count, there are 44 States that are "Shall Issue" and/or "Constitutional Carry" . Sounds better that there are only 6 States than 10 States that infringe on your rights.
-
"Mental health" bill, now law. Clarification?
Well, you didn't actually think they were going to pass something that would affect criminals, did you?
-
Pantano vs NJ or CCW is coming... sorta maybe not quite
Looking at the history of the speed of the NJ Supreme Court on hearing cases, I am willing to bet it will be no less than 1yr from now, maybe as much as 2yrs.
-
Article: Rise of the Warrior Cop
Really? This is a joke, right? Is this a satire? Nobody agrees that this is excessive and a waste of resources and taxpayer money? Maybe some SOP's need to be re-evaluated. Quote: "nobody needs 10 bullets to kill a deeeaaar" - Gov Cuomo, NY Safe Act 2013 -
-
Article: Rise of the Warrior Cop
I feel the police have switched from public servants to government servants. The new slogan should be "To Protect and Serve the Interest of the Government".
-
Crazy censorship
What if you text "Barry"?
- 3 guns
-
our turn to riot?
I was wondering what ever happened to this case the other day. 14yrs? That's it!! That is bullshit. You get that much for a 16rd magazine in NJ. POS should get life without parole.
-
Gun used to shoot at police in Hackensack traced to Fl.
There are federal laws on the books to prevent this. I think its referred to as "straw purchase", oh wait, that only applies to law abiding citizens, not gang members.
-
Poll Results: Stand your Ground Laws
What these people don't understand is that "stand your ground" laws are for their benefit.
-
What are the "must have" guns for any collection?
Function is the exact same. However, the M9 gives you a straight dust cover which is much more appealing (opinion), and you get to have US stamped on your slide. Google Beretta straight dust cover vs slanted dust cover.
-
What are the "must have" guns for any collection?
Straight dust cover. Actual duty weapon of the military. US stamped on the slide.
-
SAF v NJ (MULLER et al v. MAENZA et al)
Assualt weapons and mag limits were the current issues when scalia did that interview.
-
SAF v NJ (MULLER et al v. MAENZA et al)
And just what if scotus rules in favor of justifiable need? Then what? Opens up a whole new can of worms.
-
What are the "must have" guns for any collection?
Glock 19
-
What are the "must have" guns for any collection?
Glock 19 Glock 22 Beretta M9 Colt 1911 S&W 686 S&W 642 Remington 870 Remington 700 Colt AR15 Ruger 10/22 Springfield M1A
-
SAF v NJ (MULLER et al v. MAENZA et al)
No. Scalia said "gun control" will eventually make it to the high court. He said nothing about carry cases.
-
SAF v NJ (MULLER et al v. MAENZA et al)
CA2 and CA4 ruled the same way as our CA3 did on justifiable need. Scotus already denied to hear NY's CA2 case. One judges dissent will not make a difference, especially when its not the majority opinion. I don't see this making it to the supreme court. And what if it does and scotus rules in favor of justifiable need?
-
SAF v NJ (MULLER et al v. MAENZA et al)
That means there is a 75% chance they will not hear it! The CA7 decision was based on a complete ban on carry. NJ doesn't ban carry, they just don't let average citizens get a permit. Big difference.
-
SAF v NJ (MULLER et al v. MAENZA et al)
NO.