SJG

What's a good dash cam at a good price to buy for front and back. Very confusing

Bottom line, it is likely Trump is done, one way or another. Those who believe the Supreme Court is going to save us will probably be dead by the time that happens. If the Senate goes Dem it is game over.

CCW account manager advises that they have not yet been served with a complaint by the NJ AG. Apparently, the AG's office is trying to get compliance by threats to sue which is having a chilling effect in the industry.

CCW SAFE which is a contract based as opposed to insurance based form of coverage is no longer writing for the State of N.J.(unless you are active law enforcement) because of Murphy's claim of "murder insurance". Apparently, they are refunding the full years premium to N.J. contract holders with no advanced notice of cancellation of the contract. If you are in this boat, I would suggest that you not cash the refunded premium check before you see if you can secure coverage elsewhere. At this time, I have no clue if there is even any "elsewhere" as I assume that other plans that have not already cancelled may leave the NJ market. It is not likely that a contract based plan can properly cancel before the term expires. I have not checked out if a plan that is insurance based is required to give advanced notice of cancellation. However, neither a contract based plan nor an insurance based plan would be required to renew at the end of the covered period anyway. You can secure coverage with CCW safe if you have residence outside of N.J. and you would be good to go in 49 States, but not here. Most of the other plans, were, IMO shit, because they do not cover the cost of experts, which can be the most expensive part of any litigation. I have no clue if any person has filed suit against the State of N.J. and/or a contract based or insurance based plan for cancellation. However, unless and until a court hears and decides some of these issues, this is just another problem to deal with. It is also possible that our AG is going after contract or insurance based plans.

you won't see this in N.J.

So what gas system would be the best on a 12. 5 556 other build?

All things being equal will the recoil impulse be greater with a carbine length or mid-length gas system? How do these compare for different length barrels?

If you run the Honey ADD-On to your Browser on your checkout cart this weekend it might hit a $30 off coupon code. It worked for me

Once the S. Ct. of Conn determined that the case could go forward and the U.S. Supreme Ct refused to grant cert that automatically establishes that a valid cause of action sufficient to justify further proceedings exists and under those circumstances legal fees cannot be recovered even if the plaintiffs are unsuccessful at trial.

1. Nothing. But not having it thrown out on motion or getting to the jury verdict stage is a different matter 2. How would you know that you got a Real Impossible Burger and not a fake https://nypost.com/2019/06/08/brooklyn-burger-king-caught-replacing-meatless-impossible-whoppers-with-beef/. And if you got a fake and did not find out and thought it did not taste like real meat, I guess you would loose the case. Although you might have another one for fraud

They absolutely cannot go after them for legal fees even if they win

No they can still be sued but must raise the immunity as a defense and see where that goes There is no basis for a defamation suit

It has no legal precedential value but practical ramifications for the industry

Yes

WTF do you think you are Mr. Rude, I don't have to account to you how I spend my time and what I choose to comment on.

When it comes to firearms, your past can haunt you. It is still a good idea if you qualify to get a record of conviction expunged for other reasons.

Unsealing is part of the statute where the underlying offense is relevant to litigation in connection with the permit process or where you seek employment in law enforcement.

For those of you who have played lawyer, you are wrong on the law, wrong on the effect of an expungement and wrong on what led the court to reach the decision it did. You may be interested to know that this case was handled by Nappen. Additonally, the evidence that Nappen and his client put forth left a lot to be desired.

Liberty is a reputable manufacture at a good price point and offers many sizes and styles. You can't go wrong with a Liberty.

Most of these at this price point are garbage unless you are looking for gun cabinet quality. The metal is very thin and they offer very little real security protection. Many of these can also easily be opened or defeated. They usually offer no fire protection, have no or garbage warranties which requires you to pay the cost of shipping back and offer no onsite service if you run into a problem. They are usually made in China. Of course, they are better than nothing.

What size are you looking for and what is your budget?

There are still numerous hurdles the plaintiffs will have to overcome before this case is even submitted to a jury. Most likely they will need evidence that can convince a jury that shooter saw the advertisements and relied on them in connection with the AR purchase and that the marketing practices were a substantial factor in the shooting injury and deaths at issue. They don't prove their case just because of the alleged advertisement and that their product was used in the shooting. Just how the plaintffs are going to prove that Remington marketed the weapon “as a highly lethal weapon designed for purposes that are illegal — namely, killing other human beings-also remains to be seen. All firearms are highly lethal --but proving that they were designed for illegal purposes is another kettle of fish. The downside here is that this is a mass shooting with huge dollar exposure in a anti-gun environment and will cost Remington and its carriers millions in defense legal fees moving forward. It will also encourage others to bring similar claims. This would not be a good time to invest in gun stocks.

It's all over the news. Remington has to either face the music at trial or try and settle the case. If the case proceeds to trial and they loose they can appeal-but the case is in the State Court System--that is not good. They would have to exhaust their appeals in the State System and then try SCOTUS on the pre-emption issue. SCOTUS probably hopes this case will go away by a settlement or failure at trial. The case will continue to have a chilling effect on the entire industry in the meantime. Also, the cost of doing business in the industry will probably increase as insurance carriers will face greater exposure and pass that along to manufacturers in the form of increased insurance premiums.

Completely different question then that originally asked of me. Depends on how the power is written.