Old Glock guy

Same here.

Show up at the rally! It may not be the ultimate answer, but if we can show up with a few thousand people, it would be a damn good start.

Here are a few of my favorites: 1) "I'm not against the Second Amendment, but no one needs to own an assault weapon." Do these people have any clue what an assault weapon is? They assume it's an AR15, because Piers Morgan and others tell them so. 2) "No one should need more than ten bullets to kill a deer." (Heard Cuomo say this again just yesterday.) Who says it's about hunting? What if you just enjoy shooting and don't want to have to keep reloading your mag? Or worse, what if you're being attacked by multiple adversaries? 3) "When the Constitution was written, they were using muskets." Yes, and so were the bad guys. I would hate to be defending myself with a musket against a BG, or worse, several of them with modern semiautomatic weapons.

I'm glad they're not talking about Clue. I'm sure they would want to take the gun away.

I totally agree with you. You don't have a chance with her.

Well done Wombat.

That is indeed well written. It draws the important distinction between a pure democracy and a constitutional republic. Our Constitution was designed to protect the rights of ALL people, but apparently our legislators believe it's only relevant when they find it convenient. Funny that they are all eager to defend the First Amendment (and rightly so), but they view the Second as disposable.

Holy crap! The libs get a little taste of blood and they go wild. I would defy any of them to explain how these new laws will prevent future tragedies.

Good one Mark! Was looking forward to the game all day, but it was over by the time I got home, sometime late in the first quarter.

Nice find Iggy! We need to get information like that out into the mainstream media (let that might ever happen!).

Just signed up and took the day off from work. Can we organize some kind of NJGF meet-up down there?

This is dead on! Why don't more people see it that way? Part of it is that the media have many people convinced that taking guns away from law-abiding citizens is a logical solution to a few criminals and maniacs slaughtering innocents.

I'm impressed that she actually read the letter, and didn't just hit "delete," like she does with the rest of ours.

No need to change the Constitution. Michelle will run in 2016. And she will get elected. You heard it here first.

Hey, nice video.

Wonder what they are going to do to ensure that the bad guys their citizens are defending themselves against don't have semi-auto firearms?

So since a few psychopaths use firearms to slaughter innocent people, our legislators decide it's a good idea to take guns away from tens of million law abiding citizens, who by defiinition are the most carefully vetted members of society, as we've all been through criminal background and mental health checks. By those standards, since a few drivers get drunk and kill people with their cars, we should consider banning cars. Or maybe we should ban alcohol. Oh wait, that's been tried before, and from what I've heard, it didn't work out real well.

I was there on Wednesday at around 4:00, and all the ports were full; but one opened up just as I walked up to the desk, so I did not have to wait at all.

http://www.newsmax.c...mo_code=1161A-1 That's probably just going to make Dianne Feinsten want to ban hammers and clubs after she gets through with her attack on so-called "Assault Weapons." BTW, has everyone written to their representatives in Congress? I had been procrastinating, and just took care of it. It's imperative that all the rest of you do the same.

Nice reference Ant. Yes, it looks like we are in for the 2A fight of our lives in 2013. We damn well are going to need to band together if we are going to prevail.

All the evidence is against the effectiveness of gun bans. Yet, our liberal legislators forge ahead with their anti-gun agendas, using every tragedy as a wedge for their advances. In many ways, it's about destroying self-reliance and making us more dependent on government.

Great article! Thanks for posting it.

Let me see if I understand the logic on this. 1) A horrible tragedy occurs when a crazed maniac steals some guns and goes on a rampage, killing a bunch of people, including 20 school children. 2) There is a rightful public outcry, with which most everyone agrees, that we need to do what we can to prevent such tragedies in the future. 3) The liberal politicians, backed by the eager mainstream media, decide to enact a sweeping new assault weapons ban, which does nothing to address the problem, but proposes to remove firearms from law abiding citizens across America. To me, that is a horrible, unjust disconnect. I mean, WTF!!!

Is there any rhyme or reason to all that, or is it just an arbitrary wish list of things she would like to see banned?

Sounds like it was a fun Christmas at IP and IPW's house!