Underdog

I guess I blew it when I passed up on one.

As far as colletivism goes, yeah, the only thing it lacked was sympathy for the big bad wolf who had a tough puppyhood and couldn't possibly be responsible for his predator-like actions.

I believe that they are not as reliable as their 9mm counterparts.

I believe that this is anti-gun. The face of the child shows it all. It is bringing to the attention, the American focus on firearms with the "New American Classic", etc., while largely glossing over the threat of the big bad wolf. It relishes in the necessity for the wussification of the American culture.

Weinberg is a progressive, statist menace who is supported in part by the Leftists on this forum, well, they will never stop their collective schumer from flying in our direction. Instead of working on laws that would actually increase the safety of the citizens, control of law-abiding citizens (and putting them at greater risk) is the real agenda. Thanks, Bergen County, for putting Lautenberg's Mommy in power.

They will probably have tracking devices in them as well as a means to disable them remotely.

The Blur is an awesome folder. And the Ka-Bar Becker BK14 is an awesome Necker.

Strap Diehard car batteries to their backs.

Time to pass a law that all politicians have to wear smart shock collars.

Never tire, not when the media is hijacked by radicals and supports a largely rogue government. I just want to be left alone, mostly, to take care of my family, and these statists won't do it. Is this country perfect? No! But the Constitution puts forth principle and I would rather be moving toward more freedom than tyranny. The source of information one uses can have a brain-washing effect if you aren't being critical.

Some might feel that anyone that voted for Obama the candidate or Obama the POtuS is a dumb a$$. The writing was on the wall. We are all suckers. The reason that Obama got a second term is that he is ushering forth a planned agenda and a majority of discouraged Americans finally realized that none of the chosen politicians, chosen by the established ruling class have any of our best interests at heart. So it might as well be the Czar-in-Chief, so we can see a little quicker what's in store for America, and to ensure without a shadow of doubt that this in fact the worst leadership this country has ever had. Destroy the economy and the dollar and any semblence of a Democratic Republic. Demonstate the corruption, greed, etc. Of these petty and pathetic leaders. Demoralize a godless people, domestic dogs to be fed, caged, neutured and led on a leash at will. Spend away the future and freedom, it doesn't even matter what you spend it on or what scandal as long as the current economy and government collapses. The people will be begging for any relief and willgo along with whatever when the shoe finally drops, and the statists are getting frustrated as their time-table is lagging behind. The question is how does a survivor adapt to this in post-USA?

I'm not going to defend good ole Bush, another Statist, but, again, the media made all the plays and ran the interference. He was crucified for everything he did just as Obama, a much more imperial president, well, he gets away with everything he does. Why? Because the elite in the two parties are working together and playing the American people. This is just another example of good cop/bad cop in Washington as we usher forth our agenda. Bush was made to be a bad guy, and it was OK with both parties. Obama was put into power by both the Republicans and Democrats... the Washington Elite, the Demopublicans, or Republicrats, they control the media and it is apparent that they play both sides and use distraction after distraction and a fawned poliarization to get the largely obscured true goal advanced as they use their showmanship to dazzle the sheeple. The ends justify the means and things are never what they seem.

Fantastic campaign? He wasn't challenged in the least. He was thrown a soft ball everywhere he went. He never had to explain any of his unsavory friends, fundamental change thoughts, etc.. The media was in the tank for him and that POS McCain purposefully threw the election. Now, if you want to say the main-stream media ran a fantastic propaganda campaign, I will agree with you.

This has nothing to do with whose right or whose wrong. It's not a pissing contest. It's about being informed and then acting, maybe making some sacrifices like others before, and working peacefully against this engine of "fundamental transformation" to attempt to preserve this nation and the belief in freedom, especially from a tyranical governing body. This isn't about puffing up chests and being holier than thou! My pet peeve is people not looking at the big picture, or realizing what is at stake. Is a site like Canada Free Press or the Blaze always right? Probably not. Can they be reactionary or exaggerate their news? Most likely. Do these types of sites make money of advertising and hits and use inflammatory language? Yeah. But by and large they are more truthful than say CNN and they present a side that 85% of the main stream media won't cover. There is no real unbiased news reporting. A large part of the bias is in the word choices or even the topics presented. OR even in the capacity to run interference and distract from another story. The MSM does this all day long, every day. It is all biased and there is a need to check a variety of sources. Look for facts, not emotional spin. Once you are aware of an agenda it's easier to pick out the spin. Sometimes its difficult to see or remember that the hard Left backed by the worldly elite (for their own reasons) controls the discourse and most of the media! Question all that is said, even on beloved Foxnew, there is a predisposition to cater to estabishment statist Republicans such as Carl Rove, John Boehner, etc.. But still, Fox is more balanced than the others, especially with their news reporting and when you aren't watching one of their commentators. I don't mean any disrespect but CNN does not help the situation. Bloomberg News.... well if you know who owns it, then you couldn't possibly think it was unbiased. Now if you have a different view for America, and you are entitled to it. Maybe you really do believe that the government has to have more involvement in the lives of its citizens, illegals, etc. That's a different story. But I cannot let you proclaim the virtues of CNN to someone looking for media without a liberal slant. CNN only seems middle-of-the-road because NBC is too far Left... Overton Window effect, etc.

I'm a Constitutional Conservative, not a Republican. The Republican Party is liberals. The Democratic Party is socialist-statists. Neither believe in personal liberty and its flipside, personal responsibility. There is a difference. And there is a difference between hard Left-Left and Hard Right-Right. The hard Right as it should has a very small voice, while the hard Left has dishonestly and with outside help, hijacked the media and the discourse. It is a very small minority and uses every trick to advance its agenda, and intolerantly and without principle, advance its agenda to control and bring us back to the dark ages.

If it is true that you are a constituent of the Left and you vote for the current leadership, then you are by defacto scheming to take away rights, including rights to private property including labor time. But lets not get sidetracked. This thread is about finding sources of information. NPR is NOT an unbiased source, and I am not happy about government assistance. I do not recommend it, except to see what the Statists are focusing on at the moment.

So, why is the data from only (3) selected days at selected hours? You cannot be serious analyzing that data...

Even LEOs have to get permission from the School District before they can have them on school property. If you get caught with a shotgun, say you were picking up the children after hunting, and had it with you when you went on School Property, it would be a mandatory jail sentence if discovered.

I would settle for some diaper rash and chafing rather than use that paper to wipe my cheeks with, even if that was all that was unsold and laying about.

I agree, and you should Michael. Get your information from a variety of sources, and then search your feelings, you will know it to be true. Try to analyze and absorb that media, but look for logical arguments and separate facts and logic from emotional expressions and drivel. Don't succumb to the dark and emotional side. Agendas are everywhere!

He's a sell-out.

Back in 2011, "On the Media" host Bob Garfield said, "If you were to somehow poll the political orientation of everybody in the NPR news organization and all of the member stations, you would find an overwhelmingly progressive, liberal crowd..." And, if that is true, and you don't think that they bring out their opinions, agendas, etc. through comments, programming, commercial choices, etc., then you are in dream land. That bias oozes out... It would be nice for "diversity" (especially with public funding and the fact that there are about 25% of population liberal and double that conservative and the rest somewhere in the middle), it would be nice to include "conservative" as well, by the way. And, when listening, you will see that numerous people are labeled as conservatives, even derogatory things such as teabaggers (see Malik, etc.), but you hardly ever hear any mention of labeling such as liberals, progressives, etc. and I believe that is largely because they want to make their "Left" views accepted as mainstream center. The liberal slant of NPR is subtle, but if you are in-tune, you will notice that there are many more obvious liberal stories than conservative stories. If you understand the agenda of the Left, progressive, new-world orderers you will find that the programming is in lock step with that agenda. See which new books are reviewed, ones promoting liberal thought or conservative thought? The messages that these news reporters (very selective and telling only part of the story) spout often talks about sympathy for the underdog, an underdog that is not responsible for his or her own actions. Hours would be spent discussing the need to rehabilitate revolving door criminal thugs and no attention to victims. It is anti-gun, anti-fossil fuels, whenever it can subtly, or not so subtly be brought out. And, really hard-left liberals have a mouth-piece on the station. There was eight years of daily beating up Bush, but where is any criticism of the Czar-in-Chief? . Perhaps the most blatant example was the treatment of the moderate liberal, Juan Williams, because of his "muslim" comment, but really because of his affiliation with Fox News. That would never happen to an extreme-left leaning liberal at the station. We could talk about things like Terry Gross, a totally unbiased liberal, celebrated Rachel Maddow. Hannity's ratings are much higher, but the focus was on supporting a fellow liberal outlet and its liberal programming. This could go on and on... Soros funds much of NPR. That is enough said... But, perhaps in NEW JERSEY, NPR is just mainstream.

In my opinion, as far as CNN goes, there is no middle ground, anywhere. CNNs usefulness can be expressed by its diminishing audience and its capability of only telling a very small slanted piece of the story.

LOL, NPR is Sesame Street for adult sheeple with liberal, statist, dependency tendencies. But to your point, you have to admit the limousine liberals and their ilk do like THEIR cash flow and want to keep THEIR money all the while they are figuring out ways of taking YOURS away through regulations and taxation. Seemingly, these individuals collectivistically, also don't always find a lot of their hard earned money finding its ways into helping those with need. Maybe they feel that that is the job of the government, solely. Anyway, in the spirit of thrifthood and making some crony capitalistic cash, good financial advice is probably given from those familiar with and ushering in the policies to destroy the middle class by and large and take more of YOUR income. It's interesting how the IRS attacks nonprofit Tea Party affiliated groups and yet not only is politically motivated spoon-fed sheeple feeding NPR left alone, it is funded, instead! It is funded because it cannot stand on its own, its pathetic feel-good, take-no-responsibility message has to be government and Soros sponsored.

CNSnews.com The Blaze American Thinker Fox News Gun for Hire Radio