Everything posted by DTtuner
-
Antique Firearms evaluation
Moderators - Please remove. Thank you
-
6 months of waiting, finally paid off :)
Finally picked-up my G19.
-
car taken at gun point last sunday
Where did this happen, exactly? I'd like to know which areas to avoid.
-
Mall Ninja pics
- DTTuner's "Battle" AR 5.56 1:7 Build
Exactly.- Expected Accuracy: .308 NATO from 16" barrel
Sorry, meant sub-10 inch groups.- Expected Accuracy: .308 NATO from 16" barrel
Let me re-phrase the question... What kind of accuracy can one expect, from a 16" FN FAL (New DSA clone) carbine, .308 NATO Factory Loads (not match grade), at 1000 yards? If there are upgrades/accessories that will help with squeezing out that last bit of accuracy, please mention them: Ammo? Trigger? etc...- Expected Accuracy: .308 NATO from 16" barrel
Awww... I love that rifle. Well, my accuracy goal would be sub-10 inch groups at 1000 yards. So not extreme accuracy, but definitely capable of placing a shot were I generally want it at 1000 yards.- The Never-Ending Saga of NJ Firearm Ownership
- What have you sold that you wish you didn't?
My first pistol. S&W 5906 stainless 9mm. I know, not very impressive. But it was my first handgun.- This years winter project
1) Finish my "Battle AR" build 2) Keeping waiting patiently for my PPP to arrive- DTTuner's "Battle" AR 5.56 1:7 Build
Would you agree that the .308 battle rifle is a better platform for the Broad Spectrum Rifle? I've had a long-standing love affair with the FN FAL rifle. However, most seem to agree that the AR-10 is a better platform.- DTTuner's "Battle" AR 5.56 1:7 Build
Update: I kind realized that my build would neither be Lightweight, nor Cheap. So I've re-assessed my build based on many of the suggestions here. Although I do plan to go with both Iron Sites, and an Optic, I plan to remove all other "extras" that I can do without. - No fancy hand guards - No grips, lights, lasers, etc. - Lower will be as light as possible, without incurring extra costs. New order of Priorities: 1) Lightweight 2) Ruggedness/Reliability 3) Budget $) Flexibility The HBAR hurts me in the weight category, but I will have to work with the upper that I have.- DTTuner's "Battle" AR 5.56 1:7 Build
Based on some more research, and the added weight, I've decided against a magnifier. Since this rifle is most effective at short to medium ranges, I will stick with a low-MOA micro red dot. My future .308 battle carbine will hold a 1-8x (or similar) scope, for the longer range shots.- DTTuner's "Battle" AR 5.56 1:7 Build
Scratch the Strikefire... Primary Arms M3. Wow, what a bargain.- DTTuner's "Battle" AR 5.56 1:7 Build
Hmmm... So, by that calculation, is it safe to say that a 2 moa dot will cover 6" at 300 yards? Vortex Strikefire is a 2 moa dot. According to most of the online reviews, and youtube videos I've been watching, it seems to be pretty rugged.- DTTuner's "Battle" AR 5.56 1:7 Build
Will a 3 MOA Red-Dot site work for 300 yards targets?- DTTuner's "Battle" AR 5.56 1:7 Build
Updated original post: Rainier Arms Mini Compensator- DTTuner's "Battle" AR 5.56 1:7 Build
Dang, that's a pretty good deal. Although weight is a concern, I do like that the Vortex Strikefire has the flip-up lens covers, mount, and 2x magnifier included. However, it's twice the weight of the Primary Arms, or Bushnell TRS-25... I also don't like where Vortex optics have their power switch.- DTTuner's "Battle" AR 5.56 1:7 Build
Thank you for the suggestion. The TROY compensator weighs a ton (about 1/2 pound) and I decided to return it. The Rainier Arms comp. is what I am looking for, so I ordered one today (1.4 oz.) Also, the Nordic comp. is on backorder.- Expected Accuracy: .308 NATO from 16" barrel
Oh, that's awesome shooting vladtepes. So I lose velocity, not accuracy?- Expected Accuracy: .308 NATO from 16" barrel
What kind of accuracy should one expect with the .308 NATO round, out of a 16" barrel? Trying to decide whether 16" barrel is worth the weight savings, vs. an 18" barrel.- DTTuner's "Battle" AR 5.56 1:7 Build
So received the UTG hand guards in the mail. They seem pretty darn tough to me. I actually did a mock "roughness" test and bashed the hand guard against my wood bench several times (not mounted to rifle) Not a dent. It did take off some of the black finish. Also mounted a few accessories to the rails. Perfect fit so far. The muzzle brake however is HEAVY. Cool looking, yes. Effective, no idea yet. But I may return it simply due to the weight of this thing.- .308 Battle Rifle Photo Shoot!!
G3 Clone? (PTR-91)- DTTuner's "Battle" AR 5.56 1:7 Build
Please come back. Which hand guard would you recommend? - DTTuner's "Battle" AR 5.56 1:7 Build