45Doll
Premier Member
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by 45Doll
-
They'll be willing to leave. Buh Bye. New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern Resigns Before the October Election – RedState
-
The Federalist chimes in. New ATF Rule Turns Millions Of Gun Owners Into Felons (thefederalist.com)
-
An overview of this kind of incident, and the possible related government motivations behind them. VIDEOS: Americans step up because the police aren’t there - American Thinker Read the comments too.
-
When lamenting your bad fortune regarding the ATF rule change and living in NJ, consider this: you could be in Connecticut. Law-abiding citizens transformed into criminals overnight! - American Thinker
-
Here's a good example of jumping to conclusions and betting the ranch on them. Howell, NJ man hears car alarm and starts shooting (nj1015.com) Please remember to have as tight a rein on your head as you should have on your firearms.
-
#4 in this article is relevant to this thread. But the rest are curious too. 5 New Jersey Obsessions That Have To Be Explained To Outsiders (nj1015.com)
-
From ANJRPC: January 12, 2023. Today, in a stunning development, the judge in ANJRPC's case to overturn NJ's carry-killer law consolidated ANJRPC's lawsuit into the other case that is pending on certain overlapping issues. The judge in that other case has already issued a temporary restraining order halting enforcement of certain aspects of the carry-killer law, and has already thoroughly analyzed and resolved many of the issues needed to make a decision on the remaining portions of ANJRPC's case. The consolidation of the two cases was requested by ANJRPC. The move likely signals more bad news for the fate of Governor Murphy's carry-killer law. Gun owners were well-represented by ANJRPC counsel Dan Schmutter, who made a number of powerful and compelling arguments. The State of New Jersey was represented by the Attorney General's office. CLICK HERE to see the key papers filed in the case so far, including the recent decision and order in the other case halting enforcement of certain aspects of the carry-killer law (see items 5 and 6).Hey Phil... that's definitely above your pay grade.Got some bondage lined up in Vegas?What a cute couple! Were they buying shampoo?These gentlemen know a lot more about the legal implications than I do. It's Andrew Branca and guest. Part of the discussion is a review of the Texas SD statutes. Taqueria Throwdown! Lawful or Execution? - YouTubeAdditional perspective. The relevant DA is a Soros funded prosecutor. Hero Customer Who Shot Armed Robber at Houston Taco Joint Ordered to Face Grand Jury by Soros-Funded D.A.@raz-0 Thanks for that link. IMO the 'customer' is going to have a problem. I count at least five shots after the shooter is down and obviously out (IMO). Especially the last one, which I agree looks like a ND, and the previous three at close range apparently to the head.Have you got a link to it? Everything I found on YouTube is from TV stations and edited.Right. I agree with your sentiment. Even on the way out the door, a shooter could decide to turn and deliver a few parting shots. So IMO when the shooter is on his feet and mobile, he's a threat; take him out. If the entire video later shows the shooter immobile on the floor (with or without the 'gun' in his hand?) and the citizen puts some more rounds into him, I think that will be the legal problem for him. So as you suggested, shooting until the threat is neutralized is justified. After the threat is neutralized more shooting is no longer justified. I suppose a jury may eventually decide that question. Note: Here's an update. Good guy with a gun shoots robber as he holds up customers in Houston restaurant – HotAirThe description of the whole incident with sound (but not video) is that after the citizen shot the robber, as he was apparently leaving, in the back (once, twice, maybe even three times) after he hit the floor he continued to shoot him, for a total of nine shots. I think the citizen is going to have a problem. Even in Texas.Some input on potential SCOTUS involvement from my 'neighbor'.@Mike77 LOL yes that's it. And now I also recall that I bought another product in cans. Wait for it.... Shoprite BEER!. $0.88 a SIX pack. It was cheaper than Coke. Also Pathmark beer. I kept one of each until about five years ago when I finally cleaned out my office for renovation.X-X. Trust the science. Were you the one asking the question in that confirmation hearing? You're right sir! Now that you mention it, I remember the cartoon characters. And the jingle!
