RubberBullets

The fact that this app exists makes me sad. There is comfort knowing there are 2k 1 star ratings and the avg rating is 1.1, 1 being the lowest possible. Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Like double The type, quality, and size of gun safe will all depend on your budget. Cheaper import safes can start at $400-900 for a 24-30 gun safe. 1k-3k+ will get you a modest/good quality, domestic safe with better fire protection, heavier steel, and more security features. The higher end of the gun safe world being a Graffunder can net 5-10k depending on the size. Entry Level Safes: Cannon, Winchester, Bighorn, Mesa Mid Grade Safes: Liberty (they also have a higher end), AMSEC, Sturdy, Patriot High End Safes: Graffunder Check out this video. You will learn ALOT about gun safes in this 27 min video

Customization vs Reliability you say?

Yeah that capital cost has been what swayed me from taking the plunge this year. That 200 is a big % increase. Maybe when times are better I will re evaluate Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

I have to make time for a trip..been a while since I was last at cabelas anyhow. Thanks folks!

Thanks ill look into them. I know he was having a problem with delayed orders and was looking to not wait 6 months for delivery Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Looking for some .45 dies for a friend of mine for his LnL AP Loader. Anyone know of sites or locations that carry them in stock? Hes having a rough go finding them. Thanks for suggestions. Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

When I get to my second thought about this photo I will let you know

Yeahh imma have to go with Mercutio's 9mm dagger. I still contend im going to take a pos 1911 and mill and refinish to look similar (sans compensator) Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Answer: The best fighting pistol is the one which is wielded by a woman most likely to distract their opponents.

Jesus Christ are you trying to break the forums asking questions like that?

The experience isnt the same without the "cow gun" to showcase

It is good to get a basic idea of firearms safety and training ala internet, but there is no substitute for hands on training with a responsible seasoned firearms owner/instructor. NRA First Steps/Basic Handgun Class is a good starting point. People will reiterate on the forum here that Safety is an ABSOLUTE first and priority, then your skills are built through training and repetition. You can rent from a range without an FID. If you plan on going to the range and rent I would suggest going through a few video searches for "gun safety" topics and the like to get to know some basics. If you intend on using a handgun for home defense, the obvious answer is to train with that handgun when you finally do get it, learn the in's and out's of it and become proficient in its use. There is a wealth of info here and no shortage of people willing to help a new gun owner out in person. Good Luck!

I CANT HEAR YOU OVER ALL THAT FREEDOM!!! lol very nice

All dialed in bro!

Im not arguing a police officer has the right to use appropriate force to protect himself and others. My assertion is that this guy should not have been immediately cuffed and it could have led to a much better outcome. Even if you see flags that go off that point to certain indicators, I find it aggravating as a citizen to know I can be cuffed by three PO's because I look suspicious. Police putting down aggressive dogs is nothing new. I believe the anger people have over how this was handled, and the outcome because of it. I guess id have to walk a mile... or maybe 100 in their shoes to understand why their actions were/are standard acceptable practices.

Then I guess I just disagree on the premise you can be physically detained via being cuffed because you are deemed suspicious. To this the video of him just walking back and forth video taping.. To me, that does not appear suspicious considering there's at least one other person recording as seen in the OP. This guy just so happens to be on the other side of the street. I just dont happen to agree that what this man was doing warranted being cuffed. I guess we could play what if all we want..what's done is done and I hope they re-evaluate how they handle situation like this moving forward.

Why cuff someone in the first place in this instance? If he hadnt done anything to warrant an arrest, which apparently is the case considering he was not charged, why cuff first and talk later? Sorry but this guy showed no signs of being a threat giving grounds to physically detain him.

Then again, we are all monday morning quarterbacks.. It sucks that the dog died... We can pick apart this video like we do with everything else.. Ill try to stop myself again

What if he utilized a "doggy seat belt"? Not likely but I think my argument for the hypothetical holds more water than "why were his windows down while he had his dog" Even if he hadnt complied with cops request to lower the volume of his stereo, why immediately put this guy in cuffs instead of speaking with him face to face about securing his radio? *edit* Im not trained to deal with situations as such, but it seems that a face to face narrative might have went a little further than walking up to him and cuffing him because he either had his radio blasting, or the police had a problem with him recording an active investigation. Am I wrong in expecting a progressive scale of handling the situation i.e. verbal request, verbal warning citing the grounds, then escalating if continued failure to comply? I would also understand that being cognoscente of your surroundings would note that the owners dog could have been a potential threat being in the car with the window down.. why not address that concern before anything else since the guy was not an imminent threat (violent/abusive/etc)

If this guy went to his drivers door to key on the ignition to close the window ya think the cops may think he was reaching for a weapon and promptly receive an asphalt sandwich? Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

isnt HTC one sprint or ATT only?