Screwball

https://www.maconarmory.com/ Rudy is the head of the company. He is a supporting vendor on AR15.com, and has his own section in the Industry list. Very good guy, and will make an upper exactly how you want it. He also recently introduced his own .45 magazines, which fit in a standard magazine well. I have his older adapter, which used H&K USC magazines, but he is in the process of getting 15 rounders out. I have the adapter already, so once the magazines are ready to go, I'll be set. Take a look on AR15.com, and if you have any specific questions, just shoot me a PM. If you are local to the Monmouth/Ocean border, we could meet up and have you shoot some rounds through it.

Get a J-frame of your choosing... then send the cylinder to Pinnacle or TK to be machined for 9mm. Done and done.

Been sick all day, so got pretty well through it. Still have a few chapters, but a lot of insight in there.

Thanks, but have a lower on the way to my FFL... got something plain. It actually might be an A3 build, being Stag does the upper I'll be going with, and it has a removable carry handle. I have three, going on four, because I like shooting them... Shotgun wise, I have a total of nine... and that doesn't include a .410 upper I have. Hunting shotguns, I have two 11-87s; one is a dedicated slug gun, the other is a field gun. There are different roles for different guns. My ARs are setup for specific roles. My first one was a 16", with an Aimpoint and magnifier. I do have the .22 and .410 uppers that I specifically used with that lower... but I could toss them on the other lowers if needed (I like the .22 on the next lower I mention). After that, my second AR was a lightweight pistol caliber rifle. I made a D/I .45 ACP rifle that is under seven pounds. Originally built it for an ex that had issues shooting, but made sure it was something I'd like if we broke up... which happened before I pieced it all together. My third AR was more of a scoped one, but combined it with my first FDE build. My guns usually are traditional colors... black, blue, nickel, stainless, and/or wood. Wanted an AR with some magnification, and it sort of bridges the gap between my red dot ARs and my .308s (whether it is the NM M1A or my Remington Model 7). This upcoming build, I wanted something more utilitarian than what I have. None of my ARs are basic as an M16/M4 clone... and since I hate pinned stocks, the A2/A3 look was best. I would like to toss in one of those binary triggers and have a third position... but don't think it is worth the money. But that is the beauty of the AR... you can have 10 ARs, and none of them be the same.

Double post... love Tapatalk.

While the other points do move people away from C&R, I say this is why you don't see people post about them. I love historic firearms. With the exception of the Krag, I have most of the major rifles of the US military from the Trapdoor up through the M14 (it's an M1A, but as close as I can get; I do have ARs, but my upcoming build will be an actual A2 based one). I have Yugo, Russian, and Romanian guns that are C&R... but also have modern (and NJ legal) versions of other firearms (1911, Tavor, Henry 1860, a few of the Browning shotguns). I'm actually a member on a few of the C&R forums that you (capt14k) are on, but I really don't use them for any more than referencing information. While I don't sporterize guns, which actually turns me away from most rifles, I like my guns shootable and looking decent. If I purchased a $300 handgun, and want to refinish it, I shouldn't be guilted into shame because I chose to do that. I had a Winchester 1897 from the 1920s that I wanted to turn into a "modern" shotgun... which was fueled because of the takedown mechanism with the design (you can store an 18" barreled gun in an 18" container). I opted to not do it due to the wear on certain parts (sold it), which made the reassembly difficult, but if I did, I would have been tarred and feathered for it. I did pick up an IAC gun, which is in riot configuration... but a solid frame design, so can't break it down. I have a refinished Greek M1903 that I sent to DGR for a rebuild. Again, I like rifles to look good, and while I thought DGR was a good place, Dean (when he was alive and running it) sent me back a rifle that he did $1,400 worth of work on with a broken rear sight that I repaired prior to sending it in. Windage would work, but you would have to start it with your hand... which my OCD really didn't like. This was about when I got my Garand (a Century built Lithgow receiver... which functions great with a brand new Danish VAR barrel), and also a PU sniper, but couldn't sell the M1903 without a huge loss. So, looked around and had it turned into a USMC sniper reproduction. My collection is pretty unique, and I like having things that aren't common... that being one of them (most people build/buy A4 reproductions). I never have stated that gun was an original, and always made sure to state it was a reproduction when talking about it. On another forum that I'm more associated with, I made a thread about the rifle, and mentioned who did the work. Was very impressed with them (Iron Sight INC). Also vented because the mail lady decided to leave this rifle sitting outside in the rain... without a signature or and bags. Luckily someone noticed it early and got it out before the padding soaked up. But in any event, most people were interested in it... as it wasn't a common variation. However, one guy has to stop in and tell me that isn't a USMC sniper rifle... and will never be. No crap, I said as much when I wrote reproduction. Then, I was lectured on how I destroyed the history of the rifle, and pretty much, I'm a bad person for doing it. Well, my money went into the work, and I'm happy with it... so, last time I checked, someone who didn't put one dollar towards the gun has no say in what I do. Likewise, the C&R section of AR15.com is ran by similar people... but a little more excessive. I got a magazine extension for my PU sniper. Not restocking the gun with a polymer stock, but also nothing that required any permanent modification to the rifle. Again, same opinions about it. But I then noticed the thread was moved to General Discussion. Why? It is strictly about a C&R rifle, which doesn't show any modification. Moderator pretty much said, "tough!" Stopped posting in that section after that. I picked up a compensator for that same rifle off eBay. Again, something I never saw... but figured it would be unique. Happened to see people talking about it on a C&R forum... and it was like sacrilege that the guy used a bayonet, cut the spike off, and welded/refinished it. Better design than the clamp on ones that usually end up being shot down the range. There are definitely C&R guys that are a wealth of information. And most are good people to talk to. But when new people cross that line, isn't it better to maturely discuss why they feel like that was a bad decision than just call people out? C&R is such a closed group because of that, as I rather get called out for a modification I made on my AR being a bad choice for a reason than just the modification being done on a C&R rifle. Someone refinished a stock, it did take them time to get to that point. While it might not be "right" for some people, condemning that person pretty tells them that the investment they put in (time) and their achievement (being happy with how it came out) isn't worth anything. That is a very good way to drive people away from C&R guns... and even firearms, in general. I personally don't care what others think. If I did, I would have the collection I have. While I know there are guys that have S&W 3rd Generation guns in 10mm... how many have an FBI 15 round magazine for theirs? People have Trapdoor rifles... but how many have a Custer-era Carbine? How about a 9mm Airweight, which is notably called a 942 (one was produced, and S&W never followed through after Wiley Clapp said nobody would buy it)? How many people have a D/I .45 AR? And how many people have practice grenades to use with their Yugo M59/66s (at least one other member, because that is why I got one [emoji41])? Only thing I could get to make it better would be a .45 Luger... well, I'm sure there are some in between, but that would be cool.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/151865472X/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_beHEybMYCRR44 I am a chapter away from what you are asking about... but a very good read on the subject. Author does mention the RPR as a very good buy, but didn't have direct experience with it. I held out from picking up rings for my rifle until I'm done with the book. I picked up a used Remington Model 7, and a Leupold Mark 4 4.5-14x scope (Black Friday sale).

Can't ever have too many... I have 9, and then a .410 upper for my AR.

Nope, but they standardized on one when the X95 was released due to the earlier complaints. Might have been a little earlier, like when they started shipping PMAGs with the rifles. I do have one from my SAR, which is the updated the design. All I can say is the Geissele pack and trigger make it a lot better... even if it was an improvement.

But that's the thing... that gun doesn't meet his requirements, due to the ejector not being replaceable by the shooter. There isn't a shotgun design that meets the requirements (that I at least know of), so the OP needs to see what points are important to him, and which option is the best fit. It stinks to say, but that is something he needs to do the research and decide for himself. I made my decision years ago... and still have the 870 sitting next to the bed. Only difference is that I have an Ithaca nearby, as well.

The trigger was updated on the SAR to the one that came over with the X95. All new SAR rifles have that new trigger.

Correct... in that short window from 1987 to 1996, they were really 87s. Same exact gun, though. But the barrels that came with them were marked either way... not just 87.

Nope. It is an early-1990s Ducks Unlimited Guide Gun (non-slamfire gun). My father has one that the previous owner cracked the wrist of the stock (very uncommon stock, but he loves that shotgun). I picked that up to put the stock on his gun for his Father's Day present. When I was done, I had to get a stock whether I was going to keep it or sell... decided to keep it (I like the design). Had Rose Action Sports shorten the barrel down to about 20", and thread for Remington chokes. I then sent it to Robar for NP3 Plus, which is why it looks the way it does.

That is correct... and how the 1897 design is, as well.

If you go to Dick's make sure your FID and D/L match EXACTLY. My middle initial/name is on my FID, but not on my D/L. It is on my Social Security Card, but not my birth certificate... which DMV goes by. Anyway, never an issue with any FFL in this state... except it goes against Dick's firearm sales policy. Other people have had similar issues, like living in Oakhurst, but the FID says Ocean because that department filled it out (same zip codes).

Someone put the gun away with a live round in the chamber... while the injured guy was at fault for not checking, shouldn't have been a round in there. What happens if someone pulled that gun out and handed to a new shooter... not familiar with gun safety? Should have been checked, but people get comfortable very easily.

Maybe they should have done that instead of taking D/Ls for range use... and not talking about renting only. That actually turned me off, especially considering they make a copy of your D/L when you fill out the waver. Turned me off even more when I questioned it (they used to not do that), guy behind the counter got snippy with me. While they are leaps and bounds past Brick Armory... I hope they do the right thing when they find out who is at fault. Don't know who the injured employee was, but there should be some other repercussion than a hurt hand. It should be instinct to pick up a gun and check it. Lucky it was only an isolated injury... but could have been a lot worse.

Meaning the shell is stuck in the chamber? Butt to the ground and pile drive the shell out... not really that different from a gun that ejects to the side. If you mean double feed (failure to eject), you put your finger in the receiver and yank the loaded shell out from the lifter (arms do spread). If the fired shell is still in there, close the bolt and recycle it out (that would be short stroking the gun, and something to train on). Ithacas can jam (the KSG has the same things to contend to, as it uses a similar system), if ran incorrectly. I don't see that being a widespread problem. Do have to remember, people usually post on the internet when they have a problem... not regularly when their gun is functioning 100%. While it is a part that can break, training yourself on the gun should put enough rounds through it that it would go somewhat early on. I've personally have yet to have one break... and know quite a few people in the same boat. Any design can fail. Simple single shot, break open shotguns have failed. Stuff happens. You buy a good design, run it to make sure it works, and you move on from there. Again, if something is going to fail, it should happen in training... because that is where majority of your use will occur. Could the ejector go when you really need the gun? Of course... but you'd get a shot off. The primer could fail to ignite. An AR could jam, a revolver could lock up (even a no-lock one), a semi-auto pistol could have the magazine slightly ejected (giving you an empty chamber, which would be answered by tap, rack, reassess). While you should train to failure (training without failing isn't actually training... it is just running through the motions), don't obsess with X part breaking. Familiarize yourself with the gun, and know how to keep it going/maintained. If a serious part breaks, get it fixed and weigh if you want to keep it in that role. If you don't like the Remington for the ejector, go Mossberg. I have those two designs, as well as the Ithaca. I prefer the Remington, then the Ithaca, and followed up by the Mossberg... mainly for controls. I like to be able to eject the round in the chamber on the 870, but keep the magazine from loading one in the chamber (Mossbergs, you just have to dump the other round). Like the safety/action release on the Remington/Ithaca over the Mossberg. But having the 870 bedside should be enough of a good example that I trust the gun.

Short answer... nope. Longer answer... look around for an older trade-in 870. Look for exterior finish wear, but good internals. If it is too ugly, refinish it. My 870 Police... Oh, and there is nothing wrong with Ithacas. Run the gun correctly, and it will function 100%. Older Ithacas would fill in for an 870, just making sure it isn't shot to hell. My Ithaca...

Water... that's it. Well, then clean and oil as normal.

Ability to make it your own... Was going to post a shot of each of my three, but realized I didn't have a current picture of my first AR. DPMS stripped lower, ACE stock, Spikes 5.56mm upper with AA piston kit, topped with an Aimpoint PRO and magnifier (have a Surefire 6PX on it, as well. But I also have a Safir .410 upper and a Spikes .22 upper with Lothar Walther barrel (Bushnell 3-9x scope). That was my first... so I wanted to just have one lower with a few different capabilities. Then, I wanted a pistol caliber rifle to pair up with my Beretta CX4... Spikes stripped lower, Macon Armory D/I .45 upper, with their USC magazine adapter. They just designed a new magazine that fits in the standard AR magazine well, and should have a 15 rounder out in the near future. Topped it with an Aimpoint CompM4s. Then, I wanted something that wasn't black... and figured I'd extend my range a little bit. I pieced it together, but Aero stripped lower, Aero built upper, topped with a Weaver 1.5-6x scope. I may do one more... possibly an A1 or A2 build. And I may hide away a lower for a rainy day. But that is why I like an AR... you have a $100 lower, and you can do whatever you want to it. I do have a WASR. I do have a Tavor. Have a Garand and a M1A. And have an SKS. While they are all great rifles... you don't have the flexibility of the AR platform. But being a somewhat modern US design (has a few years on the M1A/M14, and more on the Garand), still in use with the military, and somewhat affordable... you really have to come up with a "why not?"

In this state only... just like blackpowder guns. That, in itself, is asinine.

I went with the SAR. While they are similar, I liked the controls on it over the X95. Rather the magazine release in the rear, and the charging handle forward. Not a fan of rails everywhere... did an Aimpoint PRO, and a Surefire Scout light on the side rail with a pressure switch. That was it... no vertical grip, nothing else. But I also did a 16.5" version, and had Steve from Monmouth Arms pin a muzzle brake. Doing a bullpup, I want it as short as possible... not an 18" barrel with a crappy brake. The X95 does allow for you to swap the grip to get a traditional trigger guard, and has the rail. But the X95 was designed for sub 16" barrels. IWI had to lengthen it for importation... so the SAR is technically more "correct." I've heard about accuracy issues with the X95, but don't think it is as big of a problem as made. To choose... look at the charging handle location, magazine release, and forend. Triggers of all new rifles should be upgraded and good to go. I did the Geissele trigger and trigger pack... and WOW! Didn't adjust the trigger any, but if I did mess with it, I don't think I'd trust it on the rifle.

Worked well in my 92 Brigadier Inox... Made a video of its springiness and profile that I posted over there. Easier to just link it to here. https://youtu.be/b-O96OOrZiI Good to go, but expect some minor work. Don't see people needing to go to the extreme of polishing... but I have a sample size of one.

I agree here... My girlfriend had a Sato (mutt from Puerto Rico) that her friends brought back from a vacation... and he is such a smart dog. Protective, loyal, and is by her side constantly. He was too attached to her, so we got a puppy from the SPCA... originally from Tennessee. She is probably a mix between shepard and coonhound. Most lovable dog I've ever seen. There are so many dogs in shelters, especially in this state, so I can't recommend a family dog without saying to check out a shelter first. They usually have great records of the dog, and will caution you if there are any risks. First time owners are given a lot of info to help them, and if you have a dog, they prefer to have them meet beforehand. That is what sold us on ours.