voyager9

Is…there a guest room?

The Supreme Court almost never takes interlocutory appeals. They will wait until 4ca rules. At the same time SCOTUS took no action on the challenge to the IL ban so it will probably get relisted.

Pretty much the scenario everyone was afraid of when that part of the “safe space” BS was passed. Some Karen panicked while a CCWer was securing his carry piece in his trunk.

The problem is all these Centers become academic laundering mills where the state can push its propaganda as legitimate scientific studies and experts. These are then used in court cases as briefs or evidence.

I had no idea those retirement communities in FL were so cutthroat. Did they have the wrong color pool noodle or something?

Does that mean Tex’s wife is back in the state? On topic, it’s too bad it’s so cloudy. There would be a chance to see the Northern Lights.

So his comment was no comment. What an ass.

The ATV driver. If the ATV is going fast enough that post-collision it had enough momentum to roll 100 yards down the road like the Indiana Jones boulder then that is excessive speed and reckless driving (in addition to driving on a road closed to vehicles). Sure. The chances are somewhere between 0 and 100%. The cop weighed risk/benefit and chose to block the road. A safe play since it is clear that the ATV driver didn’t have control and was going too fast to stop in time. The way you’re blaming to cop makes me think you are the ATV driver.

MR ATV is now F=MA

You’re right. It’s totally the pedestrians fault for being pedestrians on a pedestrian-only road. They definitely should have moved to the gravel so that the illegally-driven ATV could safely illegally drive. The reason there was no time to stop is because of the speed of the illegally driven ATV. The legally walking pedestrians were in less danger with the mass of the car in between them and the illegally driven ATV. Sure, he could have set up further back but then the pedestrians would not have been behind him. Hard to protect pedestrians from the ATV when they’re both in front of you. And how do you know his emergency lights were off?

Thanks for this. It wasn’t clear from the video that it is a pedestrian path. It looked like a dual use back road. It wasn’t a street. It is a paved pedestrian path. There is no expectation by those using it of any vehicles. What would a cop be expected to do if a dirt bike was careening down a busy sidewalk in the city? Second, the police car had stopped. Any force in this equation LITERALLY came from the ATV.

Key point. There’s no way this doesn’t die in committee.

First, a poster child for why banning standard-capacity mags is bad. Second, also training. Third, don’t turn your back on the enemy.

Citarelli‘s only platform was “I’m not Phil Murphy”. While that is a platform to base a campaign on, it isn’t much of one.

Finders keepers…

The argument is demonstratively false considering there have been a non-zero number of mass shootings where the shooters used small magazines.

Typical state fear-mongering arguments. Them pushing that numbers don’t equate to common use is nonsensical. Judge asking about ruling for the standard capacity mag ban but against AR (features) is concerning. Smacks of interest balancing which is explicitly forbidden under Bruen.

I like what another person said: strip it down to just the lower and leave it up on a cinder block.

Schmutter should have told Sheridan that sledgehammers are also protected under 2A and that needs based scrutiny was prohibited under Bruen.

In NJ a Right is only for the left due to all the jughandles. I agree though that there was zero reason this case stalled back at the district level the second time. Even the CA case that was remanded all the way down has hit the 9th again.

Simpsons did it.

If anyone knows beating with 3”, it’s you.

I mean.. I think I see corn… jus sayen.

Probably a bad analogy. Car manufacturers get sued all the time. There was one where Jeep was sued because the automatic braking was an optional feature.

You spelled Trans Visibility Day wrong. /s