ryan_j

You should see a show from close up. It's louder than at the range.

Yes, I would rather have them disarmed if that's what it takes for them to scream that we ALL need the right to carry instead of them demanding a carve out. Why is it so hard to understand that there should be NO special classes of people who get the right to carry more than others? Other states do it this way, why is NJ special? Any non-felon with a clean background should be able to carry. Period. Retired LEO should be exempt from the training course requirement due to having training as a LE but other eligibility criteria should be uniform across the board. The 2nd Amendment never said anything special about retired police. It was about the right of the people, not the right of the police, to keep and bear arms.

I would recommend NRA basic if you are doing it for nonresident CCW as some states require basic.

SC requires no front plate.

That's correct but there's another wrinkle. Local discretion. The local judges issue the permits and many issue unrestricted carry after you've had a restricted carry after a certain period of time. In NYC it's the NYPD and they are under a different set of rules.

,....

NJSP asked me for two envelopes too. It's not a big deal really.

NJ2AS has been doing pretty much all of this already. Need more people though.

The cops only cared when they saw him filming. They keep changing their story. It is civil disobedience. Whether or not it was taunting is debatable.

What statute says it has to be unloaded if you have a FID to make it legal to possess?

Yep it's stupid and unsafe. I don't like license plate covers too. If you're driving on public streets your vehicle needs to be clearly identifiable.

Cops were pissed at this guy because he sued the department before because they arrested him for filming before. Sure he was deliberately trying to piss off the cops but it's called civil disobedience. Besides they didn't even bother with the music until he started filming. They were more worried about that than the music, guaranteed.

TWINKIES ARE BACK!!!

Yup. I carry firearms in my vehicle quite a lot since I go to Pennsylvania a lot. Don't want to attract undue attention. I was just curious as to why so many. In NY Ive seen them on every car even the Bugatti veyron parked outside our offices I saw one day.

I'm not talking about historic plates. And yes both my vehicles have front and back plates.

I'm seeing a lot of cars without them now. Not just mustangs and camaros and other sports cars but even cheap VWs and other ordinary grocery getters. Did the front plate requirement go away?

On Verizon tethering/wifi hotspot is included with the new shared data plans. At least for iPhone it is.

I have the direcTV apps for iPhone and ipad. Works really well.

It's not LEO but my wife has a civil service job in NYC. She took an exam a few years ago for a promotion. She had to fill out thick packet of forms. We had to list all of her private details and also mine. All my credit card and loan balances and all of our assets plus we had to show our tax returns. The city wants to make sure you're not taking bribes or stealing from them. Remember this is all stuff that you and I the taxpayer asked for, accountability for public employees. All of this is forwarded to the dept of investigation who will then take their sweet time to do a background investigation. You take the promotion immediately but DOI will follow up if they find anything of concern. I can therefore completely understand a LE agency you are applying for a job at asking for a list of all your firearms and other private and personal data.

Interview with the dog's owner: http://www.mrconservative.com/2013/07/20435-man-who-was-arrested-had-dog-shot-by-police-gives-tearful-interview/

Well, due to the Moore v Madigan case, those counties have decided to not prosecute. If you have a FOID card you are good to go. Most counties have passed a pro 2A resolution. In BigDaddyHoffman style... (fist shake) Ooh Rah

So no tolls for me then since I will be taking I-84 to I-81.

You may be breaking the law because your parents place isn't your primary residence. Your hoboken apt qualifies as a residence even if you rent. You don't have to own it.

I wasn't talking about may issue. I was talking about need being required for issue. MD and HI have this along with NJ. RI also requires a "proper showing of need" even though they are shall issue. RI is essentially NO ISSUE in practice because of that. The AG uses a loophole to exercise discretion. However they have local permits. NY is on a county by county basis, as is California (some counties in CA are shall issue in practice). Other states that are may issue like you said will accept "self defense" or "all lawful purposes" as the reason. Connecticut for example will accept that. The wikipedia chart is a good reference since it breaks down what is the statute and the practice. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concealed_carry_in_the_United_States

The bill was better than what the democrats were hoping for. They were hoping for a may issue bill/no issue in practice like how it is in NJ or NY. But Quinn is behaving like a petulant child, and essentially throwing a tantrum here. They don't want concealed carry. Liberals generally fear an armed populace.