Stonecoldchavez

I ordered some of their ammo on Veteran's Day. Some Reman; some brand new. I shot the .45 reman and had no problems. Good stuff. I was disappointed in the free shipping though. I ordered on Nov. 11 and didn't receive my order until Nov.27. Yikes. No reason as to why it took over two weeks.

Thanks Johnny B and Screwball. I will ask him.

The is the 'wheels of justice'. The Courts and Judges are a big problem. The Legislature too. The Legislature have removed the Judges ability to use their own discretion when it comes to bail reviews and sentencing.

Thanks for the replies. He is offering them to me for $350 for both rifles, if I am interested, along with 400 rounds of ammo. He said the 91/30 has the hexagonal barrel; the carbine is round.

My buddy has offered up to me a chance to buy two Mosin Nagant rifles he has, plus some ammo to go with them. I know nothing really about these rifles. What is a fair price to pay for both of them? What are good years to get? Or stay away from? What should I be looking for in regards to quality? Problems? He told me the rifle is from 1928. The carbine is from 1943. Any tips or insight would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, S.

True we need more blacks and women to petition the media and politicians. I try and get more women involved every chance I get. We have to convince them it is about their safety and that guns are not evil like the media portrays them to be.

Depends who is the "huge minority" is. Look at the dopes, the Black Justice League (bwah!) protesting at Princeton University. Less than a hundred dopey college kids have a two day sit-in and the school president already caved to their "demands" of removing Woodrow Wilson from the building name. Less than 100 dopes.......we have a few thousand gun-owners on this and cannot get any traction with the slimes in Trenton. Is it the message, the delivery, or the numbers?

Have you tried a junkyard? When my ECM went bad on my truck, I checked online junkyards for places that had the same year/model/motor ECM. Got it shipped to me; replaced and never looked back. You just have to get the right model ECM bacause every year the manufacturer's change something. S.

Old Glock Guy, Two different states; two different rules. Kane is elected in PA. Hoffman is appointed by the Governor in NJ. I signed the petition, but tend to agree with Newtonian. Christie is a short-timer. Eyes on a bigger prize; he could care less about NJ and our gun rights. Shame the NRA is not holding him to the fire for the comments he made in the spring about setting up the committee. Even if he signed an EO in January, by the time the SP get around to doing the paperwork and creating the new rules, the next Dem governor will replace Christie's EO with their own. The easiest thing I would think the SP would do is make our FID the de facto CCW permit. We already have been vetted by getting it. No need to do another background check. Other than the State would want to collect MORE money from us by having us all refile again. The FID card and the P2P is already redundant anyway.

I thought France was a "gun free zone"? If one person was armed, they may have prevented more damage done. Or at least survived to retreat. But France, like Britain is a "gun free zone" country. Their people are sheep to be slaughtered by the muslim wolves. Yet somehow they were able to get weapons? They are already here. Do you think they are going to attack in Texas or "Gun Free Zone" states like NJ and NY? We are sheep waiting to be slaughtered. Just like NJ politicians want us to be.

You think Sweeney and their ilk care? They will be protected. It is us, the populace, that will get slaughtered like sheep. I would like to think that if one person was armed at that restaurant in Paris, at least some people would have survived and the terrorist would have been dead. The people of France are sheep, just like we are in NJ. And the people of NJ are too stupid to realize it; they keep electing the same people.

I would if I knew what laws they are misrepresenting. There are people here who know what is incorrect better than I.

Did they clear up the issue of hollow points with this statement? "Provided certain conditions are met, a sportsman may transport and use hollow point ammunition. There are no restrictions preventing a sportsman from keeping such ammunition at his home." I too, am confused about this statement. Since when does it have to be locked container? "The firearm should not be directly accessible from the passenger compartment of the vehicle. If the vehicle does not have a compartment separate from the passenger compartment, the firearm and ammunition must be in a locked container other than the vehicle's glove compartment or console. I apologize if this has been clarified. S. PS: Someone should email the SP and tell them their website is wrong and misleading.

I have a Kris Kyle "The Legend" t-shirt I got from: http://www.forged.com/collections/men

I believe it was the civilian access to "high capacity" magazines.

jackandjill- I used the War On Drugs argument. He said that you cannot compare the two because assault rifles are designed to commit mass murder at one time. He feels LE and the military should be able to have these weapons and not civilians.

True. They claim it is racist against blacks and latinos. It is the same thing when the people of Trenton call the cops and want them to be heavy-handed. The first time they are the city folk then scream "police brutality". Cannot have it both ways.

mipafox- I just did with one of them. thanks. *Edit* He responded. His argument with the survey is most of the responses are by small (less than 100 depts) and that the numbers may be squewered against LEOs with larger depts.(more violent crimes).

Old Glock Guy- I said those things to both of them. I was told "civilians should not have access to weapons that can kill cops or mass killings of school children". I was then asked if I should have access to plutonium to make a nuke? For real...... I mentioned how well drug laws are working. Nothing. "I cannot compare drug laws to weapons designed to kill large masses of people".

mipafox- They are not all bad. I was not bashing them; they are entitled to their opinions. I just find them very hypocritical with the "they can have it, but you cannot mentality". In fact there are many I work with that think the same way as many of us do here. I have gotten many great ideas from them.

You cannot argue with a liberal like maintenanceguy said. I am having the same argument with two people in LE after last weeks Oregon school shooting. One, thinks no civilians should have any firearms at all (that comment really pissed me off) and that no civilians should have "high-capacity" mags or access to "assault rifles". His snarky comment was I have a better chance of shooting myself in my home, then me ever stopping someone from breaking in. I shot back with, "why do you have a fire extinguisher in your home?". He then called me a "paranoid gun-nut". I came back at him with FBI.gov statistics and he asks me if it is alright for civilians to have access to rocket launchers and tanks? Doh! The other LEO doesn't think civilians should be completely disarmed, but that there should be limitations put on people as to what they can have as citizens. Isn't this great? Two LEOs sworn to uphold the Constitution and I am debating with them about our Rights. I also quoted the "shall not be infringed" and he responded with "remind me what well-regulated state militia you belong to." He asked me "why do I need an "assault rifle" specifically designed to kill people? You should be restricted from owning a weapon whose sole purpose is mass murder." I responded, with "I am a law-abiding citizen and I want one I can have one". His response, "What a childish answer, 'because I wanna'". How do you argue with that way of thinking? A third LEO jumped into the debate and said we should bring back the assault weapons ban of 1994; that it was Bush's fault for not renewing it. After that ridiculous comment I walked away.....

The range I go to in Falls Township, PA has the 5 shot "rule" which only 5 shots can be fired in succession. They do not allow rapid fire. I dont like it, but I think it is one of the old-timers (current President's) rules.

Try working in Trenton. At night. And you will see the real Zombieland. All kinds of creatures come out at night. It is like the Twilight Zone. There is a reason most businesses close shop around 4pm when the State/County workers are heading home. Here is what I have: http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/product/BAG-186?td_source=search

OP, I was recently in the same boat as you. I just recently purchased a Springfield Loaded.

Got back Sunday night from my friend's cabin in Upstate NY. Oompha, what a long drive. Got to shoot almost everyday out in his back yard. It was so nice. Unfortunately, only his rifles. Got to shoot a mix of bolt action and semi-auto .22's, .223, Saiga in .223, and few lever actions in .357 and .44 Magnum. The .44 mag was a nice Marlin. It is weird how Upstate NY is totally different than in the City. Everyone we talked to (we went to a few gun stores) hates Cuomo, hates the Safe Act, and they want to secede from NYC. They are pretty much unrestricted up there except for the same AR BS laws we have and the 10-round magazine limit. We kabitzed back and forth about NJ and NY laws. They mentioned that Cuomo would have lost the election if a few "lazy people" (their words) in the surrounding counties would have "gotten off their asses" and voted, indicating that Cuomo did not win by that much. Every vote counts, no matter how inconsequential we think it is. Also, it looks like NYS loose millions of dollars in revenue if they were allowed to sell AR's. Pretty foolish of them. At a LGS, my friend learned he can get a non-resident carry permit in NY because he owns property and pays taxes. We learned what he needs to do to apply. We learned that each county is just as corrupt as NJ (again not my words), that a judge is the one that issues the carry/purchase permits and that they can deny you but have to show cause and give a reason. That each county up there is different and it can take anywhere from 90 days to 8 months to get this carry permit, depending on the judge. We also learned that every gun you want to carry HAS to be listed on your carry permit. You get a "coupon" that is good for one year to purchase a gun. If you buy a new gun, you have a certain amount of time (depending on the county again) to get it added to your permit in order to carry it. Once it is listed on your permit, you can CCW anywhere pretty much, just not in places where more than 50% of sales is alcohol, church, schools, etc. And not to list "self-defense" as the reason you want a CCW permit. List "Target shooting and Hunting". No ammo purchase logs either. But Cuomo did want ammo purchases to go through NICS, but they said it has gone nowhere due to funding because it would be too costly for NY to do it. Of course, you can carry in all of Upstate NY; just not in the 5 Boro's.