dutchman

Article discusses how someone easily hacked a smart gun. https://www.wired.com/story/smart-gun-fire-magnets/amp

Thanks a bunch for posting this one!

150 rounds 55 or 62 grain $54.98 Also picked up some Winchester .223 60 grain PDX on closeout 20 rnds $12.97 I know its Dicks, but these prices are pretty good, esp the PDX.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/435564/gun-rights-concealed-carry-second-amendment-new-jersey-us-congress

It was my first handgun. 45 years later I still own it and shoot it regularly. You can't go wrong with a 10 and there's always a market for them if you choose to sell.

NJ Politics as usual in my view. Gun law violations like this don't play well in free amerika and she is black. 1. The NJ State Atty Gen reports to Christie. 2. All County prosecutors report to the NJ State Atty Gen. 3. Christie doesn't want the NRA or opponents hanging this around his neck for his 2016 run for pres. 4. QED Someone in AC got a phone call. 5. PTI The only thing CC gives a shit about is furthering his own political ambitions. Although based on what I know I think PTI is the right call and we shouldn't punish others for the legislation and actions of the morons that get elected here.

Look at Nikon - Outstanding quality for the money, especially the lower price points. I own 2 rifles with Nikon scopes.

Thanks to the free states, we may be off the hook (and I know its effing msnbc) http://www.msnbc.com/all/democrat-we-will-reverse-smart-gun-law

Enjoyed meeting you all Jack

See you there Jack

+1 Look forward to meeting you all

SCOTUS declining to take a case is effectively a ruling against the petitioners.

Temporary hold denied - Law is now 10 rounds in Sunnyvale during appeal process http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/03/new-test-of-gun-rights/

Both the Federal District and Appeals Courts upheld the 10 round mag limit ordinance of Sunnyvale, CA. Six Californians have appealed to SCOTUS. We now wait for the response to the appeal. Note that 66% of Sunnyvale voted in favor of 10 round limits. http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/03/new-test-of-gun-rights/#more-206184 At least SCOTUS didn't decline to hear the case at all.

Couldn't agree with you more, and I always use children's drowning in pools stats when debating safety with antis. We must recognize that we are a minority being discriminated against and vocally oppose this - just talking among ourselves on a forum does our message no good. Here is what I sent to my reps. Here's an easy way to find their electronic mailboxes 1. Go to link below 2. Select municipality 3. Click on Find Representatives 4. Check the boxes 5. Have at it http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/SelectMun.asp

I think there has to be something else here as the law (as currently amended) is as follows and I can't find any mention of this case anywhere Source: http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2012/Bills/S3000/2804_I1.HTM

The statute states certain LEO exempt "for official use". Wonder if that means their off duty weapons must be 'smart?'

I had a similar experience with a minor error on a change of address. Detective Burns of the Lawrenceville PD got it fixed in one day - the chief of police was available. It should be easy to get this fixed assuming the chief who signs them is around. On the other hand, if your FID was issued by the NJSP YMMV. dutchman

Just a note to say hello and many thanks to all who have posted on so many topics that affect gun rights (or the lack thereof) in the Peoples Republic of NJ. As someone who got his gun education in the mid 1960's in southern Georgia, where a CCW was a 'pistol toters license' one got at the county courthouse with little formality, I must admit that a lot of NJ is really culture shock. You need to be a guardhouse lawyer to own a firearm in NJ. Everytime I read this forum I learn something and for this I would like to thank the many posters who share their knowledge, even for repeated questions on the same topic. You are all much appreciated by folks like me. Hope to have a chance to meet some of you at events in the future. dutchman

Massachusetts has a similar law - ammo components (including spent .22 rimfire cartridge cases) are defined by statute to be ammo and can only be possessed if one has a MA FID. Any tree hugging bird watcher that picks up a spent shotgun shell in a wildlife reserve is a criminal in MA. Can't wait for one to get snagged by this BS.

Why does Medford require 'fresh prints' if your prints on file are more than 5 years old? I changed address with prints more than 25 years old. Looks increasingly like Medford is making up its own rules.