bruceleeon

We are all here as friends and should absolutely treat each other with respect! Even though we may not agree...

This image clearly shows the dog retreating and the officer pulling out his weapon before approaching the animal. That... is intent.

I would respectfully disagree with you. Approach an officer with a hand on a weapon and see what happens. You can try to use the excuse that a hand on a weapon is not intent... I don't think that will fly. Hand on a weapon when approaching a dog that does not know what you are doing is intent. That is MY opinion and I understand and can appreciate yours... however, I don't agree.

How do we go about getting this 15 round limitation repealed in NJ?

THANK YOU!!!! This is what I am talking about.

Personally, this is absolutely intolerable. This should have never happened. The officer is under investigation already for brutality and improper use of force. This is a clear violation of the man's rights and the officers should be punished for that alone. Add to it that the officer approached the dog with his hand on his weapon already and you have a person that intends to use lethal force. I think this officer should be punished to the full extent of the law and the other officers should be punished for violating this man's Constitutional rights. The man was fully compliant with the officers even though they were not compliant with the laws themselves (demonstrated by turning around and not resisting in any way). They took the walk to detain him, he didn't walk towards them. They started man handling him... not the other way around. They are wrong, plain and simple. I hope the courts determine that this type of behavior is wrong and that the department compensate this man somehow. Money will never replace a best friend, but it sure hurts the other party when they have to hand it over. This officer should be fired and the others should be suspended without pay (for detaining the man who is well within his rights).

I have a 229 (.40 S&W) from 2010... different serrations and grip, but overall just a fantastic piece. I love shooting it, but I shoot my Glock far more (only because it is easier and MUCH faster to clean). If I didn't have to clean my guns... I would shoot the 229 all day long.

This was the first range I ever visited... after my visit I decided to shoot at RTSP in Randolph. BIG Difference. After that experience (not that RTSP was bad... RO was great, staff was great - HG is cleaner and air conditioned) I ended up signing up for the Crackshot membership at HG. I am a new shooter and EVERY single RO there has been very helpful.

I don't want to ruffle any feathers by getting an officer upset or in trouble for the statement should he visit this board... but I am in warren county.

Ah, that's what I though. I am thinking about taking the class for the UTAH at the range I frequent. Also, I was hoping that the CCW sitution would loosen as police coverage in my area is dwindling with the shared resources initiative. I had an officer tell me ... and I am quoting here... "We are in reactionary mode in your area... no patrols"

I waited 14 days. However, my FFL told me that the SP claim to be back to instant sometime next month.

I thought it was impossible to get a CCW permit in NJ...