Mr.Stu

His additional words, outside the majority opinion are of limited power. They are not binding because he didn't have 4 other Justices sign on with him.

Until they get smacked down I'm making use of it where I can. For example: I walk my dog daily in town - I carry while doing so I am a frequent competitor and match director. I no longer have to worry about the directly to/from nonsense when traveling for matches or practice. Having an NJ permit opens the door to a PA permit where I travel fairly often. Not NJ related directly, but because of the Bruen decision I now have my MD permit.

NJ also says that a TRO is inappropriate because no-one can say whether they will actually arrest anyone for breaking these new restrictions because nobody has been arrested yet. Surely, if NJ has no intention of enforcing the new restrictions, why did they write them and why are they trying to prevent a TRO to block them?

You're absolutely right. I have no idea why I got a permit either. I'm just going to burn it and call it a day. ANJRPC, FPC, SAF, NJ2AS, et al, can you guys just give it a rest, please?

That's what they bank on - wear you down with their incessant BS until you roll over just to make it stop.

Extensions to what?

I have been lucky enough to shoot there one time. A friend was an employee at their pro shop and worked some magic. It is very, very expensive. The kind of expensive where you don't apply to be a member - you may be invited to apply if you are lucky. Even then, I'm told the annual dues are in the thousands. It is very, very, very nice there, though. think exclusive country club, but with shooting ranges instead of golf.

I've been carrying this for the last couple of years.

I've had a Canon Mf634Cdw for over 5 years and no bed poop in sight. As with all these things, YMMV and samples of 1 are statistically insignificant. I don't think getting your employer to pay for it makes an EcoTank ET-2850 a professional printer

Encouraging news from NY - SCOTUS has ordered NY to submit a brief/position paper to explain why the 2nd Circuit's stay of the temporary injunction should stand. Don't forget, this is Sotomayor's region.

Having endured the inkjet drying out before it was used up thing for way too long, I went for a Canon MFP laser. The cartridges last a lot longer and don't dry up between uses. Having the scanner function has made keeping copies of all the records for permits much, much easier. I store the scanned images in Dropbox so I can get them from my phone too.

Yes. The short version of pretty much everything you have posted on this subject can be summed up thus: It has always been crap. It is currently crap. It will forever more be crap. There's no point fighting any of it because even our fighters are crap. If you can't see how negative that is, perhaps you really are Eeyore.

OK @BigGuns - I'll give you the admission you so desperately seem to be looking for. So far, none of the unconstitutional statutes you mention have been knocked down....and yes, you are right, some of them have been standing for 4 years and plenty more much longer and they still have not been knocked down. What you are seem to be failing to understand is that legal cases move exceedingly slowly. Courts frequently allow 45 days for responses to motions and another 45 days for replies to those responses. That's 3 months gone for a single argument. Is it nuts? Sure, but that is still what it is. Now look at the Bruen decision. That is 6 months old. Do you really expect multiple cases to be resolved in 6 months when it can take 3 months for a single argument to run through the court? Next, try to be objective when looking at the history of these cases. Do you think it would have been better to lose (picking at random) the mag capacity case 2 years ago and have to start from scratch with a new case post-Bruen, or to have an active case with the briefs establishing the facts already in place when we are given the tools that were handed down in the Bruen decision? For more than a decade the lower courts that hate the Second Amendment have dodged the Heller test and used a 2 part interest balancing test instead. Bruen told them in no uncertain terms that they can't do that. We have the most powerful legal tool we have ever had and the vast majority of the statutes will fall as a result, but it takes time and effort. The lawyers working for us do not have infinite resources, both in terms of money and time and they are prioritizing what they work on for the most effective use of the resources available. You may not regard it as complaining, but all you seem to do is cast shade on the efforts and progress that has been made. You are not helping, and you are drawing energy away from those of us that see a better future. Is that your objective? I have given you the admission you wanted. Can you be satisfied now? TLDR: Yes, you're absolutely right. Have a nice day and Merry Christmas.

I'm not so sure it will be that onerous. NJSP could have made it really difficult to get the training required for an initial FPIC and what did they do? They set up a slide show your have to sit through. As they say, don't borrow trouble.

Yep. There are no details yet what the criteria might be for getting approved status.

The expansion tank will just be connected to the radiator circuit. The place to refill the system will be nearby, most likely, but not directly into the tank.

I'm going to assume you have hot water radiators, not steam. I know nothing about steam systems. Do you have an expansion tank and a pressure gauge? Is there a permanent feed of mains water into the system or do you have a shut off valve for adding more water? It sounds like it could be that you have lost some water out of the heating circuit somewhere, but if you can bleed the radiators there must be some pressure still - is there pressure to expel air from the highest radiator in the house? Losing water could be a burst pipe, but I would doubt that if you have pressure remaining to bleed air out. It is more likely a slow loss of water over time. It is possible the bladder in the expansion tank has failed. If so you can squeak by temporarily by feeding water in to build pressure, bleed the radiators some, feed more water, etc. Just be careful to leave the pressure at the lower end of the scale with the system cold when you're done with the process. Then schedule getting the pressure tank replaced ASAP.

That's why there is a delay on the training requirement. The Superintendent of NJSP has to come up with something. Hopefully it will be as simple as the slide show they came up with for the first time FPIC applicants.

Oh yeah. I know that. I just don't want to be in jail while I wait for it to happen.

I was just re-reading the statute and spotted something else I hadn't noticed before. The 'sensitive places' section refers to any firearm, not just handguns. This means the possession of rifles and shotguns which was previously allowed by obtaining an FPIC has also been gutted.

If you register as a D you get to vote in the D primaries. It takes far fewer votes to change the outcome of a primary as many people don't bother to show up to vote in them - markedly fewer then the actual election, even. By forcing the incumbent D out of the vote, you raise the chance of the R getting in just through name recognition.

We got JN thrown out. That hurdle is gone. Many of us have been carrying regularly for a few months. PA permits are now available to us too. Bruen also means that I could get my MD permit which should be showing up in the mail any day now. Did you expect the gun grabbers to just roll over? They moved another set of goal posts. However, another thing Bruen gave us is the quashing of the interest balancing nonsense that the lower courts have been using to side-step Heller. Look at the Federal District Court rulings in NY - they have stomped the CCIA hard. Sure, the 2nd Circuit still needs to be brough into line (overseen by Sotomeyer so not really surprising), but there is an emergency motion to SCOTUS to fix that already. We fall under the 3rd Circuit which is overseen by Alito. When whatever the District Court says on the 2 cases filed so far is appealed, it will go to the 3rd Circuit and hopefully Hardiman will get them. He's not going to uphold A4769. Instead of pooh-poohing the progress made, why not try to find something positive, or suggest a course of action that will make you happier. You remind me somewhat of Eeyore.

From the owners manual:

Does anybody have any idea what this is supposed to mean? 2C:39-6(g) is as follows: g. Any weapon being transported under paragraph (2) of subsection b., subsection e., or paragraph (1) or (3) of subsection f. of this section shall be carried unloaded and contained in a closed and fastened case, gunbox, securely tied package, or locked in the trunk of the automobile in which it is being transported, and in the course of travel shall include only deviations as are reasonably necessary under the circumstances. This has absolutely nothing to do with carrying with a permit. 2C:39-6 only applies when you do not have a permit and are relying on the exemptions.