MauserCollector

I've been on a Mauser buying spree. Here are a couple Norwegian K98k 1939 147 Matching 1922 Brazilian Mostly Matching 1908 Uruguayan Matching Re-Arsenaled

Ooh spell check changed it. You're such a genius. You've just been hiding it this whole time. I knew it. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

You can say it all you want it still doesn't make it true. Taylor Ham is a company that makes Pork Roll. Until you produce a package that says Taylor's Ham only or Taylor Ham Taylor Ham (makes no sense) you are wrong. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I never said PACS throw their money away. It is money well spent. Forums are for 3 things IMO. Entertainment and Talking smack, Learning, and Brainstorming. So far no one has come up with the answer so bribery is just as good as anything else at this point. I said spending money on Weinberg will not work. I'm talking the Dems in NJ who don't feel strongly anti gun. I would be curious as to Congressional PAC donations. Buying a US Senator is the hardest thing to do. Since you didn't find it in your research Israel gave $360M to Senators and Congressmen. In return they got an increased $30B Aid Package. Which for the record is against U.S. Law. I don't have a problem with supporting Israel. They should change the law. It is one example of money well spent. Another example since you mentioned him Joe Manchin. He was the one screaming how bad Zohydro was. Now do you think he cares for one minute about opiate addiction? If so your wrong. Look who his biggest campaign contributor is. Mylan. Coincidentally his daughter his CEO of Mylan. Mylan makes fentynal and they wanted Zohydro killed to bring their own hydrocodone time release med to market first. Joe Manchin is a Senator who is bought and paid for. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I guess Super Pacs for industries exist for no reason. I guess they just like the candidates and pool their money for the heck of it. How much do you think Isreal gives to U.S. Congressmen? Why do you think that is? The money is being raised by a Super Pac made up of all current 2A groups. Can even get gun manufacturers to contribute. Yes I am thinking outside the box. The reason is because nothing anyone has done has succeeded. The one lawsuit going on thought outside the box and may have the best hope. It is going to take either Federal Intervention or thinking outside the box. For the record screw Evan Nappan myself and two other people I know contacted him and got no response. Based on how he handled the one lawsuit I think he maybe a plant for the antis. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I don't know I've seen tree hugging Dems vote how the oil companies want. We aren't going to flip Loretta Weinberg but maybe some of the others. I figure quarter million campaign donation could influence someone to support 2A who normally wouldn't, but isn't a vocal anti. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Super Pacs are not illegal. I am tired of the PC BS. You want to call it lobbying fine. We all know they buy votes. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Moral Also is no one will want to steal a Honda. I'm only kidding Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Ok envious it is Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Ok believe what you want Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

It is when applied to the seeds. That is commonly accepted. At least I thought it was. Why I am debating this I don't know. You want to eat the latest and greatest chemicals be my guest. I don't care. I don't want to eat them, I can afford to buy food without them, that is my choice. States should have choice too. It shouldn't be dictated by federal government.

I thought it was over. Darrenf correct me if I'm wrong but didn't 10x just say GMOs killed bees? Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Now that is over. Why don't the second amendment groups join forces and form a PAC and actually get something done. Informing the informed about gun law changes will get us nowhere if the legislators are Dems, but buying their vote can get things done Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Hopefully then we will start seeing European Honeybees in abundance again because personally I rarely run into bees like I did years ago. Still doesn't change the fact that the EPA change their stance on pesticides. https://www.epa.gov/pollinator-protection Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

When was that debunked? What is killing the bees? This was from January 2016 http://m.motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2016/01/epa-finds-major-pesticide-toxic-bees I believe your info is from March 2015 https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2015/03/23/usda-study-concludes-neonics-not-driving-bee-deaths-as-white-house-set-to-announce-bee-revival-plan/amp/ Who needs to stay informed? Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

The use of chemical pesticides Neonicotinoids on the seeds so that it grows up through the plant. That would qualify as GMO. http://www.globalresearch.ca/neonicotinoid-pesticides-ongoing-death-of-the-beas-epa-slapped-with-lawsuit/5334816 I am not a big environmental person. I watched a few shows about the deaths of bees and it is a major concern. If I cared enough to debate this I would spend hours researching to prove my point. I do not. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

See when you read look at what was quoted in response. 10x said it isn't that simple to label. My response 60 nations do it. That was not my rationale for doing it. I believe states should be allowed to pass laws for labeling foods as GMO. The federal government should not pass a law telling the states they can't. Not going to debate it now. You have your view I have mine. When the bees are gone let's see who was right about GMO. The law was passed due to lobbying which means cash. My point is buy politicians get what you want. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

They are just jealous OP or don't understand in a free state you have the option to carry a firearm when going to meet a stranger. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

My point wasn't it is the reason to do it because others do. My point was it can be done. Re-read. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I really don't care to debate GMO foods. Monsanto is a scummy corporation that owns politicians and can get them to vote however they want like many other companies that give millions can. My point is if we give millions to politicians as one group we can change their vote. I think that is the easier path than getting out the vote. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Why not require labeling? Why should a law be passed that doesn't allow states to require labeling? With all the bees dying and a strong link to GMO crops shouldn't people have the info to be given a choice? http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/258708-gmo-labeling-is-good-for-consumers-and-business Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

How about labeling of food that is intentionally genetically modified. 60 other nations can do it but we can't. That is similar to the argument it is impossible to remove 11 million illegals. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Says you. Personally I like to know what chemicals I am eating. GMO labeling is not difficult, a simple GMO stamp would suffice. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I'm not complaining I'm just wondering why we don't have one group we could all donate to, form a PAC, and then buy politicians? It definitely looks more effective on federal level (I know GMO labeling is federal) and half of the state reps aspire to get to federal level. Super PACs are perfectly legal. I'm just not being PC and calling it how it is. I could just say give large donations and behind close doors ask for favors, but they own the politicians. Look at Soros Hillary and Jill Stein are his Demiwhores. For the record I like you more than NJ2AS already. I'm still waiting on the Meg Fellenbaum arrest report from them. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Thank you for that informative post, but wouldn't the Super Pac route be the best way to go? Let's face it politicians are bought and paid for. Why else would they vote against GMO labeling? What good is informing voters in this state? It has gotten nowhere. Why not instead buy the Democrats in the Assembly and Senate? The few that aren't for sale in the heavy Dem areas buy their opponent early in the primaries. If NJ2AS won't play nice why are they still around. You didn't mention SAPPA what is their deal Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk