MauserCollector

Let's not speak of OH12 it was kind of embarrassing. Focus on WA8. I hate the Eagles, Giants, and Jets. I am a Panther Fan. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

OK so those 2 split one tribe to make 13 and the fake tribe is really 14th tribe. I get it now. [emoji23] Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Who are the 14? It is 12 tribes according to the link you sent me. Now you are confusing me. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

True. It is interesting that we ended up at the 13th Tribe and Zionism. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

More conspiracy but honestly it was the first I heard of it. Curious to get the book the 13th Tribe. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Then you aren't even Jewish. I fell down that rabbit hole over the weekend. The whole 13th tribe thing. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I thought your people were one of the real tribes? Rothschild are Ashkenazi Zionists. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

That use it or lose it is the exact problem that needs fixing. I find it odd that suddenly many GOP have forgotten about the national debt and running deficits. Unless they are really talking about hitting the the reset button it is bad policy to continually run Billion Dollar yearly debt. I do think the reset button can be done, but every country would have to be on board. Some people would get hurt by it but it would be good for the majority in the end. The ones who would be hurt the most is the Rothchilds and people like them to which I say good. They have made their money off the wars of nations for centuries. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

The way I read the purpose of the testing was to switch from 5.56. I guess that could just be an excuse to use up the budget so it isn't but, but that needs to stop at all levels of government. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Testing with a purpose if there isn't a problem and no intent to switch is wasting money. Your R&D argument fails here. If you haven't noticed we have $21T in debt. I know you aren't a Conservative, but others claim to be. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

So testing is a waste of money. Can't call yourself conservative if you are willing to accept pissing away money on anything which includes the military. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I agree. I think Creedmoor shows the most promise. Which oddly enough is very similar to 6.5 Swede. What is old is new again. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Honestly I lost interest in it yesterday when I posted funny how but because Mr I like to post in people's for sale listings acting like a Mod when he is not decided to jump in I had to keep it going. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Nope you haven't followed anything correctly. Brookdale offers 095 Reading Comprehension Courses for that problem. 1. Black Rifles worth have decreased 2. 5.56 and 9mm are not as effective as 7.62NATO or .30-06 or .45ACP. No one said they were ineffective. 3. I count my friends on one hand. Everyone else is an associate or enemy. 4. U.S. Military is looking for new rifle. 6.5mm is leading the testing. Likely Creedmoor. In the meantime M14 is still being used on the front lines especially DMR by Spec Ops. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk United States. Why do you think he acted like a lunatic on Piers Morgan, making all firearms owners look bad. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Di$info Jone$ works for the government. This whole banned from social media is a ploy to try and gain back some of his credibility. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

At least someone got it. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

It was more than just the goat. Again said I found the article interesting. Also posted link to article from 2017 for you to read, not that history would change over the course of 13 years unless new documentation was found. I don't find a need to play tacticool ninja so I'm not really that concerned with 5.56, but I will argue one side or another just to piss someone like you off. In all honesty I haven't fired any AR in well over a year. I have plenty of other firearms to take to the range. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Did you just make that up and hope no one would call you out on it? Maybe the second highest July but not even close to the second highest in history. Also NICS checks mean little IMO. As the population grows so will NICS checks. Also 27 states don't require a NICS check and instead use an alternate form of permit. For example if CCW is an approved alternate form of permit one does not need to undergo a NICS check to purchase a Rifle. https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/does-permit-qualify-alternative-nics-check-if-purchaser-using-it-purchase-type-firearm https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/permanent-brady-permit-chart Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

How many times do I have to tell you conspiracy theory is a government created term to try and silence the truth. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Interesting concept. You maybe on to something. Tonight's elections results I think will give us a pretty good indication of where the public is trending. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I didn't overpay for it. At $600 I am not taking a loss on it. Anyone following closely enough knows exactly what I paid for it. I was more surprised by the number of rifles selling for $400 and not just here. I thought 6.5 Creedmoor was the new hot round. That would make sense to me? 6.5 Swede is a great proven round. 224 Valkyrie seems like another round for people too cheap to step up to a larger platform. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Not at all agree with me or your wrong. I said can we agree there is an issue with 5.56 and that is why they are testing new options? If that is not the case then why are they testing new options? is it just to use up the budget? If that is the case maybe the budget should be cut. Never suggested cutting all funding just the funding for the R&D for a replacement to 5.56, which would only be necessary if there is nothing wrong with 5.56. How do you even deduce from that statement that I suggested even for a second to take away all 5.56? I thought that was a logical train of throught. Just because something is 50 years old isn't a reason to change. What happened to the adage if it isn't broke why fix it? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Are there threads outside 1A? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

It could very well have been the powder. Just read an article that blamed most of the M16 failings on the powder too. I relayed a story about actual use from someone in Falljujah. There are other as stories about ineffectiveness too thus why they are looking to switch. I am sure there are plenty of stories about effective use as well. The after action reports from Westmoreland Command in Vietnam I think need to be taken with a grain of salt. At that time it was all about number killed and many reports were inflated. My info regarding the "tanker" Garand came from the Ranger at Springfield Armory. He said they were working on developing one from the ones made in the field and sent back. If it is wrong info you will have to take that up with him. Is the info incorrect about who was issued M1 Carbines in Korea? A collector friend who was in Vietnam and took frequent trips into Laos and Cambodia said they were not very happy with the M16, but they were happy with the foreign made weapons they did carry. Can we agree there is a problem with the 5.56? If not, then we would have to agree the United States Military is pissing away tax dollars and funding needs to be cut. Which is it?

Which article is that? The one with all the citations? I respectfully think you don't know how to read an article and look towards the citations. Also said I found it interesting not looking to prove a point with it. The point proving was with the previous link regarding the M1 Carbine. If I wanted to provide a detailed report on why 7.62NATO is a better round I could do so. However the fact that both the Army and USMC are looking for a more effective round is enough proof for me. Here is another article for you. Now this has 2 links to statements made right in the article that will further the point if you click them. You won't have to go through the bibliography and manually find the article that further enhances the writers point. http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/10147/the-army-is-once-again-looking-to-replace-the-5-56mm-cartridge Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk