MauserCollector

I'm glad to hear you guys are ready. I hope the plan is injunctions first like California did, but there are a lot of suits that can be filed based on existing laws. Especially considering the changing makeup of the courts due to Trump appointments. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Good job reaching out. Who we really need to get the ear of right now is Steve Sweeney. Remind him of his previous NRA A Rating. Other than the courts he is the only chance left of stopping these bills from becoming laws. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

He has gotten thousands in C&R and antique transfers. I rarely sell anything in NJ anyways. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

He is a cop. Of course he does. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I agree they have served their country well, and are far more important that Snookie or a Kardashian. However it is their country and I could give a damn about their marriages. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I was thinking the same thing. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

My rule of thumb is buyer goes to seller or I'll meet them at Monmouth Arms. I wont make the mistake of meeting them at that other shop that shall remain nameless....for now. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Scientology Don't need to drum up support. Made decision with wallet and will vote with feet. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

7th time it is just one part of the overall plan. It is less expensive to file suits than to answer them. Other lawsuits need to be filed as well such as denial of right to protect one's self and family by denying CCW, by taking so long to issue permits and FPID, state taking away property without compensation for magazine limits, state violating sporting use if new AWB passes, state taking away or devaluing property for collectors if AWB passes, state imposing unjust costs on a right (not a privledge like other licenses) as a form of discouraging firearms ownership in violation of the second amendment, state violating second amendment with any of their laws because shall not be infringed means just that. There are plenty of lawsuits that can be filed and should be filed. Just because there are few on this forum that feel the same way about collecting as I and others do does not mean that is a majority opinion. As I said I and other collectors can easily vote with our wallets and feet. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I did in the other thread. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Most collectors I know do donate to candidates as well as 2A Organizations. Collector organizations are not political. Though maybe they should be. Calguns happens to be one that is. A forum with many collectors and other firearms owners that is leading many lawsuits. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Do you even know how the civil court system works? Suing them personally would be a Hail Mary as stated and would have no intent of being heard by SCOTUS. When collusion is done to infringe on rights it doesn't matter if they are supposed to work together or not. The fact that one is passing the Unconstitutional Law and the other is enforcing it makes the Civil Rights violation that much worse, but again it is a Hail Mary that can win but is being done to force the state to defend multiple suits. You keep bringing up 10A but you are completely wrong. States can not violate Second Amendment, First Amendment, or any other Constitutionally Protected Right.l, under the guise of state rights. Obama Executive Orders were Unconstitutional. Cop violates ones Constitutional or Civil Rights they absolutely get sued personally, and often lose. So does their superior, police department, and the town or county or state depending on the situation. That is up to a court to decide, not necessarily SCOTUS. Also for the 5th maybe 6th time it is a strategy to stretch the state thin while at the same time it is a Hail Mary that it could win. You say it would lose, but how can you say that not knowing the facts of the Right violation. No they can not be sued ex post facto of a SCOTUS ruling but the constitutional violations for suits I would be looking for would be clear violations. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

If I am donating my money towards a group damn right I want to be represented by said group. Since ANJRPC doesn't seem to give a damn about collectors interest they get none of my money. Very simple. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

That collectors are too small of a group to worry about their plight. There are bigger fish to fry. Funny thing is FUUDS say the same thing about Black Rifle owners. I find it ironic. Not sure how you got not breaking law from what I wrote other than cutting and pasting two sentences. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

The irony just hit me. Of those that posted C&R and collectors are too small of a group to care about their concerns, how many of you cry about the FUUDS not giving a damn about your concerns (ARs, 30 round mags, etc)? Everyone looking out for themselves is why nothing changes and nothing will. Personally I care about all 2A infringements, even though things like mag limits, pistol grips, adjustable stocks, and flashhiders only affect less than 5% of what I own. However I am smart enough to realize a fractured group, that is outnumbered to begin, with will never win. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I think I showed that the modern youth rifles meet minimum length requirements. Yes the list in the link provided is long. Rifles that are shorter than federal minimum requirements. All my rifles except 4 are C&R and I shoot all of them except 1. So for me all rifles on list are for shooting. As far as NJ goes I don't care anymore. I am in exit mode as are many others. Even Commiefornia where you have to register everything recognizes C&R exemptions for SBR. NJ I'm sure does not. Nothing happened during Whitman Admin and nothing happened during Christie Admin. In fact we lost ground on 2A during both. I was optimistic until I realized that everyone is concerned with what they are interested in and the hell with everyone else. Which I fine ironic that the people cry about the FUUDS, are the same ones that say collectors are on their own. It's not important. I predict you will all lose more ground because of those attitudes. I thought the lengths of the youth rifles I provided and 1894 Winchester implied the same thing. I don't know about new rifles nor do I really care about them. Though I was willing to fight for anyone's right to own them without magazine or other restrictions. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Rifles that are exempt from NFA because they are shorter than federal minimum lengths. Many are 14" barrels. Similar to pistols such as Luger and Lahti with stock that are exempt from NFA. https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ecalguns%2Enet%2Fcalgunforum%2Fshowthread%2Ephp%3Ft%3D1447218&share_tid=1447218&share_fid=17954&share_type=thttps://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ecalguns%2Enet%2Fcalgunforum%2Fshowthread%2Ephp%3Ft%3D1447218&share_tid=1447218&share_fid=17954&share_type=t http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=1447218 Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I'm serious too. NSA has every purchase, every email, every text, every post. If you buy ammo online they know. If you use credit card they know. If you use cash and talk about it on phone, forum, or text they know. It is wrong and an invasion of privacy but they don't care about the average firearms enthusiast. Unless of course they decide to patsy you. In all seriousness I did work for a former Sheriff who spent time training police in Kosovo. After retiring he took job with Homeland. He oversaw a small group that picked up "chatter" and if they thought it was important they passed it on to him. He then went through it and filtered out most of it, because it was nothing important, and then he passed along to the next level anything he thought could have been something. This was 10 years ago and he told me they could hear and see anything digitally transmitted i.e. phone calls, email, text messages, etc. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Cricket and Chipmunk are both over legal min lengths with 16 1/4” barrel and 30” overall. There are plenty of approved rifles like the 1894 Winchester Carbine that fall below the legal minimums. List is huge. Someone posted it recently on calguns. Little Buckaroo is even longer overall at 33" and barrel is also 16 1/4". Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I'll let you know. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Do you really believe NSA doesn't know exactly what we all have? They do. Doesn't matter what is posted on forums. For the record all my firearms are well fed. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

For $750 shipped in every state except this hell hole, Hawaii, CA, and now Washington State you can have rifle shipped to your door and not pay any transfer fees. Thank "Pro 2A" Christie Admin for that. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Yes North is a whole lot closer but CMP Forum reports were a lot better for South Store, especially for IHC. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

It wasn't an attack on you but on the dealer spreading the misinformation. You should be able to trust what a licensed dealer says, but I have found most know very little and makeup a lot. I had more than a few dealers at Oaks insist as a NJ resident I couldn't buy a Hungarian M44 Mosin because of the bayonet. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Well you are allowed to buy a rifle for your child, but still the must have kid present to buy youth rifle or only kid can have youth rifle is ridiculous. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk