MauserCollector

This law has multiple grounds to which to file lawsuits. One is lack of compensation. California Firearms Owners successfully got a Federal Injunction against the new 10 round magazine capacity law. Previously magazines over 10 rounds were grandfathered. New law takes away grandfathering. Common Use Grounds is another regarding AR-15 Rifles and the defacto ban. The law makes all Military Surplus Semi Autos with detachable magazines illegal except for the German G/K43. This should allow challenges on common use grounds. M1 Carbine is one of the most common rifles owned and it helped save the Free World and Defeat Imperial Japan. They were sold direct by the CMP, a government entity, yet they are illegal in NJ. Rifles such as the Swedish AG42B are used in competition shooting. That would certainly fall under common use. Other Collectible Semi Auto Milsurps with Detachable Magazines would have to be sold, destroyed, turned in, or have irreversible harm done to them by the removal of the bayonet mount which would greatly negatively affect value. How would the state compensate owners when condition is a huge factor? Lawsuits must be filed. If the laws are too costly to the state they will be forced to back down. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Link was official state cold case list. Total vs population of area is important. Look into some of the cases a little more and number of suspected serial killers. Seems disproportionately high to me. Here is a quick synopsis of just a few of the linked cases. http://www.onlyinyourstate.com/new-hampshire/unsolved-mysteries-nh/

Drastic swings are not the sign of a healthy market. They are the sign of a manipulated market. Only the big players or manipulators know where it is going to next. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Definitely is different. I just always assumed there was no restriction because so many people upstate had standard magazines. Actually if it wasn’t for all the press about SAFE ACT one would probably still assume there is no restrictions upstate since so few have complied. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I'm at the point of anywhere but NJ/NY. Went to my kids school tonight for concert. Same school I went to. School looks the same. People not so much. My family was the only family near me speaking English when we were walking out of the school. The others weren't speaking Spanish. It helped to reaffirm why I collect Finnish Arms. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Maybe that's why I didn't think there was a limit. Thank you for the info Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I don't think there was a mag limit in NYS. Limit is 10 round now. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

A lot of bad juju in NH. Especially Bartlett Area. https://www.doj.nh.gov/criminal/cold-case/victim-list/index.htm Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I think we should support the 5 round limit so they pass it over the 10 round limit being proposed. At least we know the courts will likely strike down 5. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

There would be no need for insurance if there was tort reform but the blood sucking lawyers would never allow that. Being that many legislators are attorneys tort reform is hardly even spoken of anymore. Some states at least have loser pays laws. This helps to limit frivolous lawsuits. Especially the fake injury and disability claims. Most importantly if there weren't so many scumbags looking for a payday from an injury, usually caused by their own stupidity, insurance rates would be lower. In today's day and age we should also be able to eliminate insurance agents. Most people could just as easily plug numbers into a system like they do and buy their insurance direct. That would save minimum 10% right there.

How about we talk FTF I'm right down the street. Then maybe you can straighten things out. My info comes from town and minutes of the meeting. Which anyone else can read the minutes online. I agreed memberships can be sold but they are really unlimited range time. It's more of a technicality between private and public. I have nothing against either range nor do I work for or with UHGC. I did think the pre membership comment about not the right way to do business was out of line because being a private club their situation was different. For a public range it may not be the best option. Every situation is different and everyone makes their own decision.

You watch too many movies. Do you really think someone who is low risk without a criminal record will end up in Rahway or Trenton. If they ever even see the inside of a prison cell it will be in a low risk facility. If everyone stuck together on the issue they wouldn’t be able to enforce any of their laws, but it is quite clear there is no solidarity. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Remember that is current cost. Years ago it was a lot cheaper and faster. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

SAPPA IMHO was either a hook for a money grab as Peel mentioned, or the work of a crazy serial frivolous claimant. Also in reference to @Mrs Peel post I was not able to find any tax filings for NJ2AS. Are they not a charitable organization? I could find them for ANJRPC.

How's bitcoin doing? Just lost 50% of its value from the high. Where is the support level at? Who knows; technicals mean nothing when there is no real value. The big boys know where it is at because they have been manipulating it all along. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

]Yes he was the one complaining about secret meetings. I agree with keeping plans guarded. What I disagree with is half revealing things. When teasers are ran it is usually for promotional purposes. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

That video said a whole lot of nothing. Secret Legislators who are going to stop certain bills with their magical powers. Hopefully I am wrong, but until I hear names, what bills exactly, and how, I am leary of anything said. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

What about Monmouth? Other than Asbury Park, Long Branch, Neptune, Freehold Boro we are Red. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Well that tint certainly didn't look like a good reason to pull her over. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

That means businesses will be leaving NJ en masse or more will pay their employees under the table. Also means illegals will be voting more than ever in NJ. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I don't recall looking in Riverton. I was actively buying foreclosures at sheriff sales before everyone started doing it and would check houses out before sale. Monmouth was slow that week so I took look at Burlington County. Went to Burlington, Beverly, and Delanco amongst other towns. Was pulled over in Beverly and accused of being there to buy drugs. Luckily I had my foreclosure list with me. The cop told me he pulled me over because they only see white people in Beverly buying drugs and advised me not to buy anything there. I took his advice. Ending up buying one in Medford Lakes. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

From what I remember the river towns were rough but that was 15 years ago. I really couldn't understand it. Did they improve? Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Riverfront towns in Burlington or Camden County? Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

What is it about the Poconos that one should stay away from? Yardley seems to make the most sense to me. Northern New Hampshire seems a much better choice than Southern New Hampshire. However there seems to be a lot of unexplained missing persons in New Hampshire. Multiple Serial Killers Possibility? Corrupt Police? Vermont is entirely too Liberal. Maine looks to be an option for those moving North. If anyone wants to move to a truly free state that should remain free I think you need to go to Indiana, West Virginia, Kentucky, or Georgia. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

That is old case law. Did you look for any recent case law because according to the case law you quoted from 1979 and 1989 the reason for the stop is to ascertain registration and residency. With computers today they should be able to do so without actually stopping the vehicle thus the case law would not apply and it could be a good case for new case law to be created. So yes it could be argued that the stop was unwarranted and the case then thrown out. The second part is seeing a CCW should not be probable cause for a search. If the woman did not give permission to search or gave permission under duress there is a possibility of getting the search thrown out. The duress argument would be a long shot. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk