Sniper

OK Greenday, here is Obama's statements when Bin Laden was killed, let's see if you can spot the difference between his statements and Trump's this morning. Please report back: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2011/05/02/osama-bin-laden-dead

Well, your friends at CNN (your bible for accurate news) took the time to show their MAJOR TDS by dissecting every one of Trump's statements today. If anyone wants to see some MAJOR TDS in action, just read this article. What a waste of electrons... The 41 most shocking lines from Donald Trump's Baghdadi announcement https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/27/politics/donald-trump-baghdadi-death-isis/index.html

Just FYI, even though our Special Forces do an unbelievable job every day, it was a Special Forces K9 that chased al-Baghdadi down the tunnel, causing this terrorist to detonate his explosive vest out of fear. It was the K9 that forced his issue, and the K9 was the only injured warrior of the raid. These dogs are tireless warriors, that just look to serve. I haven't heard an update to his condition yet.

The TDS... it never sleeps, even when terrorists are killed! Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ · 2h BREAKING: Obama CIA deputy Michael Morell on CBS "Face the Nation" slammed Trump for engaging in "locker room" talk about bringing back the slain ISIS kingpin's "body parts," arguing he should have shown more respect under Islamic customs like Obama did w Osama bin Laden's body .

He should set them up, and tell each one a little bit different story line. This way, when the leak shows up, he'll know exactly which one leaked it.

Isn't it past the point of ridiculousness that the President has to hold back on telling members of the Congress in the other party about secret plans, to keep them from being leaked out???? We've become a Banana Republic.... ...."The president said al-Baghdadi had been under surveillance "for weeks" and changed his location frequently to avoid detection. Mr. Trump said he first learned of this specific operation three days ago. Mr. Trump said he did not inform congressional leaders, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, of the raid beforehand, out of fear it would leak publicly. Pelosi demanded the administration tell lawmakers about the raid." https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-major-statement-sunday-9-am-et-white-house-says-trump-will-make-a-major-statement-2019-10-27/

Here's Pelosi's statement today: ....“The death of al-Baghdadi is significant, but the death of this ISIS leader does not mean the death of ISIS. Scores of ISIS fighters remain under uncertain conditions in Syrian prisons, and countless others in the region and around the world remain intent on spreading their influence and committing acts of terror. “This month, the House passed a joint resolution on an overwhelmingly bipartisan 354-60 basis which rejects President Trump’s green-lighting of Turkish aggression into Syria against our Kurdish partners, and calls on him to present a clear strategy to defeat ISIS. The House must be briefed on this raid, which the Russians but not top Congressional Leadership were notified of in advance, and on the Administration’s overall strategy in the region. Our military and allies deserve strong, smart and strategic leadership from Washington.” https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/102719 What a un-American bit*h..

No, they will say he was "grandstanding" to take the heat off the impeachment issues. The MSM will say we were cruel, and should have invited al-Baghdadi out for lunch, to talk about it, instead of hurting him.

The other issue, besides the visible serial number being seen, is the metadata in the photo itself that can give location, and other personal information on the photo. This metadata can be more revealing than the serial number of the gun, which is all databased. Ask the boiled rib guy about those details, he knows it all.

Kinda makes us law abiding citizens look like idiots for following the law, doesn't it?

What's this fire starting material you speak of? For me, fire starting consists of using one finger, to flip the switch to get the gas logs to light. Then I don't have to touch it for the rest of the night, and the flames are always perfect. Your way sounds like a lot of "work"...

Wow, you really are expecting miracles, aren't you? Some people just aren't as special as they think they are.

It's sad that some people are clueless and don't understand how the Internet works. Apparently, they're too busy boiling their dinner to learn something new.

Does he cook the boxed mashers right in with the crock pot rib soup?

Because even you have a higher rating than the one who complains a lot.

Still showing your jealousy, I see.... You could learn somethings from "idiots", but I doubt it... maybe that's why you're have such personal issues lately... Jus sayen.

So you feel every gun law question here always has 100% correct and legal answers, and no inaccurate info is ever posted?

Along those lines, has anyone heard at the ranges of someone being busted with 10+ mags in the last year since the law took affect? I'm sure some casual shooters, who aren't aware, are still going to the ranges with 10+ mags. Has anyone heard of spot checks of mags anywhere in the state by LEOs? Murphy isn't looking to make an example of anyone, in the name of "protecting the children"?

Why not in NJ, if you glue the baseplate?

Oh boy, part of that I won't even touch.. I understand the part about stupid questions (and I believe the only stupid question is one not asked), but come on, you know better than all of us, for every legit "stupid question" posted here by a newbie, there are TONS of "one hit wonders" that do a single "post and run", never to be heard from again. Like Rosie said above, many of those are "probing" questions by the "enemy". Remember what state most of us live in????? Unless the OP comes back right away with a follow-up question or reply, how do we know if it's a legit "stupid question" or a "prober", where "shooting from the hip with responses" can have the wrong impression, or worse.... The OP finally came back (above), 8 days later, with an additional post, after starting two new threads with the same question a week ago. So, I don't think (either does Rosie) that it's a problem to be "cautious" with replies to newbies until we know more information, specially considering the hostile state we live in.

rarely, very rarely. Case in point, crock pot rib soup.

You have some really serious issues. Should we all chip in and get you professional help?