b47356

In the next crack at court, it will be dismissed because the court will say that Vullo has qualified immunity instead. Just like Jackson told them to in her concurrence

The ever so useful 3rd circuit threw it back to district court in the fallout from Bruen. Happened to just about all 2a cases around the country.

It really isn't.. Or you would have to get arrested to fight any law.

One of the problems in this ruling - besides the total rejection of SCOTUS 2A rulings - is that they said he should of applied for a license - back in 2017, when HI didn't give licenses to civilians (like NJ, CA, etc..)

How can you call it a "private sale" when it has to go through an FFL?

https://www.njoag.gov/attorney-general-platkin-files-civil-complaints-against-pennsylvania-gun-show-company-new-jersey-gun-dealer-under-nj-public-nuisance-law/ Has anyone mentioned to him that PA is not NJ?

Mags: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7147045/association-of-new-jersey-rifle-pistol-clubs-inc-v-grewal/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc AWB: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63567562/ellman-v-platkin/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63562212/cheeseman-v-platkin/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc Or, at the rate the 3rd circuit rules on things - the 6th wednesday of never.

So.. maybe.. years from now an MA state case will make it to SCOTUS. If we are very lucky, it will even occur before the makeup of SCOTUS is changed by a (D) pres. Maybe the 2nd and 9th circuit will rule on some outstanding cases by then..

Why is a SCOTUS regular conference (not emergency docket) suddenly a magical thing? Especially since this "news" .. is a week old. FYI, odds are quite low that the court will take the case at this point.

Don't give them any ideas.

Did I say that? Or did I say that I can't wait to see what the state would come up with in answer to that kind of ruling?

Yeah, I just can't wait to see what "constitutional" things that the state would do in an answer to a ruling that made manufacturing for personal use legal in NJ.

Do we really want to spend another 5+ years in court after NJ does NJ things in the fallout of that kind of ruling?

Will never happen, since most of the plaintiffs argument is that BATFE redefined things contrary to the GCA.

So? Its a ruling on a stay, not the whole case. The sky is falling, the BATFE got a stay on a ruling.