https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/department-of-justice-missouri-gun-law-challenge/2021/08/18/id/1032873/

 

DOJ is claiming that this law violates the supremacy clause of the constitution.    My question is how can they have it both ways.    If the DOJ is correct in their theory than wouldn't NJ's laws also violate it as well using their theory.    NJ is violating the constitution on the 2A so where is the DOJ to our rescue.

1 hour ago, revenger said:

DOJ is claiming that this law violates the supremacy clause of the constitution. 

The DOJ is grasping at straws.  While they are right, that the Supremacy Clause means states cannot nullify federal law, that’s not what Missouri is doing.  They’re just saying that no state or local law enforcement will not enforce federal law nor assist or support federal agents of same.   As far as I know they are not compelled to do so. 

If this suit goes through it could have much bigger ramifications as it could find that local LE is defacto arms of the federal executive.  

2 hours ago, voyager9 said:

If this suit goes through it could have much bigger ramifications as it could find that local LE is defacto arms of the federal executive.  

It should be turned around on them in regards to enforcement of federal immigration laws.  You're right they want it both ways.  The states/localities can refuse to enforce immigration laws and refuse cooperation with ICE, but not as the same applies to the 2A?  Bullshit.

***DELETED***

3 hours ago, samiam said:

I feel a huge sense of gratitude to Mitch McConnell for preventing that festering f***stick Garland from getting Supreme Court confirmation. While Garland can and will manage to screw some things up for gun owners as AG for four years, that is a drop in the bucket compared to the damage he would have inflicted from a lifetime perch on the SCOTUS bench...

Yep, say what you will about Cocaine Mitch, but thank God he was in there to stand against Merrick.

"Justice Department has sought to crack down on illegal firearms, launching a firearms trafficking task force this summer to trace the origins of guns used to commit crimes."

Yeah, maybe  Garland Justice could do a bunch of straw sales at Arizona gun shows, so they can track the movement of the arms across the border. Fast and Furious?

44 minutes ago, leahcim said:

"Justice Department has sought to crack down on illegal firearms, launching a firearms trafficking task force this summer to trace the origins of guns used to commit crimes."

Yeah, maybe  Garland Justice could do a bunch of straw sales at Arizona gun shows, so they can track the movement of the arms across the border. Fast and Furious?

 His administration has some other guns to worry about now. Actually that's assuming they care , so nevermind.

2 hours ago, siderman said:

 His administration has some other guns to worry about now. Actually that's assuming they care , so nevermind.

Sad but true. If we don't see major reversals in the midterm and next presidential election, would be a clear sign that our elections are definitely rigged.

***DELETED***

On 8/18/2021 at 1:10 PM, revenger said:

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/department-of-justice-missouri-gun-law-challenge/2021/08/18/id/1032873/

 

DOJ is claiming that this law violates the supremacy clause of the constitution.    My question is how can they have it both ways.    If the DOJ is correct in their theory than wouldn't NJ's laws also violate it as well using their theory.    NJ is violating the constitution on the 2A so where is the DOJ to our rescue.

That's not how it works...  Laws are only suppose to help the elitist, NWO agenda..  Otherwise you ignore them.  We are still in opposite world where patriots, business owners, and the unmasked are thrown in jail and murderers and rapists let out.  Ask Phil, he can attest to that.