NWS! Too good not to share...

Didn't see it, since I didn't go into it (I was at work). What was it?

When trying to open it I get the error page about not logged in or access rights or some such. It's just a standard post so I don't get it

looks like it's been deleted??

If it's the one I am thinking, it was a nice picture, she was cute sexy and printing and no, not the gun...

It shows on the index, posted at 12:36 today.

 

Not a big deal - I have not seen the symptom before and was just curious

If it's the one I am thinking, it was a nice picture, she was cute sexy and printing and no, not the gun...

 

That would make sense. Now I wish I could delete this entire thread I started. me-a-dummy!

That would make sense. Now I wish I could delete this entire thread I started. me-a-dummy!

 

Don't worry about it, maybe someone will just post the picture here for ya..

censorship is un-american

he should be directed to add it to the chicks with guns thread

Stuff like that that is not safe for work should not be posted here. =) Last thing anyone needs or wants is to have security software and search engines classify the site as "porn/adult content" on top of the "firearms" we are now. =)

No argument here. When I posted I could not, and still can't, see the post. Maybe the post is still listed until the next server refresh cycle. I dunno. As I said earlier - HINT - I wish I could delete this entire thread i started!

What happened was I moved the thread to the lounge section, but then ended up deleting it. Since it is moved to a private section, where search engines cannot go and browse, will make it active. Still don't think it should of been posted.... but whatever.

censorship is un-american

 

What is your boss's email or your daughter's? Let me forward it to them.

[email protected] (self employed) as far as my daughter I will just let that go.

[email protected] (self employed) as far as my daughter I will just let that go.

 

The whole point, there is very very little that is not allowed here, I just ask people to think a little before hitting post.

 

If you call that censorship, sure, lets go with that. This is not central park, but a privately owned forum. It is clearly written that personal attacks and stuff that is not safe for work, should not be posted in the public sections.

 

If anyone doesn't like it, they don't have to post here. =)

 

 

Edit: if anyone recalls, because of some stuff that was posted here a while ago, about a year or two ago, two or three major web filters categorized the site as malware/adult content. As a result, it was auto blocked at most major companies, emails were being blocked. It tooks months to get that cleared up. Our emails are still blocked by hotmail, and yahoo places all of ours in spam. Quite frankly they don't even care.

 

So this little censorship, preventing people from posting borderline porn on a public section, will be removed if you don't mind, in order to keep the site up for thousands of others.

Wow, in agreement with Maks. Gots to keep the "porn" off this site.

it's a gun site.. they let plenty of borderline pictures get through (chicks with guns), but if the picture has actual nudity I fail to see a reason to post it here.. the internet is filled with enough of that as it is?

Stuff like that that is not safe for work should not be posted here. =) Last thing anyone needs or wants is to have security software and search engines classify the site as "porn/adult content" on top of the "firearms" we are now. =)

How about a NWS(adult) section 18yrs+? lol. Nudity is one thing, but she was wearing all her clothing...hehe.

How about a NWS(adult) section 18yrs+?

 

Please no. You can do your porn search, but this is a GUN site.

Please no. You can do your porn search, but this is a GUN site.

Who said ANYTHING about porn..... Besides where is this lounge?

Who said ANYTHING about porn.....

 

Since this thread is about a picture that was banned of an women with a firearm. And since the photo's in the "chicks with guns" and chicks with guns2" are pretty close to porn then I have to believe the photo was over the top. The sight is fine without a 18 and over section.

Since this thread is about a picture that was banned of an women with a firearm. And since the photo's in the "chicks with guns" and chicks with guns2" are pretty close to porn then I have to believe the photo was over the top. The sight is fine without a 18 and over section.

Maybe i should have been abit more clear, possibly a NWS subforum. The chicks with guns could go in there along with anything someone might find offensive.

 

If anyone is bored this thread will keep you busy for weeks... and yes its NWS

http://forum.e46fana...ad.php?t=639688

-If the ads get annoying u can register an account and they disappear.

 

I do agree, nudity does not belong here.

I so regret starting this. Please, no NWS or anything similar. Go elsewhere for that.

 

Maks - since I started this fire, accidently, can I ask to have it shut down?

lol. It is not a problem. =) and was necessary. Just a friendly reminder to the hundreds of new people who don't read the stickies, the rules, and the big thing above the Bucket 3 heading. =)

Gun porn only. I want to see sexy firearms

Edit: Our emails are still blocked by hotmail, and yahoo places all of ours in spam. Quite frankly they don't even care.

 

So this little censorship, preventing people from posting borderline porn on a public section, will be removed if you don't mind, in order to keep the site up for thousands of others.

 

Maksim just a heads, up I recieve all the alerts on my hotmail account no problem in my inbox not the junk folder. I guess everything with them is cleared up

Geeeeze.. It was a female in a wet T shirt, not overly exxageragted in any way and she was drawing a pistol from her holster while partially waist deep in water. Oh the shame, OHH the humanity! Ohh Ray, get a life! You'll find and use ANY Reason to find fault with me and why?? Because I'm a GIANTS Fan and you're not. Very childish...

Since this thread is about a picture that was banned of an women with a firearm. And since the photo's in the "chicks with guns" and chicks with guns2" are pretty close to porn then I have to believe the photo was over the top. The sight is fine without a 18 and over section.

It wasn't "over the top" at all.

 

On a side note, I'm all for a scantily clad subforum. Just like Maks says if ppl don't like whatever they don't have to be here and/or post here...well if ppl don't like or want to see that kind of material, you don't go into that forum. Theres ways of going about it so that the majority could be happy...like going as far as allowing toppless pics with guns BUT don't use the site's uploader(turn it off for that subforum), must be hosted off site. And make it private to primere members(sex sells..always)...If ppl end up looking at it while they're at work and shouldn't be, well its on them...swim at yer own risk.

Since this thread is about a picture that was banned of an women with a firearm. And since the photo's in the "chicks with guns" and chicks with guns2" are pretty close to porn then I have to believe the photo was over the top. The sight is fine without a 18 and over section.

 

All I know is for a guy who hadn't even seen the photo for himself, RayRay is VERY opinionated on the subject of my post and condemning of it. He's also calling for the closing of another thread I started (the one about JoPa having passed on) because HE doesn't like or agree with some of the other posters and their opinions in that one too. Seems like what RayRay doesn't like or agree with he throws a tantrum and demands they be shut down. Is that how life works for you RayRay? Very sad... Very Childish...