Ugh

disliked..

disliked..

 

Same. Part of the reason we have a 2A is so that if our govt got out of hand, the citizenry could revolt. Thats never going to happen with predator drones, tank etc, but the idea was a citizen could carry the same gun as the military.

 

It also burns my ass that people use the phrase semi-auto and make it sound like a machine gun. We should change the terminology like the left does and call them auto-loaders or something.

 

It also burns my ass that people use the phrase semi-auto and make it sound like a machine gun. We should change the terminology like the left does and call them auto-loaders or something.

 

Honestly that can still sound bad. Maybe like "single fire"

3 reasons:

1. I enjoy recreational shooting.

2. I don't have to justify my rights.

3. Black rifles are scary to whimpy Liberal men.

This is just uninformed garbage.

Bookmarked for later

Oh boy, sounds like I'm in for some rage!

I think I detached my f*cking retina from all the eye rolling I did watching that crap.

All the effing liberals always go back to saying " Do you think our founding fathers would have considered a "Assault" rifle part of the second amendment . Im so sick of the term "Assualt Rifle" and how the media is brainwashing people. it makes me sick

That was the stupidest F***ing thing I have ever seen (and as a former NY'er I've seen me some stupid f***ing stuff, lol)

...Do you think our founding fathers would have considered a "Assault" rifle part of the second amendment...

 

Just like they didn't have all these nitwits in mind when they wrote the first amendment

Just like they didn't have all these nitwits in mind when they wrote the first amendment

 

+1 I was thinking the same exact thing! What a bunch of pussies.

Didn't those guys host queer eye?......Not that there's anything wrong with that.

 

But notice it was all prissy preppy guys. Not men

Yeah a bunch of yuppie/preppy/pussy city types.

Reading through the comments under that video is pretty entertaining. A bunch of idiotic liberals acting like know it alls about how all guns should be banned. Another liberal, when asked if he/she would want to have a gun to protect themselves if a criminal invaded his/her home in the middle of the night replied no and that they would just call the authorities and call their insurance to replace damaged or stolen items. After the criminal kills them, I doubt they will be calling anybody!

Aghh... my heart... someone call 911....

 

Seriously, though. If I were older, I might have had a rage-induced heart attack. I cannot deal with people whose views were forged entirely in a kiln of white hot stupidity.

 

I also have a terrible time dealing with people who mistake "semi-auto" for "auto". If I beat someone to death with a dictionary, will they place a page cap at 10 pages per book? I'll leave this to someone better than me.

" Do you think our founding fathers would have considered a "Assault" rifle part of the second amendment . "

 

I'm pretty sure they did.

 

It doesn't say rifles, it doesn't say muskets, it doesn't say pistols,

and it doesn't say axes or swords.

 

They knew that weapons would change over time,

and explicitly wrote "ARMS" to allow for the change in weaponry

 

I personally get fired up when I get "The founding fathers were not picturing our society when they wrote the Second Amendment"

 

My usual retort is yes you are right. How could they have? They were white puritanical men. A partial list of what they also "did not picture" and " would not agree with in modern USA" would include Women's Rights , Gay marriage , abortion , mega extended unemployment benefits , perpetual welfare benefits , and a Black president..to name a few.

 

Has nothing to do with whether I in particular am for or against any of those things I just listed , I just like to point out that the type of men who wrote the Constitution would be considered ultra conservative and misogynistic , they would disagree with almost every liberal stance in modern America , so why do the far left feel comfortable giving any importance or weight to what their theoretical position would be on ANYTHING? It is called regurgitation of something they heard someone else say that they thought sounded witty.

 

I find liberals to be the single most self contradicting group ever. My liberal sister...we have a gun control argument. I support my stance on some stats from various European countries. She says you can't use those countries as a model for anything that would occur in the USA because of population differences , ideals , etc. But then , when you challenge universal healthcare , her immediate go to example is Sweden and Switzerland. Big facepalm.