I have not forgotten the face of my father.

 

 

I just hope most of the LEOs are like you, when everything goes 19. Because we the people are going to need all the help we can get.

What gets lost is that ones personality Has no effect on the merit of their argument or even views. You can be the biggest POS out there and make a good argument just like you can be the most charismatic person and make a crappy argument. Don't forget that.

 

bs...Alex Jones is an idiot...yet his facts and statistics were spot on...however his "New World Order" rant COMPLETELY invalidated everything he said, and hurt the rest of us by providing soundbite fodder for the antis. You can play all the "This is the way it should be" games you want, but the rest of us live in the real world...where appearance, demeanor and actions DO count

 

I do not aim with my eye...

Awesome!

I was wondering who else was gonna pick that up

bs...Alex Jones is an idiot...

 

I agree.

 

yet his facts and statistics were spot on...

 

Yes.

 

however his "New World Order" rant COMPLETELY invalidated everything he said,

 

Incorrect. His ridiculous rant made him look like an idiot, but it does nothing to invalidate any valid point or facts he said, as they have no correlation. To automatically dismiss something based on something else is ignorant, even if the medium you hear it from is a giant dickwad.

 

and hurt the rest of us by providing soundbite fodder for the antis. You can play all the "This is the way it should be" games you want, but the rest of us live in the real world...where appearance, demeanor and actions DO count

 

I agree.

"Incorrect. His ridiculous rant made him look like an idiot, but it does nothing to invalidate any valid point or facts he said, as they have no correlation. To automatically dismiss something based on something else is ignorant, even if the medium you hear it from is a giant dickwad."

 

I disagree with this statement. Ignorant it may be but that is the attention span of the gen public. Diametrically opposed information from both sides mean the gen pub will likely adopt the information form the more cedible seeming scource.

I absolutely agree. I am not saying it won't be dismissed, ignored, or thought less of, because it absolutely will. I am just saying that regardless, a valid point is a valid point (even if not perceived that way, because in this case, it came from a ranting idiot), just like a worthless argument is still worthless even if it comes from a very well spoken and articulate individual. Arguments SHOULD be taken for their merit and merit alone, and not the source at which it comes by.

 

I'm pretty sure we are all actually agreeing with each other.