Magpul will be flooding Colorado with 20 and 30 round mags before the ban and before packing up shop and pulling out of state. They are giving Colorado residents priority over other orders to get mags so the good folks in CO can stock up. 10 mag limit per person and 5 buck flat rate shipping direct from Magpul.

 

It don't get any better then that to set an example!

 

Molon Labe

 

 

Wow...major respect to them. That how you say f u

Even if we got that deal we dont get grandfathering so fu to NJ

Even if we got that deal we dont get grandfathering so fu to NJ

 

a BIG FU to NJ!

Wait, Colorado passed a magazine capacity limit?!?!?!?

Wait, Colorado passed a magazine capacity limit?!?!?!?

 

Not passed yet, but like us they are well on their way.

Hell yeah. Awesome company that deserves our $$$

Wow, that is a stand up company. Will definitely support them in future.

+1000. Wish Glock or S&W had the balls to support us like that.

At least we will have someone to sell our mags to.

Id like to know how COs grandfathering would work.. magpul does not date stamp their mags..how will they tell what has been purchase pre/post ban?

Respect! Glad I bought my 870 with Magpul trim even more (payed ~double the reg 870 price, byt I am very, very pleased with what I got and WHO i got it from).

Great company.

Id like to know how COs grandfathering would work.. magpul does not date stamp their mags..how will they tell what has been purchase pre/post ban?

 

Back during the last federal AWB, didn't post-ban mags above 10 rounds have to be stamped "for law enforcement only" or something?

 

Not sure how that would work if it is not implemented at the national level..individual states can't mandate that manufacturers stamp their mags.. which is probably why most limits at the state-level don't have a grandfather clause.

If you read the CO bill, I believe it stated something to the effect that mags needed to be dated going forward.

This is awesome! I love Magpul.

If you read the CO bill, I believe it stated something to the effect that mags needed to be dated going forward.

 

Yes.. But if magpul leaves CO and does not comply with the dating of mags.. There is no proof of Pre and post ban mag ownership

+1000. Wish Glock or S&W had the balls to support us like that.

 

Major gun companies have another factor to deal with that I didn't think about until this week (c/o Tom Gresham). Publically traded companies (S&W, Roger, etc) have an obligation to their shareholders. If they make a decision to ignore a revenue stream and ultimately cost the company money, they open themselves up to a lawsuit brought by their shareholders.

 

The only way they would be able to join the smaller private companies who are taking a stand against overbearing governments would be if we, the private consumers, would promise to more than make up for the lost revenue from limiting LE sales. Not just, "we won't buy your products if you don't stop selling to X [NYPD, CPD, LAPD, etc)" but rather, "we commit to purchasing 10 magazines each and at least 2 guns each for each year you continue the practice of limiting LE sales to match those of the citizens of said state".

 

It's all about making the decision to support us and our cause be the logical and profitable choice.

I believe magpul does date stamp their mags

So... is Colorado's ban allowing grandfathering?

as written now yes it grandfathers

I believe magpul does date stamp their mags

Well, maybe they should stop.

Colorado

Weed is legal

Mags are not

What a joke

Major gun companies have another factor to deal with that I didn't think about until this week (c/o Tom Gresham). Publically traded companies (S&W, Roger, etc) have an obligation to their shareholders. If they make a decision to ignore a revenue stream and ultimately cost the company money, they open themselves up to a lawsuit brought by their shareholders.

 

The only way they would be able to join the smaller private companies who are taking a stand against overbearing governments would be if we, the private consumers, would promise to more than make up for the lost revenue from limiting LE sales. Not just, "we won't buy your products if you don't stop selling to X [NYPD, CPD, LAPD, etc)" but rather, "we commit to purchasing 10 magazines each and at least 2 guns each for each year you continue the practice of limiting LE sales to match those of the citizens of said state".

 

It's all about making the decision to support us and our cause be the logical and profitable choice.

 

You don't have to put the etc. after S&W and ruger. Unless something changed, they are the only ones that are publicly traded. The answer is simple enough. Don't buy their stuff and their stock will plummet. They'll either go away, or they (or a buyer) will buy back stock and stop being public.

 

The real big problem for them is being charged with conspiring against the government if they go in with other companies.

Well, maybe they should stop.

 

or just date everything 2012

Don't see how it's conspiracy as long as each makes an independent decision.

Glock would be the biggest how many LE use them

Id like to know how COs grandfathering would work.. magpul does not date stamp their mags..how will they tell what has been purchase pre/post ban?

 

You're looking for actual rational logistics of enforcement in a knee-jerk, feel-good-only piece of anti legislation?

Id like to know how COs grandfathering would work.. magpul does not date stamp their mags..how will they tell what has been purchase pre/post ban?

 

The Judge flips a coin for each mag