Been trying to start a poll. I don't think I'm doing it right. but I'm wondering the exact question of the title. 

 

Which 45 acp would you choose? Because I don't know which to get anymore.

 

Sig Sauer 1911 Nitron Rail

 

Springfield Loaded 1911 Parkerized

 

Para USA Expert 14.45

 

FNH FNX 45 +/- tactical

 

Ruger SR1911

 

 

 

And apparently it worked. so yeah, sorry for the double posting the same thing. 

i'dchoose my remington.

Springfield makes a great gun and the customer service is awesome.  Plus, you will have the Custom Shop if you decide to use them.  Good stuff all around.

 

C

From what you posted the loaded..

I would choose the Sig Sauer. I have one and is extremely well built and also Sig has a custom shop service.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Ruger...

Sig all the way. I have to Sig handguns and a Sig ar10. All operate flawlessly and are well made.

I already have a Colt.   Therefore I default next to a FNX

None. You really have not listed any of the top 1911s. I would not consider a 1911 under a $1000 these days.

I'm getting an SR1911... being I don't have one, and not interested in spending over $1,000 on a range gun.

 

However, I picked up a Glock 30S first. I inspected it when it arrived, since I'm waiting on permits, but it is very nice.

I'd get the Ruger.

Out of the guns on that list, definitely the Springfield.

If you want a gun you dont have to worry about nicking up at the range and just want to shoot the living daylights out of.. And have 15 rds of .45, and stay under $700..And have both DA/SA capability in a gun that weights less than a Springer.. Go FNX-45

None of the above. I'll stay with my Kimber

CZ 97B if you can find one.

Think outside the box - S&W 625

 

 

 

 

Well somebody had to do it.

I love my kimber

I pick a Kimber and a S&W Performance Center 1911, why - cause those are the two I have and love.

Wow. No love for the Para. What gives?

I'd get the Ruger.

Scratch that. I didn't see the FNX on there.

CZ 97B if you can find one.

 

+1

Either the Springfield or the para ultra. I liked the para when I last held one

If this is for defensive use, only the FNH out of the choices you listed.

 

If this is for recreational use, I would take the Springfield because it would be the best base gun for a custom build in the future.

 

If this is for digging a hole, propping open a door or hitting someone on the head with a heavy chunk of steel, the Para would work great. 

 

If this is for digging a hole, propping open a door or hitting someone on the head with a heavy chunk of steel, the Para would work great.

 

Wow, this is some Para hate. Are they really of that poor of quality and functionality?

Wow, this is some Para hate. Are they really of that poor of quality and functionality?

 

The early Para's didn't have the best reputation, but since they moved to the US I haven't read much negative about them. I know two people that shoot them competitively - Andy B from the board (you may want to pick his brain via a PM) - I believe his is a single stack. And another fellow I know shoots a double stack Para in IDPA - recently moved up to Sharpshooter with it. I don't recall either of them having any problems with their guns. Everybody has to hate something - I'm guessing it's the Kimber owners hating on the Para's

 

Adios,

 

Pizza Bob

I like the para's. I plan on getting a 14/45 lda in the future

From the choices, I'd go with the Springfield.

 

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

None. You really have not listed any of the top 1911s. I would not consider a 1911 under a $1000 these days.

You saying this from experience or because of the price tag?

None. You really have not listed any of the top 1911s. I would not consider a 1911 under a $1000 these days.

You must not really be aware of whats out there. There are ton of good 1911's for under a grand