real nice price point for the synthetic model at $346 and wood is $ 450.  Wish we could have this...

 

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2013/11/13/citadel-m1-carbine-9mm-additional-information/

is it NJ OK?

I want one...

is it NJ OK?

Banned in NJ

NJ Fail

lol we suck

Banned in NJ

For what reason?  Its a simple rifle with a 10 round mag.   I better not buy any rifles as this looks as legal as one can get outside of going the bolt action single shot type!

NJ FAIL - it's banned by name.

Can someone verify if the receiver says M1 Carbine?

NJ FAIL - it's banned by name.

Thanks....  I would not have known. 

Can someone verify if the receiver says M1 Carbine?

 

Problem is the NJ law says "M1 Carbine Type"

 

http://www.njsp.org/info/pdf/firearms/062408_title13ch54.pdf

 

It's on Page 3 of that document.

Can someone verify if the receiver says M1 Carbine?

 

Buy one

And it takes Berreta 92 mags, too. 

 

Dammit it all to hell!!!

Buy one

 

 

because i need another rifle LOL

 

Paul, If it does not say m1 Carbine on the receiver whats your thoughts?

ar-15 are banned by name and similer but ar's are legal

because i need another rifle LOL

 

Paul, If it does not say m1 Carbine on the receiver whats your thoughts?

ar-15 are banned by name and similer but ar's are legal

 

It would be a nogo for NJ. Were you around for the Kahr situation?  NJSP FIU Lt. Schlueter approved that one for sale in NJ. However, when the skeptics found out that carbines were legal, they called the NJAG to "verify". The AG put a stop to it within one week because of how it was listed in the law as "type".

It's made by Chiappa, no?

Besides the Rhino, I only hear bad things about them, including the .22lr version of this.

It would be a nogo for NJ. Were you around for the Kahr situation?  NJSP FIU Lt. Schlueter approved that one for sale in NJ. However, when the skeptics found out that carbines were legal, they called the NJAG to "verify". The AG put a stop to it within one week because of how it was listed in the law as "type".

 

i was not around during that

It's not illegal, just buy one and enjoy it.  No one is gonna prosecute you over something like this.  Shit, we all own AR-15s, and those are banned by name.  Same with AKs.

I would if they called it a 9mm carbine!

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

 

 

I mean shit there are a tone on NJ ok 9mm carbine rifles on the market that look way more evil then that.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

 

 

Get yourself a used Hi Point Carbine and an ATI stock. 9mm Carbine for 300 all in...

 

 

I did not realize that it was a 9mm. That changes my opinion.

 

Sent from my DROID4 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

It just does not look "right" with the 9mm mag.

It's not illegal, just buy one and enjoy it.  No one is gonna prosecute you over something like this.  Shit, we all own AR-15s, and those are banned by name.  Same with AKs.

How do you figure? Show me a NJ legal AR style rifle that says AR15 on the lower receiver.

Im not saying the FIU is correct  BUT i was told the legacy m1 carbine in 22lr was illegal

 

This was a question i asked them like 9 months ago

 

I would think that as long as it doesn't say M1 carbine on it, it should be good to go.  I'm going to purchase one of those retrofit M1 carbine style stocks for my ruger 10/22.  IMO, there is no way that can be construed as an M1 carbine type.......its a ruger 10/22 that would look similar to an M1 carbine but mechanically completely different.  I would think that in the OP's case it would be the same.  Different manufacturer, no interchangeable parts with a real M1 carbine, not to mention a different caliber too.

I'm torn. It looks really, really nice. But that mag makes it hella gay. I might buy one if there were aftermarket mags.

 

Aint that something? They make it specifically to use an existing mag for convenience and cost savings and I want an aftermarket mag.

 

It just does not look "right" with the 9mm mag.

I would think that as long as it doesn't say M1 carbine on it, it should be good to go. I'm going to purchase one of those retrofit M1 carbine style stocks for my ruger 10/22. IMO, there is no way that can be construed as an M1 carbine type.......its a ruger 10/22 that would look similar to an M1 carbine but mechanically completely different. I would think that in the OP's case it would be the same. Different manufacturer, no interchangeable parts with a real M1 carbine, not to mention a different caliber too.

Original m1 carbines as well as most commercial made versions do not say M1 carbine either. The AO carbine used non interchange internal parts and was not marked M1 carbine and is still not ok forsale.

I am kind of suprised that there has never been any real challange in court of the M1 carbine. I would have figured it would have gotten the colt match target or M1a treatment by now.

I would think that as long as it doesn't say M1 carbine on it, it should be good to go.  I'm going to purchase one of those retrofit M1 carbine style stocks for my ruger 10/22.  IMO, there is no way that can be construed as an M1 carbine type.......its a ruger 10/22 that would look similar to an M1 carbine but mechanically completely different.  I would think that in the OP's case it would be the same.  Different manufacturer, no interchangeable parts with a real M1 carbine, not to mention a different caliber too.

You've answered your own question as to why a Ruger 10/22 in M1 carbine makeup wouldn't be considered a "M1 Carbine type". Mechanically different, no interchangeable parts, etc.