http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/1/gun-reregistration-law-dc-goes-effect-2014/

 

I know this topic probably has been posted before, but this article has a bit more detail.

 

Aside from the cash grab, the requirement to get re-fingerprinted every 3 years is one of the most ridiculous regulations I can think of, aside from a mag limit for legal owners.

 

Makes NJ almost seem sane, doesn't it?

it will be ruled unconstitutional again

Well I mean it's scientifically proven that your finger prints change regularly.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

it will be ruled unconstitutional again

 

Even if it is, unfortunate DC gun owners (are there any?) will have to deal with it until the courts can evaluate it.

Even if it is, unfortunate DC gun owners (are there any?) will have to deal with it until the courts can evaluate it.

 

Agreed. From what I have read, the courts are dragging their feet with Heller II.  One way to accelerate changes to DC's law is if a few gun owners practice civil disobedience and ignore the reregistration requirement.  When there are identifiable individuals whose 2nd, 4th, and 5th amendment rights are trampled, it will garner national attention and make Heller II a priority. FYI according to the article, there are 30,000 registered gun owners. Greater than I thought firsthand. 

 

 

it will be ruled unconstitutional again

 

Puerto Rico has had similar requirements for a while now, and I have never heard of a lawsuit challenging their constitutionality (or lack their of). It just goes to show that legislators will always get their way. Even if it does get struck down, substantial damage will have been done to the People, who have been effectively dissuaded if not disabled from exercising their RKBA. As the number of armed civilians diminishes, the less people there will be to stand up against incremental disarmament measures known as "gun control".