Would you be willing to trade away our already neutered Federal privilege to own Assault Style weapons for National CCW Reciprocity

 

 

You get CCW License good anywhere in the country including NYC, DC, LA, ect. Let's even go as far as to say constitutional carry recognized by the Supreme Court.

 

In exchange All semi auto rifles that accept a detachable magazine are banned .

 

 

If it depends on the details of the Assault weapon Ban to be implemented list the exceptions you can accept in exchange for a national CCW.

 

Exception you would accept...

 

Everything is grandfathered

Only Center fire ammunition rifles are banned

Gov. Compensates us for any rifle/ magazine they confiscate / ban.

Ect,ect, ect

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 This should be good!

NoooooOOOOOOOOooooooooOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooo.

Ummm. Let me think about that for a moment....

 

 

 

 

No!

 

Give them an inch and they'll take a mile.

DITTO

False choice fallacy

This you tool.

NoooooOOOOOOOOooooooooOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooo.

Ummm. Let me think about that for a moment....

 

 

 

 

No!

 

Give them an inch and they'll take a mile.

DITTO

This you tool.

Yeah, what they said.

Here's an attempt at a reasoned answer - please remember this is almost midnight on Superbowl Sunday.

 

In England they wanted to take the semi-auto rifles in 1988. The pistol, shotgun and bolt-action folks said "meh". They took the semi-auto rifles. (The "event" that triggered this was the Hungerford shooting where Michael Ryan killed most of his victims with pistols - go figure)

 

In England they wanted to take the pistols in 1998. The shotgun, bolt-action rifle and muzzle loading folks said "meh". They took the pistols. (The event was Thomas Hamilton killed 15 school children in Dunblane with pistols he had obtained without a valid licence - the people who sold the guns were never prosecuted)

 

In England in 2005 they wanted to stop fox hunting. Deer and vermin hunters said "meh". They banned fox hunting.

 

Please, please, please learn from our mistakes. The anti crowd will use divide and conquer to split us from like minded folks. Don't let them.

 

I don't hunt. I don't shoot skeet. I have no interest at all in muzzle loading. I've done bullseye to death and I want more action in my shooting these days. I will defend all the things I don't want to do personally because I have been burned too many times already by indifference.

 

The anti's attitude is typically "I don't understand why anyone would want to do this awful thing. It should be banned." They need to learn that it is none of their business. If they don't have any interest they should butt out and leave it to those who do.

 

They take their ignorance and turn it into oppression. It is time we all stood together and made it plain that no means no.

Give them them nothing but take from them everything.

 

 

[/thread]

Give an inch they will take a mile and jersey will find a way to make it really hard to get a ccw and won't grandfather anything so I say no

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

 

Those who would give up some liberty for security deserve neither. -Ben Franklin

 

He was 100% correct

Give back nothing. Stand by our Constitution! We have the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, No one can or should take that right from us.

its not a privilege its a right. no compromise.

I will not compomise

I would take the offer, assuming it came with a full ban on Liberals too.  Once implemented we could then change the law to allow the banned guns back.

This is one of the dumbest posts that I have ever seen here.....

This is one of the dumbest posts that I have ever seen here.....

+1 I could not agree more. 

Where do I know that creepy GTFO guy from. Was he in a viral video years ago ?

Worst. Thread. Ever.

Worst. Thread. Ever.

Incorrect

http://njgunforums.com/forum/index.php/topic/39120-winchester-white-box-walmart-easton-pa-purchases-lengthy/

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

One thing we need to realize with liberals is this:

 

Give them an inch, they will take everything.

Based on how libs have gone back on their word before, I would have to say no.

 

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. 

You can not "trade" with people who go back on their word.  Show me one politician who has kept his word.

This is one of the dumbest posts that I have ever seen here.....

  

+1 I could not agree more.

 

+1000

I'd like to point out that no matter how much we would like to not give into anything things are always taken from us without our consent.  For example the mag capacity limits and the evil features of the NJ AWB.  This state is fucked with no chance of coming back, that's why people are leaving.  

 

http://www.nj.com/business/index.ssf/2014/01/moving_vans_taking_people_out_of_state_in_droves_survey_finds.html

Incorrect

http://njgunforums.com/forum/index.php/topic/39120-winchester-white-box-walmart-easton-pa-purchases-lengthy/

No, I was correct. You linked to the best thread ever.